'Sweet Home Chicago' Not So Sweet For Entrepreneurs

May 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

We have some data on the best and worst states to start a business. But local and municipal laws are often more important than state laws. So what about the best and worst cities in which to start a business? I'm not aware of any studies that compare the various business regulations of cities across the board. But a recently released study from the Institute for Justice makes an interesting case that if there were such ranking, the city of Chicago would be at or near the bottom.

According to the study, "the overlapping rules of the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois create a matrix that is so confusing and nonsensical that it often seems designed to stop entrepreneurs in their tracks."  What are some examples of these byzantine regulations?

-Many certain types of businesses, like child play centers or barbershops, have special rules that apply to them that make it more expensive and time-consuming to get off the ground.  But businesses without special rules still must pay a $250 business license fee every two years, or suffer penalties from $200 to $500 a day if they operate without licenses.

-Businesses can be fined for not providing off-street parking in a lot.  That would seem to against the honor the city of Chicago recently won from the National Building Museum for "going green."

-Home-based businesse are particularly difficult to start in Chicago: only one person in a home can be working on the business.  If customers are coming to the home to purchase goods, only two customers can be served at a time and only ten can be served a day.

-Street vendors are not allowed to run their businesses outside major, tourist-filled landmarks such as the Art Institute, and are arbitrarily prohibited from selling some goods such as flowers.

The full report has much, much more, as well as examples of specific Chicagoan small-business people hindered by the laws.

Is Chicago the worst city in America to start a business? My hunch is that it is not, and if one investigated other cities with as much detail as IJ has investigated Chicago, one would find similar burdens on entrepreneurs.

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Somebody has to pay for our corrupt politicians.

It is hard enough to try to get clients and make payroll.

What this article doesn't get at is the shakedowns from the city inspectors.

http://www.bradmillerdesign.com

Brad Miller of IL 11:12PM July 07, 2009

Matt,

You are absolutely correct with your thoughts in your final paragraph.

Regards,

Laurel

Chicago

http://borderbuster.blogspot.com

Laurel Delaney of IL 10:10PM May 26, 2009

It may be difficult to have a business at home for the reason mentioned in the article but if it is an online business we won't have the problem of having just one person to service the customers. I mean there may still be one to do the work, but at least customers are not going to wait twiddling their thumbs waiting because they can do something else in their own home while the other customers are being served.

Evelyn Guzman

http://www.homebusinesssteps.com (If you want to visit, just click but if it doesn’t work, copy and paste it onto your browser.)

Evelyn Guzman of FL 9:14AM May 23, 2009

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement