GAO: 401(k)s Primarily Benefit the Wealthy

May 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

High income employees receive the majority of the tax benefits of 401(k)s, according to a new Government Accountability Office report. The analysis found that 401(k) tax benefits accrue primarily to highly paid employees and do relatively little to help lower income workers save for retirement.

[See How to Get Retiree Health Insurance Before 65.]

Only about half of the private sector workforce has access to any type of retirement benefits at work, with low income workers being the least likely to be offered the opportunity to participate. And even when a plan is available, smaller paychecks limit the ability of low income workers to participate in a 401(k) plan and capture the valuable tax benefits.

Employees can contribute up to $16,500 to a 401(k) in 2011, or $22,000 if they are age 50 or older. But only workers who can afford to contribute that much fully take advantage of the tax break. Only about 5 percent of more than 40 million 401(k) participants contribute at or above these limits for tax deferred contributions. Most of the participants whose contributions are at or above the limits (72 percent) are high earners bringing home $126,000 or more per year. Less than 1 percent of those who earn less than $52,000 annually are able to fully take advantage of the tax deferral, GAO found.

Those who maximize the tax break have a median account balance of $175,000, compared to a median balance of $23,000 for those who contribute below the limit. Households that capture the entire tax break are also much more likely to have plenty of other assets including checking accounts, savings accounts, houses, IRAs, and stocks than retirement savers overall. For example, 65 percent of those contributing at or above the limit also have an IRA, compared to 29 percent of those contributing below the annual maximum.

[See How to Save for Retirement on a Low Income.]

The limit on 401(k) contributions has increased from $10,500 in 2001 to $16,500 in 2011. The option to make catch-up contributions of up to $5,500 in 2011 at age 50 or older was added to 401(k) plans to help older workers, particularly women, catch up in saving for retirement. But whenever the tax deductible limit on 401(k) contributions is increased, it is primarily only high income households that take advantage of it, GAO found.

Most people who make catch-up contributions already have relatively large account balances. The median account balance for those contributing at or above the catch-up contribution limit is $340,000, compared to a median account balance of just $51,000 among all 401(k) participants age 50 and older. “The additional $5,500 contribution permitted to participants 50 and older may not allow moderate income workers to catch up anytime soon,” according to the GAO report. “A disproportionate share of these tax incentives accrues to higher income earners.” And far more older men than women utilize catch-up contributions. Over three quarters of older employees who make catch-up contributions are men.

The American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) disagrees with the GAO report conclusions. “401(k) plans have proven to be incredibly successful at getting moderate income workers to save,” according to ASPPA executive director Brian Graff. “These plans are subject to stringent nondiscrimination rules that are a part of the tax code and were designed by Congress to make sure these plans provide benefits fairly to everyone.”

There are some provisions of 401(k) plans specifically aimed at low income workers. Retirement savers with a modified adjusted gross income of less than $28,250 ($56,500 for couples) in 2011 may be able to claim the saver's credit. This nonrefundable tax credit can be used to reduce the federal income tax you pay by up to $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for couples.

[See What Retirement Savings Tax Breaks Cost Us.]

Retirement tax incentives are the second largest income tax expenditure, according to the Office of Management and Budget. They are expected to cost the federal government approximately $105.1 billion in fiscal year 2011 and a total of $602.2 billion in fiscal years 2012 through 2016. The saver’s credit for low income retirement savers is estimated to account for $1.4 billion of that amount in 2011.

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There are close to 60,000 millionaires getting an extra $2,200 a month in Social Security benefits. They don’t need it but they won’t give it back to the government. So I started “I Don’t Need My Government Money Scholarship Fund” at Frederick Community College. This is where I’m putting my Social Security Money and I’m looking for other Old Farts with benefits they don’t need to join me. For $1,000 a student can pay tuition at community college, and that’s a couple of dinners with friends at a fancy restaurant. Why wait for the government to solve the problem? .... Matthew Lesko, 68 years old

http://leskocollege.blogspot.com/

matthew Lesko of MD 4:22PM May 18, 2011

Saying that employees earning more than $126,000 are more likely to hit the maximum contribution limit of $16,500 than those earning less than $52,000 is about as useful as pointing out the sun is hot!!! Of course high income employees are able to save more, it's called "Disposable Income". They also forgot to mention these same high income employees will likely need more savings in retirement to live at their pre-retirement standard of living.

Grapefire of CT 8:18PM May 10, 2011

I made less than $50,000 for most of my career. But, I started by saving a set percentage, then each year I increased it as I got raises -- until I was saving the max permitted by the 401-k plan (usually 10% of income). I also saved in a Roth IRA (couldn't use a traditional IRA because I already had a retirement plan at work). By the time I retired, I had a little over $250,000.

That's not great, but it was after the 2001 market crash. And, I had "early retirment" as one of those "over 50" that was cut during the upheavals of the last decade (the only severance pay I got was less than $4,000 -- after many years with my last employer). That pretty much stopped my savings program. But at least I HAD the money and I could take it with me because it was MY account. Many of the older folks that were counting on pensions took MAJOR cuts in those pensions when they were forced into "early retirement".

You have to LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS -- when you are working and when you retire. Don't buy the "most house that you can afford". Don't put the new SUV on your home equity line because "you deserve it". And, when you retire -- get your spending and expenses in line with your retirement income as SOON as possible.

Quick of TN 3:42PM May 06, 2011

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement