Why We Should Let Newspapers Die

April 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Michael Kinsley in the Washington Post today opposes the idea of a newspaper bailout, as advocated by Senator Ben Cardin, as well as several journalists in The Nation:

You may love the morning ritual of the paper and coffee, as I do, but do you seriously think that this deserves a subsidy? Sorry, but people who have grown up around computers find reading the news on paper just as annoying as you find reading it on a screen. (All that ink on your hands and clothes.) If your concern is grander -- that if we don't save traditional newspapers we will lose information vital to democracy -- you are saying that people should get this information whether or not they want it. That's an unattractive argument: shoving information down people's throats in the name of democracy.

Also, see my previous post on this subject.

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

When cars started to appear most people went crazy against this new way of transportation, passing ridiculous laws to stop the spread of this menacing new technology. The new generation came and never went back to ride a horse to work. To pass laws to try to save the Newspapers wold have been the same as trying to stop cars from takings over carriages. Union members from newspapers won't agree with this of course.

Rod Torres of WI 6:14PM April 29, 2009

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement