Automatic Enrollment Hurts Retirement Saving

August 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Automatically enrolling new employees in the 401(k) plan generally gets more people to participate in the retirement plan. But it also leads to low contribution rates because the default saving rate is usually 3 percent or lower, according to several recent studies.

[See 7 Signs of a Good 401(k) Plan.]

Automatically signing up all new employees for the 401(k) plan typically dramatically increases 401(k) participation. Employees in plans with automatic enrollment had a 401(k) participation rate of 82 percent in 2010, compared with a 57 percent participation rate in plans with voluntary enrollment, according to a Vanguard analysis of 2,000 401(k) plans with more than three million participants. Automatic enrollment has been especially effective at getting young and low income workers to join the 401(k) plan. Over three-quarters (76 percent) of employees earning less than $30,000 annually utilize the 401(k) plan when they are automatically enrolled, compared to a quarter (26 percent) of low income employees who voluntarily participate in the plan. And 72 percent of people under age 25 save in 401(k)s when they are automatically enrolled, compared to just 18 percent who take action on their own to sign up for the retirement plan.

However, plans with automatic enrollment have lower average savings rates. Participants in 401(k) plans with automatic enrollment had an average deferral rate of 6.3 percent in 2010, which is 15 percent lower than the 7.4 percent of pay participants in plans with voluntary enrollment saved, Vanguard found. Even young and low income workers saved more in plans with voluntary enrollment. Workers earning less than $30,000 annually saved 6 percent of pay in plans with voluntary enrollment compared to 4.4 percent in 401(k)s with automatic enrollment. And young workers under age 25 voluntarily chose to save 5.2 percent of pay for retirement, but saved just 3.4 percent of pay when they were automatically signed up for the plan.

[See 6 Retirement Benefits in Decline.]

Savings rates are lower when workers are automatically enrolled in the 401(k) plan because most 401(k) plans (73 percent) have a default savings rate of 3 percent or less. The most common default savings rate, used by 58 percent of 401(k) plans, is 3 percent of pay, Vanguard found. Companies that provide a 401(k) match may have an incentive to keep the default savings rate low. An Aon Hewitt survey of 210 mid-size and large U.S. companies with 6.2 million workers found that 73 percent of employers without automatic enrollment cite the increased cost of the employer match for all the new 401(k) participants as the primary reason for not changing their 401(k) plan.

Other studies have also found dramatically lower savings rates in 401(k) plans with automatic enrollment. A recent Mercer analysis of 1.2 million 401(k) participants found that those automatically enrolled in 401(k) plans (without an automatic savings increase) had an average savings rate of 3.5 percent of pay in 2010, compared to 8.5 percent among self-enrolled participants. “Those who self-enroll and set their own contribution rate are contributing nearly two and half times those who are automatically enrolled,” says Dave Tolve, U.S. retirement business leader for Mercer’s outsourcing business. “While automatic enrollment obviously increases overall plan participation, it does little to overcome the inertia of unengaged employees.” Workers who were automatically enrolled and also had their contribution rate automatically increased saved slightly more, an average of 4.4 percent of pay, but still much less than individuals who voluntarily enrolled in these types of plans (7.4 percent of pay). “While further enhancing defined contribution plans with automatic increase features does drive increased savings, there is no comparison to the contribution and account values of actively engaged participants who consciously make retirement savings decisions,” says Tolve. The most common default contribution rate for Mercer-administered 401(k) plans is 3 percent.

Automatic enrollment is also changing how people invest for retirement. Many workers are invested in target-date funds by default, unless they choose a different investment. Target-date funds tend to have high concentrations of equities for young individuals and gradually become more conservative over time. The growing use of target-date funds has caused young investors to take on more risk in their 401(k)s. 401(k) participants age 35 and under who own target-date funds had an average of 8.5 percentage points more in equities than employees without a target-date fund, Vanguard found. And target-date fund owners ages 36 to 54 held 7.9 percentage points more in equities. However, investors over age 54 who own target-date funds have only 1.6 percentage points less allocated to equities than older investors without them.

[See How to Strengthen Your Retirement End Game.]

Nearly a quarter (24 percent) of Vanguard 401(k) plans had automatic enrollment in 2010, up from just 5 percent in 2005. And almost half (45 percent) of large 401(k) plans with 5,000 or more participants automatically enroll employees in the 401(k) plan unless they opt out. Aon Hewitt found that over a third (36 percent) of mid-size and large U.S. companies without automatic enrollment say they are likely to begin automatically enrolling new employees this year.

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This title of this article certainly is sensational, but it’s not supported by the article.

Let’s assume that a) automatic enrollment increases participation and b) the average deferral is lower with automatic enrollment. This does not necessarily mean that automatic enrollment reduces savings rates. The lower average deferral may be statistically true, but it may come about because automatic enrollment skews the final result by adding in new people at a low rate.

For example:

A company has 4 employees and 2 of them participate in the 401k plan (a 50% enrollment rate).

One employee contributes 8% of salary and one contributes 10% of salary.

The average deferral is 9% (8% + 10% = 18%. Divide by 2 to get 9%) .

The company institutes automatic enrollment at 3%. One of the remaining two employees opts out altogether, but the other does not. Now the company has a 75% participation rate, but, since the new participant is contributing at 3%, the average deferral rate falls to 7% (8% + 10% + 3% = 21%. Divide by 3 to get an average of 7%).

Thomas Finch of CA 5:49PM August 10, 2011

Your headline is misleading.

The top 3 retirement preparation issues Americans face are:

o Most companies firms do not offer a retirement savings plan,

o Too many who are eligible fail to save, and

o Those who do save, often do not save enough.

Most 401k plans don't have automatic enrollment. Most plans that do often limit automatic features to new hires, and only a subset of those plans use automatic escalation. However, the data you cited only tell part of the story about automatic features.

Consider a recent Vanguard study, "How America Saves, 2011," Figure 23, page 25 — of those with < 1 year service, only 29% voluntarily enroll vs 75% with automatic enrollment. Recent EBRI analysis, in one scenario, suggest perhaps as many as 40% would contribute more using voluntary enrollment. So, a year’s tradeoff might be estimated as:

o 12% (40% of 29%) say they would have contributed more,

o 17% (rest of 29%) would have contributed 3% or less anyway,

o 46% more (for a total of 75%) are automatically enrolled, and

o All 75% are “teed up” for automatic escalation.

Remember, EACH and EVERY worker who allowed a 3% default to take effect was specifically notified of their opportunity to enroll - and select a different contribution rate. Fact is, many, if not most, would not be contributing except for automatic enrollment.

Your average contribution rate comparison of participants may be misleading since most companies still limit automatic enrollment to new hires - in a voluntary enrollment plans, fewer participate, and those that do tend to be higher paid, older and with longer service. For example, one AonHewitt study showed an average contribution rate decline from 7.9% (2006) to 7.3% (2009). However, the 2006 & 2009 populations were very different — by 2009, many were contributing 3% specifically because of the increased prevalence of automatic enrollment. AonHewitt published a study of 120 large employers in May 2011, showing:

o 2010 participation of 75.8% vs 73.7% in 2009,

o ~60% of 2010 plans had auto features vs 24% in 2006.

So, a better contribution rate comparison uses the average deferral percentage (ADP) — when non-participant zeros are included in your averages, it offers a much more accurate measure of how automatic features change savings behavior.

To conclude, yes, automatic features/designs do make a big, big difference. But, automatic features, done right, ensure higher levels of participation, higher contributions and over time, higher average contributions. Automatic best practices include PERENIALLY:

o Enrolling all eligibles, and

o Increasing contributions for all who are saving less than a target level (12%, 15%, etc.)

Change your headline. Automatic enrollment increases participation, it increases the total amount saved by all eligibles, and over time, done right, it will also increase the average contribution rate.

BenefitJack of OH 4:16PM August 10, 2011

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement