Is Internet Porn Destroying America?

February 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print

The Washington Times editorializes about the "virulent cancer" that is destroying our economy. Toxic bank assets? Nope--Internet porn. (HT: The Agitator)

The Times supports Senator Chuck Grassley in calling for a "national conversation" about employees watching porn on their computers at work. Of course, we know what these "conversations" turn into when kicked off by politicians--witness the circus of Congressional hearings around the issue of Major League Baseball and steroids.

I've blogged about attempts to regulate the Internet before, because I think that keeping this "last frontier" safe from regulation is very importnat for the interests of the entrepreneurial community. So what about this claim that workplace internet porn is draining productivity and wasting wages?

Let's look at the only evidence the Times uses to back up this claim:

As ranking member of the Committee on Finance, Sen. Grassley has sent a letter to the National Science Foundation asking for more information on employees viewing pornography on company time. He cited the most recent NSF Semiannual Report that referred to a systemic problem in which government computers were being used to view sexually explicit material.

One employee spent 20 percent of his work time viewing pornography - a cost of $58,000 in compensation he received for work he was not doing. Sen. Grassley is calling for a complete account of the use of the NSF drive by its employees. This, he rightly says, is an essential component of his oversight responsibilities - especially since the NSF relies on public funds for scientific and engineering research. Certainly Americans do not want their tax dollars being used to pay employees for indulging their sexual fantasies.

That last sentence is certainly correct. But a problem with Internet porn in the government bureaucracy hardly means there is a national crisis at work. Wasting money happens in bureaucracies with or without Internet porn. For just one recent example, recall the story about the New York State Insurance Fund employee who has been paid as much as $93,803 to do literally nothing.

Are there any actual empirical studies out there about how much internet porn costs the private sector in productivity?

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (31)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

First, the employee loss of 20% at $58,000 means 100% is $290,000. Really?

2nd... anyone worth their salt can easily spend 20% of their time looking at porn and still get tons of work done. Perhaps they are less likely to sue over a slip and fall or discrimination?

Solution: "Sunset" Congress... disband most of the government and viola! It's much cheaper to pay someone to watch porn and give them unemployment and subsidies. Let's hire porn stars to do essential government positions as they are VERY hard working. ;-)

Heartslortd of NY 12:14AM April 08, 2012

What is this with Porn and Freedom of Speech? I have not once heard a Vagina utter anything worth repeating.

BlownfuelCoupe of NV 10:54AM March 20, 2012

$58,000 for the work he was not doing? If he wasn't doing 20% of his work, then he's paid a salary of $290,000. That more shocking than the porn!

Culture_Skeptic of NC 10:03AM March 20, 2012

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement