Social Security Payback Option Eliminated

December 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

Retirees will no longer be able to get an interest-free loan from the Social Security trust fund, the Social Security Administration announced today. Effective on December 8, retirees will not be able to pay back benefits already received in exchange for higher Social Security payments going forward. Here’s a look at how the new Social Security rules could impact your checks.

[See Most Workers Plan to Claim Social Security Early.]

Free loans eliminated. Little-known provisions of Social Security law previously allowed individuals to begin payments at age 62, pay back all the benefits received at age 70 without interest, and then reclaim at a higher rate due to delayed claiming. However, this claiming strategy, which is employed primarily by affluent households, costs the federal government and Social Security trust fund money. “The processing of these withdrawal applications is also a poor use of the agency’s limited administrative resources in a time of fiscal austerity — resources that could be better used to serve the millions of Americans who need Social Security’s services,” says the SSA in a statement. The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College calculated that if all the American workers with enough liquid assets to repay their Social Security benefits utilized this strategy it would cost the system $5.5 billion.

[See 12 Ways to Fix Social Security.]

Under the new rules, Social Security beneficiaries may withdraw an application for retirement benefits only within 12 months of their first Social Security payment and are limited to one withdrawal per lifetime. “There is little to be gained by investing benefits for only 12 months,” notes the SSA in the rule.

Retroactive benefit suspensions discontinued. Another way Social Security beneficiaries were previously allowed to boost their checks was by suspending benefits already received retroactively, repaying the amount received, and then getting higher checks going forward. The new rules allow retirees to voluntarily suspend benefits only for months in which they did not receive payments. Beneficiaries may also suspend future payments beginning the month after the request is made.

[See 10 Things You Didn't Know About Social Security.]

These changes will be applied only to old-age benefit recipients, not survivor and disability beneficiaries. Comments on the new rules will be considered until Feb. 7, 2011. The agency says it will publish a final rule that responds to relevant comments.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I too was caught in this trap. After waiting 9 months my request to pay back & reapply was denied even though I was told this was possible when I started taking SS early. Has anyone appealed this decision successfully?

Janice K of NE 2:14PM June 17, 2013

If I were to suspend ss benefits due to a job hiring, the money I have received would have to be paid back, what is the process on paying back the benefit I have received and is it a lump some or all at once.

Henry Hernandez of CA 4:23PM January 19, 2013

This is grossly unfair to people who applied for early benefits due to the economic collapse, but will be able to recover with a new job.

Any one already receiving benefits should be covered by the rules in effect when they started receiving benefits.

This rule would have made me change my mind and not applied for early retirement.

R. Tabor of HI 8:13PM January 09, 2012

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement