A Bailout for Small Business?

October 15, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (20)

Yesterday the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. announced that it will take the biggest step any part of the federal government has taken to "bail out" small businesses in the wake of the financial crisis. Forbes reports:

The FDIC will also expand deposit insurance for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts used by many small businesses. Many businesses that had accounts larger than the Federal Deposit Insurance limit, currently $250,000, were pulling accounts from smaller banks and moving them to larger, safer banks. Under the new program, the FDIC will provide full insurance coverage for non-interest-bearing accounts until the end of next year. Banks will pay a new premium to cover the expense of the program.

What are these "non-interest-bearing accounts," and why do they matter so much for small businesses? The Jacksonville Business Journal explains:

These are mainly payment-processing accounts, such as payroll accounts used by businesses that often exceed the current maximum limit of $250,000. This new, temporary guarantee, which expires at the end of 2009, will help stabilize these accounts, FDIC said.

The move will be funded by fees on banks, not taxpayers. So is there any catch? The FDIC is not a magic wand that can make all problems go away. John Berlau of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has argued that increasing FDIC guarantees can have some bad consequences down the road:

But wasn't too much confidence in the banking system in large part what got us into this mess? Deposit insurance, even at current levels, encourages "moral hazard" as consumers assume their banks are totally safe and don't look for quality as they do with investments and so many other products.

Here Berlau is talking about raising the FDIC's cap on deposit insurance, but the same problem could apply to these new guarantees for non-interest-bearing accounts. On the other hand, the fact that this FDIC move is temporary and will expire at the end of 2009 should partially address that moral hazard concern.

Tags:
FDIC,
small business,
banking

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Center for Media Research has released a study by Vertical Response that shows just where many of these ‘Main Street’ players are going with their online dollars. The big winners: e-mail and social media. With only 3.8% of small business folks NOT planning on using e-mail marketing and with social media carrying the perception of being free (which they so rudely discover it is far from free) this should make some in the banner and search crowd a little wary.

joneey 7:08AM January 07, 2010

first i am a small business owner in constructio second every small business owner and american needs to unite and yell at our so called government its more like the rich boys club and we are not members of that club. they dont care about 1000.000 and more small business owners going under as long as they can cover there big business or the banks. until we speak up and tell them hey this is our land and our home too. and its our money that your giving away and every american should look at what we buy and if it dont say made in the USA leave it on the shelf let wal-mart fall too they say low prices ya i say all they do is buy over seas. look at just what is made in the USA sold at wal- mart and all these other stores too. keep american jobs in america and keep american money in america if the bank or a car company falls and goes under well im sure a smart bank can buy them up at a steal and re work it so they wont get there big checks any more oh well welcome to the real world

ronald a moreira north carolina of NC 11:08AM May 19, 2009

It's the large businesses that have fulfilled Congress' dreams for the last four decades- the non-polluting, safer workplaces, the affirmative action programs, safer products, .

Small business? What is small businss, if not a bunch of corner-cutting, tax-cheating, under-capitalized, scheming, unemployable, immigrant-exploiting. Republican-voting misfits championed by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and John McCain? I've worked for small businesses and family farmers most of my life: no benefits, low wages, glass ceilings (the good jobs go to their relatives), unsafe workplaces, no paid holidays or vacations or health care benefits. For themselves, it's nice cars, nice houses, nice toys, and for the workers it's 'my way or the highway' and a notion that they're doing God's work by employing the less-fortunate. It's easy to idolize the small business owner when you're a politician or government employee or large-company worker, but impossible when you actually are an employee of a small business. Enough, already!

Late in life, I became a Union man and started earning a living wage. I'm now quite irritated that the Democrat party that my union supported has turned out to be just as good for the aristocracy as the Republican party of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Dumya Bush!

PWT of WA 1:19AM March 18, 2009

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement