A Stimulus For The Drug War

Reader Comments

Back to blog

You are 100% correct in your article about the US War on Drugs being as slush fund / employment program...

Gene of TX 9:02PM June 14, 2011

Your assessment could not be more wrong. Drugs are ruining rural communities, who have little funds to fight this war. People in urban area don't have a clue about this, they live over in their suburbs and gated communities and don't have a clue. This is a war in rural Texas that we are fighting. You people need to wake up.

M. Hardin of TX 5:50PM April 07, 2009

Brilliant article and observation.Brilliant.

truthseeker of IL 5:25PM February 22, 2009

The Interim Report (pdf, see pp 39-43) of the Texas House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee, quoted below, demands an end to Texas' regional narcotics task force system as we know it:

http://www.house.state.tx.us/committees/reports/78interim/welcome.htm

"Continuing to sanction task force operations as stand-alone law enforcement entities - with widespread authority to operate at will across multiple jurisdictional lines - should not continue. The current approach violates practically every sound principle of police oversight and accountability applicable to narcotics interdiction."

CJC plainly condemns Texas' network of drug task forces financed by the federal Byrne grant program. The committee , led by Republican former Travis County Sheriff Chairman Terry Keel, R-Austin, unanimously agreed and did not minced words in its rebuke of the task force system.

Regulation, science based education and treating abuse as a medical problem is a better drug policy that increases public safety and harm reduction. Law Enforcement Against Prohibition has kicked off the 'We Can Do It Again' project, calling for an end to drug prohibition.

Considering the oppression, the outrageous violence and official lawlessness triggered by the drug war will end with repeal just as these policy created problems vanished with the repeal of alcohol prohibition, what are we waiting for? Warriors can get their adenaline rush chasing murderers and other violent predators.

Colleen McCool of TX 6:53PM February 20, 2009

for reducing the drug supply. There is a lot to be said for reducing the influence of drug gangs. Pound the suppliers.

There is nothing good to be said for trying to incarcerate more of the mere users.

Law enforcement often slips on the former and capitalizes on the latter. Chalk this backwards approach up to inside bribery, most likely.

Muser of NM 5:25PM February 20, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement