Will You Get Back Your Social Security Taxes in Retirement?

January 6, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (39)

Almost all American workers paid 7.65 percent of their taxable income into the Social Security and Medicare trust funds in 2010, up to $106,800 annually for Social Security. That amount will temporarily drop to 5.65 percent in 2011. Employers pay a matching 7.65 percent for each worker. And self-employed workers must contribute 13.3 percent of their income to the entitlement programs in 2011. Many people wonder if they will get back at least the amount they contributed in retirement.

[See 12 Ways to Fix Social Security.]

The answer largely depends on when you retire and how much you've earned over your lifetime. Consider a single man who earns the average wage throughout his career ($43,100 in 2010 dollars), works every year from age 22 to 64, and then retires at age 65 in 2010. Over his lifetime he has paid $345,000 into the system. But he is likely to get back $72,000 more than that, or $417,000 in Social Security and Medicare payouts, according to recent Urban Institute calculations. A single women with the same work and tax history will come out even further ahead due to her longer life expectancy, likely netting $464,000 in lifetime benefits, which is $192,000 more than she paid into the system. These amounts are in constant 2010 dollars and assume a 2 percent real interest rate.

Medicare benefits are the main reason most workers are coming out ahead. A male earning the average wage throughout his working life who retires in 2010 paid $55,000 into the Medicare trust fund, but is likely to receive $161,000 worth of Medicare benefits, the Urban Institute found. In contrast, he pays $290,000 in Social Security taxes throughout his career and collects $256,000 in retirement payments.

[See 10 Things You Didn't Know About Social Security.]

Married couples generally benefit the most from Social Security and Medicare payments, especially when one spouse earns significantly more than the other. A two-earner couple with one spouse earning the average wage each year ($43,100 in 2010) and the other spouse earning 45 percent of the average wage annually ($19,400 in 2010) who both retire in 2010 will get back $300,000 more in retirement benefits than they paid into the system. A couple with this earnings history would pay $500,000 in taxes over their lifetime, but get back $800,000 in benefits.

When both members of the couple earn the same average wage over their working life, they get back $192,000 more than their tax contributions. In this case the spouses paid $690,000 in Social Security and Medicare taxes and are likely to get $882,000 worth of benefits in retirement.

[See 10 Key Retirement Ages to Plan For.]

The picture is slightly less rosy, but still a good deal, for higher income couples. If one spouse earns 160 percent of the average wage each year ($68,900 in 2010), the other spouse earns the average wage ($43,100 in 2010) annually, and they retire together at age 65 in 2010, they are likely to get back $107,000 more in benefits than they paid in taxes. This couple has paid $882,000 into Social Security and Medicare and can expect to receive $988,000 worth of benefits. This surplus of benefits is again mostly due to Medicare. A couple with this earnings history paid $140,000 in Medicare taxes over their working life, but is likely to collect $343,000 worth of Medicare services.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (39)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You neglected to figure in the interest over those working years!

Therefore, your figures are in correct! Right?

Conrad Clippinger of OH 7:26PM March 19, 2013

When I am done working, the government can give me back all the social security and medicare taxes I paid into the system over my years of working along with all the money my employers paid on my behalf. I won't ask for another penny than that. I'm good at handling money. I would end up with a nice cushion for my kids when I die. Not going to happen? Fine. Then shut up and stop playing games with Social Security and Medicare.

Judy of WI 12:26PM March 09, 2013

There appears to be a lot of faulty figures given here. I worked from 22 to 64 and always made an average salary. The amount taken out for Social Security was capped at a fairly low figure for many of those years. I never cmae close to paying the average amounts suggested in this article. Consequently, I belive the 3 and one half years of receiving benefits is very close to what I paid over my lifetime. I know my employers also contributed on my behalf. One other thing - the rate was not always 7.65%.

My father-in-law recouped all of his contributions in the first six months of receiving benefits at 65. He lived more than twenty years beyond 65. Talk about a good deal.

The problem when Social Security is mentioned, people with their own agendas jump up and ridicule the government. Life expectancy of our population has a more material effect on the solvency of the Fund than any poor management. When this fact is faced up to, we can talk about other improvements.

John of PA 11:36PM January 10, 2013

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement