12 Ways to Fix Social Security

They should have just stopped at the point "MODIFY the existing SS tax cap", except change the first word to "ELIMINATE." This is just one more example of the biggest welfare cheat system in this country, the "Welfare for the Wealthy" clause. Many years ago, I "topped out" on the cap when it was around $60,000 with several months left in the year, giving me a 6.2 percent (or whatever the rate was at that time) pay raise on all my income for the rest of the year. Then, like now, congress was always having to come up with funding for Social Security. I thought at the time,"I don't really need this income cap, and felt somewhat guilty because people making almost nothing would pay the same SS contribution rate as I was paying, but had the deduction taken out for the full year. The top 400 individuarl wage earners made an AVERAGE of $273 Million income for the year, and yet paid only $6,622 into Social Security. It wouldn't hurt anyone making above $106,800 per year if they continued to pay into the system. This article states that 95 percent of the deficit could be wiped out by eliminating the cap. This is the ONE FLAT income tax we have in the tax code, and the people who clamor constantly for a FLAT tax should not object to paying the rate that even the poorest American wage earners pay. If they willingly contributed their "fair" FLAT share, I would be more apt to consider their proposal of a flat income tax. But when the top 2 percent are able to contribute unlimited amounts to Super PAC's which send Lobbyists loaded with billions in campaign contributions to wave in a congressman or candidate's face, they can't resist taking the money. If they don't take it, the lobbyists will find another WATER BOY who will work in THEIR BEHALF, which is usually going to be against the interests of 98 percent of Americans. Lobbying needs to be done 100 percent in public view on C Span, with no direct contact with any elected representataives behind closed doors. Equal time needs to be allocated on TV for opposing views. And no congressman should ever be allowed to go to work for a lobbying firm or any company which does business with the government. All Federal elections should be conducted with public campaign financing, over the broadcast airwaves of radio and TV which are by law the property of the people of the United States Of America. The stations are licensed every two years for the sold purpose TO SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST. This has always been true, ahead of the station owners "profit motive." They can profit from selling commercial airtime, but that does not fulfill thier mission. And anyone who says, as Newt Gingrich said about 15 years ago that there "Is not nearly enough money spent on political campaigns" is never going to understand the links between "contributions" and BRIBERY. The biggest problem is that the American people are stuck with the payback costs of these Bribes. $5.00 gasoline is a prime example.

mac gardner of OK 8:57PM May 12, 2012