No First Amendment Rights For Fortune Teller

December 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Another entry into the case file of frivolous local regulations on entrepreneurs:

Nick Nefedro, previously of Key West, Fla., said county officials violated his First Amendment rights to free speech and discriminated against his Roma, or Gypsy, culture when they refused to give him a business license to open a foretune-telling shop in Bethesda. Montgomery code dating back to the early 1950s prohibits collecting cash for predicting the future....

...Clifford Royalty, an attorney for Montgomery County, told The Examiner the court upheld the law and he expected a judge to return a signed copy of his written order this week.

“Insofar as the county law does regulate speech, it is narrowly drawn to serve the county’s compelling government interest in protecting its citizenry from fraud,” Royalty’s order said.

I realize that this is a slightly harder case than some other examples because almost no one likes bogus psychics and soothsayers. I certainly would never spend money on them. At the same time, I am not willing to say that these businesses do not have a right to exist if some people do want to spend their money on them. To say that the local government needs to "protect" its citizens from the "fraud" perpetrated by these businesses is giving the fortune tellers too much credit, and its customers too little credit. These customers know what they are getting into when they sit in front of the tarot cards or a crystal ball--if it makes them feel a little bit better, and a local business benefits, who is really being hurt in that exchange?

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue. ~~ Francois de La Rochefoucauld

This is a topic in which Libertarians exercise their own brand of hypocrisy. (Do you get it? "Free Speech" includes FALSE speech, but try to get a dizzy Libertarian to admit that (since "false speech" includes "fraud") and let me know how that comes out!)

I guess that's what makes the Libbies a "legitimate" political party, eh?

As to the entrenched usurpers of the united States' Constitution, the hypocrisy is blatantly presented in their own statement:

"the county law does regulate speech"

The "supreme law of the land" says quite plainly: "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech"

The only problem here is, the American people are TOO STUPID to do anything about it, so the ruling class can admit their crimes (against the First Amendment in this case) with complete impunity.

Oh, you're mad because I pointed out how STUPID you are?

When was the last time YOU voted AGAINST your own politician? Hmmmmm??

If you want mine voted out, show us by voting yours out. It's your duty as a Citizen, your responsibility to your fellow Americans, and just a darned Good Idea.

If you vote to retain your politician, how do you think the problems your guy and my guy conspire to create will ever get fixed??? Hmmmmm???

Me? I'm going through the process of making my politician's "constituent Services" people explain to me how to file a Recall Petition ON HIM. I have written, published evidence that he (Joe Wilson) lied about voting for the first bailout, but telling us peons he "did not support that measure". I think it's only fitting that his own people lead me through the process of kicking his lying backside to the curb.

Now...

What are YOU doing to help?

Jim of SC 7:34PM February 14, 2009

We have yet to hear from any of the countless Gypsy fortunetelling victims here. When and if they respond, I can assure you that they will be able to document just how wrong many of the respondents on this topic are, and of the horrors that these thieves have caused others to suffer. Before casting your opinion on this topic in stone, why not visit fraudtech.org and read what is offered there on the topic of fortunetellers and psychics.

FraudTech of WI 3:30PM December 20, 2008

There is a huge movement among many tarot readers to show tarot as a developmental tool, without fortune-telling necessarily being involved.

The reader helps the client to look at possibilities in his/her life, exploring different perspectives and helping lateral thinking.

Even with fortune-telling, fraud surely needs to be proven rather than assumed. With this, very different, type of tarot reading, often prefaced by the reader saying "I don't tell the future", where's the fraud?

Even with fortune-telling - agree with comments made so far. If a reader can be proven to con and harm clients, then legal action can ensue. You don't legislate against all lawyers or doctors because some may become guilty of malpractice!

Usual fraud regulations should cover tarot readers as others, but not an assumption of guilt from the outset.

Lu of 10:29AM December 19, 2008

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement