Obama's State Of The Union Vs. Bobby Jindal's Response: Two Views On The Role Of Government For The Entrepreneur

February 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Let's compare the ideas expressed by President Obama and Governor Jindal in their respective speeches last night. Specifically, I'm going to look at what they think are the proper duties of government toward the entrepreneurial sector of the economy.

Obama (emphasis mine):

I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.

For history tells a different story. History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college and created the largest middle-class in history. And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.

In each case, government didn’t supplant private enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and to thrive.

Jindal:

During Katrina, I visited Sheriff Harry Lee, a Democrat and a good friend of mine. When I walked into his makeshift office I’d never seen him so angry. He was yelling into the phone: ‘Well, I’m the Sheriff and if you don’t like it you can come and arrest me!’ I asked him: ‘Sheriff, what’s got you so mad?’ He told me that he had put out a call for volunteers to come with their boats to rescue people who were trapped on their rooftops by the floodwaters. The boats were all lined up ready to go - when some bureaucrat showed up and told them they couldn’t go out on the water unless they had proof of insurance and registration. I told him, ‘Sheriff, that’s ridiculous.’ And before I knew it, he was yelling into the phone: ‘Congressman Jindal is here, and he says you can come and arrest him too!’ Harry just told the boaters to ignore the bureaucrats and start rescuing people.

There is a lesson in this experience: The strength of America is not found in our government. It is found in the compassionate hearts and enterprising spirit of our citizens. We are grateful for the support we have received from across the nation for the ongoing recovery efforts. This spirit got Louisiana through the hurricanes - and this spirit will get our nation through the storms we face today.

To solve our current problems, Washington must lead. But the way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians. The way to lead is by empowering you - the American people.

My thoughts:

 As a response to Obama, Jindal's speech fails. Both agree that the government should empower American enterprise. But Jindal never answers head-on why government investment can't also empower enterprise--which is Obama's point I emphasized. Jindal's argument that Obama's policies will just "saddle" us with more debt does not work for this purpose because Jindal's policy alternatives would also increase the debt.

I'm not saying that there is no good response out there to Obama's vision of government and the entrepreneur. I'm just saying that the Republicans are not making that response.

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"THERE IS NO CASE" if you can't get past bashing trickle down.

Who in their right mind would think the Federal Government has the individual’s best interest at heart? The Bush administration had it wrong. Obama has it wrong.

The bowling ally analogy says it all. Gutter on the right, gutter on the left. Get it down the middle and we all win!

Mohammad of GA 9:46PM February 25, 2009

When I listen, I hear a President that believes that government and its glorious bureaucracy knows best. Collecting taxes and redistribution based on the Federal Governments whims. (A monorail from Las Vegas to Disney Land?)

Consider the cost of collecting taxes, managing the programs oversight, and the distribution logistics of the stimulus package.

Hello... why not use a portion of the stimulus package to take care of the deserving needy and the education of our children. Then, give a 6-month sabbatical on collecting Federal Income Tax. A Tax sabbatical would certainly help the typical consumer’s cash flow problems. And do it all while not growing the Federal Governments payroll.

Call it what you want...Liberal...Conservative...what about logical.

Lisa of FL 8:14PM February 25, 2009

I was really looking for something new that the Republicans would have to offer in their response. I am a Democrat but I welcome spirited debate and intellectual honesty. I got none of that, just the same old flat rhetoric. Please run Jindal in 2012. Do the country a favor.

Keith of NY 1:58PM February 25, 2009

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement