Will More Reverse Mortgages Mean More Fraud?

July 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

The rising popularity of federally insured reverse mortgages attracted 1,500 new lenders into the program last year, more than doubling the total of participating lenders. And while reports of consumer abuse and fraud are infrequent, legislators and regulators are calling for strengthened oversight to protect seniors from aggressive or outright unscrupulous lenders.

The federal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program allows homeowners aged 62 and up to borrow money against the equity in their homes. The funds are available as lump sums, regular payments or lines of credit. Borrowers can remain in their homes as long as they're able without making further mortgage payments. They do, however, need to pay property taxes and insurance and keep up the home. The interest payments on the money they borrow are paid to lenders out of the remaining equity in the home. If borrowers stay in the home long enough to use up all their equity, they generally face no further financial obligation to the lender.

[See The New Rules of Reverse Mortgages.]

At field hearings this week in St. Louis, convened by Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, attention was focused on beefing up the legally required consumer consulting sessions that are supposed to help potential borrowers understand the complicated HECM program and make sound decisions. As it turns out, according to a report by the General Accountability Office (GAO), the sessions often exclude key information that consumers should know. Under current rules, counseling sessions also can be done on the telephone, and some regulators feel face-to-face meetings should be required.

The GAO also reviewed HECM lender marketing materials and highlighted six promotional claims and reasons they might mislead consumers:

1) Never owe more than the value of your home.
Borrowers or their heirs could have a loan balance greater than the value of the home. While they could walk away from the property and not owe the money, they would need to pay it if for any reason they wanted to keep the home. The GAO said this was the most common misleading statement it encountered and was even made in government materials that were later changed.

2) Implications that the reverse mortgage is a “government benefit” or otherwise, not a loan. HECMs are federally insured but they are a loan, not a benefit.

3) "Lifetime income" or “Can’t outlive loan”.
Borrowers can arrange to receive monthly payments so long as they stay in the home. But the payments cease when they leave or if they violate other conditions of the mortgage.

4) Never lose your home.
Lenders can foreclose on a HECM borrower’s home if the borrower did not pay property taxes and hazard insurance or did not maintain the house.

5) Misrepresenting government affiliation. Some materials include government symbols and logos, and imply the lender is a government agency.

6) Claims of time and geographic limits. Some lender claims falsely imply that HECM loans are limited to a certain geographic area, or that the consumer must respond within a certain time to qualify for the loan.

Additional concerns were raised by Anthony G. Medici, a Housing and Urban Development criminal investigator. Again, while actual abuses are not large in number, he testified that the rising attractiveness of HECM loans, coupled with growing financial needs among seniors, makes the program more susceptible to fraud. A specific fraud involving "hundreds" of current cases, he said, recruits phony home buyers who move into abandoned or foreclosed properties that have been purchased for little money. Using fraudulent HECM applications, a reverse loan is executed on the property and funds are paid out in a lump sum to the organizers of the fraud. Some of the buyers are innocent, Medici said, and are forced out of the home because they can't pay for upkeep, insurance and taxes.

[See Is a Reverse Mortgage Right for You?]

Tags:
mortgages,
fraud,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I rarely participate in these comments, but I really have to share my story with 1 company which has tremendously helped me. I just turned 74, many obstacles have come in the way of my retirement including a divorce a few years ago which really hurt me financially, to be honest I had this feeling that my savings and SS income were not going to be enough. Months and months of research and dealing with big banks - nothing but a big headache and they wanted to charge an arm and leg - I was considering a standard home equity loan but then I started reading about reverse mortgages. Long story short, i found this company while searching online - reverse mortgage lenders direct - they were able to automatically compare lenders for me and quote me a fantastic quote. I am not saying you need to do a reverse mortgage (for me this has been excellent and recommendable) but if you do here is their number 877 700 0534 - you can find the site online search for reverse mortgage lenders direct.

stephenwilliams2345 of NY 1:24AM May 30, 2012

Is prohibited by HUD, because it implies to the consumer that they are dealing directly with the government, or that a particular vendor is government-approved.

However, use of the Equal Housing logo (the house with the two lines in the middle) is required.

Carol Hannibal of OR 6:30PM August 17, 2009

My name is Tony, my parents took out a reverse mortgage mid 2008 and it was the best thing they did. The home was free and clear.They took out the reverse mortgage with the credit line option. So far, to date the balance owed on the home which were just the closing cost has increased approx. $729.35 and the credit line has increased in availability $8,624.31. If they do not touch any further funds from their line in 10 years they will have an additional $92.548.17 in addition to the $ 211,589.61 that they could have taken as a lump sum if they wanted too. That's a total of $304,137.78. The home is not even worth the intial 290,000.00 that it was appraised at when they took out the reverse. Not everyone benefits from the reverse mortgage but if you dont know about them you should not comment on them.

Tony M of FL 3:31PM July 20, 2009

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement