6 Reasons to Delay Retirement

July 16, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing yesterday to discuss the increasing likelihood that seniors will need and want to delay retirement. Experts testified that Americans working until older ages will have a dramatic impact on the economy, Social Security, and especially their own personal finances. Here’s a look at the reasons the invited witnesses say Americans should choose to work during retirement.

Help Social Security. Seniors continuing to work past age 62 will help sure up the Social Security system. A 10 percent increase in labor force participation among Americans age 62 and older beginning in 2011 would reduce the projected Social Security actuarial deficit and push back the trust fund exhaustion date by an entire year from 2037 to 2038, according to calculations by Stephen Goss, chief actuary of the Social Security Administration.

[See 30 Fast-Growing Careers for Older Workers.]

Companies need you. Some employers are interested in keeping older workers around for their solid work ethic and productivity. The hope is that older workers will pass on some of their knowledge to younger employees. “The country needs them to work to sustain economic productivity and growth and to fill vital roles that demand their skills and experience,” says Marc Freedman, founder and CEO of Civic Ventures and author of Encore: Finding Work That Matters in the Second Half of Life. He says that the health care, education, and green jobs sectors will increasingly have a demand for experienced older workers.

Give back. Delaying retirement also allows seniors to use their energy and talents to give back to the community. Freedman called on congress to fund encore fellowships that would help experienced workers transition into public service, nonprofit, and government jobs.

[See 7 Tips for Working for a Younger Boss.]

Boost the economy. An aging population that continues to work will have more income to stimulate the economy. “An increase in the number of these workers would increase federal and state income tax revenues,” says Senator Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat. States that have enough revenue coming in from existing taxes won’t need to increase taxes.

Flexible scheduling. Working longer doesn’t have to mean slaving away at a job you hate. Many employees are interested in a gradual transition into retirement. “Workers can reduce their hours of work at their principal job or work only seasonally. Their current firm can rehire them after they have retired for a period of time,” says Baucus. “Workers can go to work in another career or occupation or they can do their current kind of work at a different firm.” Bonnie Shelor, senior vice president of Bon Secours Virginia Health System, testified that phased retirement initiatives and flexible work schedules have attracted and retained older workers resulting in 40 percent of Bon Secours employees being age 50 or older.

[See 10 Places to Launch a Second Career in Retirement.]

“The traditional view of retirement as a permanent and complete exit from the labor force and from a full time job held since middle age does not describe most workers today,” says Nicole Maestas, an economist and group manager at RAND Corporation. Instead, many workers downshift into a part time job or even return to the workforce full time after a break. Retirees who re-enter the labor force often change occupations, typically shifting from managerial and professional occupations to jobs with less responsibility and often lower stress, such as sales, administrative support, and service positions. A quarter of 65-year-olds also work for themselves, RAND found.

Financial security. A longer life span means more years workers need to save and plan for. Working longer packs the double punch of giving you more time to save and reducing the number of years that savings must last. Says Freedman: “Financial planners are increasingly advising their clients: The best way to rescue personal finances is to work a few years longer.”

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I totally agree with the six "reasons" made by 'MK Ultra of NE'. I have already delayed my retirement a year because of the 2008 Banking/Wall Street disaster. I have no idea when I might be able, if ever, to retire. My retirement fund, unlike the rich guys, has NOT BOUNCED BACK. I have had two brain surgeries, two knee surgeries, cataract surgery, surgery on both wrists for carpal tunnel and all in the last seven years. I just completed radiation for a tumor. I thank the good Lord I'm still here. But, I'm not in the best shape to keep working and working so our government can throw away my retirement options. It's all well and good to say let them work to 70 to save the Social Security System, but "they" may not be able to work to 70. And you can forget getting "Disability". I've tried, I don't qualify. That's OK, just leave my pension alone and I will make my own way, just like I always have.

But, I do think we need to get rid of EVERY LAST INCUMBENT this fall. Republicans and Democrats. Maybe come up with new parties that can WORK TOGETHER and get something done. I am sick to death of all the fighting and partisanship backstabbing going on in Washington that prevents the REAL WORK that they were sent there to do from being done.

Mostly, I am just sick and tired. Sick and tired of the rich guys and gals in Congress and the White House. Sick of them looking out for themselves with big raises and asking us to cut back and work longer. I'm sick of them forgetting the people that put them there. I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.

Sick and Tired of LA 11:57AM August 13, 2010

First of all it was supposed to be a "Trust Fund". Any public sector such fund, so managed, would have been subject to criminal investigation. Eisenhower started the process of fund pillage by funding the first 5 years of the NSA budget from the Social Security "Trust Fund". Was it ever paid back? A review of just a one year federal budget revealed a 37 Billion surplus for the trust fund. What was done with the proceeds? They bought long term Federal securities, to help balance the Federal Budget. Sounds like the definition of a Ponzi Scheme to me! Their solution: Some Congressional wing-nut has proposed pushing the retirement age from 62 to 70!

J. Smith of PA 8:13AM August 13, 2010

I have a much better idea. How about getting all illegal aliens off of the government dole. This alone should free up billions of$$$$ to pay for U.S. citizens retirement. Folks who have put in their years of work and sacrefice deserve to be able to relax and enjoy life. Again just for starters. Oh and of course kick Obama out of the White House.

Larry of TX 2:53PM August 07, 2010

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement