-
Say Bye-Bye to Buy-Buy Holiday Messages
Tweet Share on Facebook November 30, 2009 Comment (2)As the holiday season picks up steam, so do the roaring commercial voices calling on us to consume. And what they're saying is that the economy is recovering, the recession is over, and it's time to open up our wallets, melt our credit cards, and get back into America's national pastime—conspicuous consumption. I am no Scrooge but, please, resist the siren calls of financial irresponsibility.
[See Best Affordable Places to Retire.] -
See Where the Jobs Are for Older Workers
Tweet Share on Facebook November 24, 2009 Comment (5)For the nearly 7 million experienced people age 65 and older who are still in the labor force, jobless rates have consistently been lower than for all workers. That's scant comfort if you're having trouble finding a job, or finding a job that pays you what you're worth. What's become painfully clear in this jobless recovery is that keeping a job is vital and that job-hopping is a thing of the past for most people. So, be thankful if you've got a job.
[See America's Best Affordable Places to Retire.]
To help provide a clearer picture of where the jobs are for older employees, by occupation, U.S. News gathered detailed information from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is public information but the BLS doesn't publish it, and it differs a bit from what you're used to seeing. For example, the national jobless rate in October was 10.2 percent. But the rate here is only 8.8 percent. That's because this unpublished data is not seasonally adjusted. The other primary difference, according to a BLS economist, is that the 10.2 figure includes people with no prior work experience and those who had just left military duty to look for work. The table below includes only people with prior work experience. That makes sense in looking at the job outlook for older employees, because virtually all of us have held jobs in the past.
-
Act Now to Reverse 2009 Minimum Plan Payouts
Tweet Share on Facebook November 23, 2009 Comment (1)Nov. 30 is the deadline for most people to reinvest any unwanted minimum payouts from retirement plans. When people with IRAs, 401(k)s, and other qualifying plans reach the age of 70½, they must begin taking at least minimum required distributions (RMDs) from these plans, according to IRS rules. But there was widespread sentiment to waive this requirement for 2009 RMDs because big 2008 investment losses would have forced many retirees to sell holdings at depressed prices.
[See Best Affordable Places to Retire.] -
Attractive and Functional Design Solutions for Aging Homeowners
Tweet Share on Facebook November 19, 2009 Comment (14)Making a home suitable for older occupants is becoming a mainstream part of the home remodeling business. Growing numbers of seniors want to remain in their homes as they age, and attractive design solutions for aging in place projects have evolved. Making such modifications not only helps current occupants but may broaden the market for future buyers when the home is placed on the market.
[Slide Show: Design Solutions for Aging Homeowners.]
Illustrating this trend, about 3,000 home remodeling and repair contractors have taken a three-day training course to become Certified Aging-in-Place Specialists. The CAPS program was begun by the National Association. of Home Builders and AARP. Therese Ford Crahan, executive director of NAHB's Remodelers Council, describes the sensitivity training that contractors must take as part of the program. "The remodelers are required to put a tennis ball in their nonwriting hand, put that hand in a sock, and then try and write a check," she says, simulating challenges that many people with arthritis face. "Next, we put them in a wheelchair" and they have to maneuver around. Then, "we put sunglasses on them and cover the lenses with Vaseline and then make them try to get around. . . . It's just an eye-opener for remodelers," she says. "They just don't understand . . . until they've been there."
-
Why Long-Term Care is So Hard to Provide
Tweet Share on Facebook November 19, 2009 Comment (4)Finding a better way to protect people from being forced into poverty by long-term care expenses would seem a laudable goal of health reform efforts. The difficulties in finding that better way provide just one of many lessons about why reform efforts are so hard. Long-term care is very expensive and most people will need to be cared for at some point in their lives. There is private long-term care insurance, but it's expensive and few people buy it. There is a relatively new market for group long-term care policies and while it shows some promise, its development has been hurt by the recession and cutbacks in all types of employer benefits.
[See Best Affordable Places to Retire.] -
Ailing States Retirees May Want to Avoid
Tweet Share on Facebook November 16, 2009 CommentIf you're nearing retirement or are considering relocating to a different state any time in the next several years, you need to do some careful thinking about how the recession and housing downturn have affected the finances of different states. The National Governors Association says it will take a decade for states to recover. Many states have had little choice but to raise taxes and fees in the teeth of the recession, and further increases are likely. Even so, public services will decrease, especially after one-time funds from the federal stimulus program stop flowing to the states.
-
Financial Basics Easy to Find Online
Tweet Share on Facebook November 16, 2009 CommentThe Boomerater™ Report, our weekly collaboration with online baby boomer resource Boomerater, this week explores how to get a financial education online. A Boomerater member recently asked: “Is there a good web site out there to find good financial education?” Other members shared their advice:
-
2010 Medicare Changes Demand Careful Review
Tweet Share on Facebook November 13, 2009 Comment (11)Like warnings from the boy who cried wolf, pleas to some 46 million older consumers to carefully review their Medicare insurance risk are falling on deaf ears. After all, this advice is given every year as we approach the annual open enrollment period for Medicare, November 15 to December 31. But this year, the stakes are very high. Insurers have substantially cut back choices in Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug plans and have generally raised premiums in the process. They are responding to continued inflation in healthcare costs and government rules that could reduce the profitability of their Medicare policies.
[See Your Guide to Maximizing Medicare.]
Nearly 11 million people use Medicare Advantage (MA) policies for their Medicare coverage, and most of them choose MA policies that include prescription drug coverage. Doing nothing about your MA policy is always an option, but it will be an expensive choice in 2010. The Kaiser Family Foundation has reviewed 2010 MA plans and says the average premium for people who keep their current coverage will rise by roughly a third—to $48 per month, up from $36 this year. That's on top of the $96.40 that most people pay every month for basic Medicare coverage. For higher-income Medicare beneficiaries, however, basic Medicare premiums in 2010 are set to rise by 15 percent. Kaiser says that monthly average premiums for Part D prescription coverage will rise 11 percent to $38.94 but notes that rates vary greatly—from $8.80 to $120.20—depending on plans and where beneficiaries live.
-
Retirement May Not Be a Casualty of Recession
Tweet Share on Facebook November 12, 2009 Comment (1)Double-digit unemployment, soaring budget deficits, and a fragile economic recovery all provide ammunition to the "sky is falling" truth tellers. Forget about retirement, we're told. Expect to work forever. Against this tide of doom, it is refreshing to come upon a fact-based assessment of our economic situation that says, in effect, "aint no big deal."
[See 6 Steps to a Better Retirement] -
Aging Populations Drive Social, Legal Changes
Tweet Share on Facebook November 10, 2009 Comment (3)Dealing with large and growing numbers of old and "old old" people (those above the age of 85) inevitably will change social norms. Decisions that seemed clear—when should people stop working and retire, for example—will become less clear. Attitudes toward older people will change, and this is already happening in our increasingly negative attitudes toward warehousing the elderly in nursing homes and other institutional settings. Our laws and rules will reflect emerging demographic realities as well. In fact, this is one of the first places we'd expect to see structured responses to the age wave.
[See Can Boomers Lead an Elder Revolution?]















