Sonia Sotomayor: Where She Stands On Business

May 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Here's what seems to be the consensus opinion about whether or not Sonia Sotomayor will be good for business: Um, maybe?

When it comes to small businesses, law prof Richard Epstein points to one case that he says should have business owners shaking in their boots. It has to do with an entrepreneur who had bought land to build a CVS franchise, and then ran into trouble:

The case involved about as naked an abuse of government power as could be imagined. Bart Didden came up with an idea to build a pharmacy on land he owned in a redevelopment district in Port Chester over which the town of Port Chester had given Greg Wasser control. Wasser told Didden that he would approve the project only if Didden paid him $800,000 or gave him a partnership interest. The "or else" was that the land would be promptly condemned by the village, and Wasser would put up a pharmacy himself. Just that came to pass. But the Second Circuit panel on which Sotomayor sat did not raise an eyebrow. Its entire analysis reads as follows: "We agree with the district court that [Wasser's] voluntary attempt to resolve appellants' demands was neither an unconstitutional exaction in the form of extortion nor an equal protection violation."

Whether or not one agrees with Epstein that this decision means that Sotomayor is "bad for business" depends on one's view of the Supreme Court to which she was deferring--Kelo v. City of New London. One could argue that by expanding local governments' use of eminent domain for redevelopment, Kelo might help small businesses by creating new commercial developments that otherwise wouldn't exist. On the other hand, it seems that eminent domain will more often be used to benefit large, wealthier more connected firms--for example, the proposed development in the actual Kelo case was favored by pharma giant Pfizer.

At the Atlantic, David Indiviglio points to some cases where Sotomayer, he says, was "not pro-business, but not anti-business either."

Tags:
small business

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

in federal court with Houston-based Spectra Energy, I can confirm that the power of eminent domain in the hands of government — which is transferred to a business — creates a sense of entitlement; and it creates an atmosphere ripe for abuse.

To suggest that big government is the solution to citizens' challenges is naive. An informed and engaged citizenry is necessary to put pressure on government and business.

We are a group of property owners who are doing just that. One of our goals is to share information with fellow property owners who are involved in property rights issue. Our website has begun to draw inquiries from Massachusetts to Oklahoma from folks facing similar challenges.

For info, our site includes a landowner video to put a face on the property rights movement and blog postings:

http://www.spectraenergywatch.com/blog/

MikeB of NY 8:40AM May 29, 2009

None of the stories I read indicated Ms. Sotomayor's record as far as being overturned on appeal. I have heard--rumor only--that she's very vulnerable on this front...

Jill of CA 6:58PM May 28, 2009

OK--Bork was one. Wow.

Now let's harp on another nominee for two months.

ars of IN 8:23AM May 28, 2009

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement