2010 Medicare Drug Plans Need Careful Study

December 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Four weeks remain to enroll in Medicare for 2010. For 26 million participants in Medicare's Part D prescription drug program, it's especially important to pay attention to the details of the insurance plans you're considering, especially the ways various insurers handle co-pays for specific drugs.

[See Best Affordable Places to Retire.]

Private insurers offer plans that may either be part of basic Medicare or be included in other Medicare coverage plans. About 50 different Part D plans are offered in most states. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the baseline elements of stand-alone Part D coverage in 2010 will include up to a $310 initial deductible (up from $295 in 2009) and then a 25 percent copay up to $2,830 in total drug costs (up from $2,700 in 2009). People then encounter what's called the "doughnut hole" in Part D coverage and must pay all of their drug costs until their out-of-pocket spending reaches $4,550 (up from $4,350 in 2009). This spending total excludes Part D premiums.

Average monthly premiums for Part D coverage will rise 11 percent to $38.94, according to Kaiser. But that average includes rates as low as $8.80 and as high as $120.20, Kaiser says, reflecting wide variations in coverage and geographic cost differences.

But the premium is just the starting point for evaluating the most appropriate Part D plan. Consumers should make sure their Part D insurance plan covers the specific drugs they require. There are 2,363 drugs covered by various Part D plans, according to Avalere Health, a Washington consulting firm. Only one of the top 10 plans covers all of these drugs—AARP's MedicareRx Preferred. Other best-selling plans may cover as few as half that number, Avalere says.

The official Medicare site has a prescription-plan finder tool that locates various insurance plans by ZIP code. It includes a feature enabling you to determine whether your prescription drugs are covered by various Medicare insurance plans, and under what payment terms.

[See Best Places to Retire.]

Since Part D plans were begun in 2006, private insurers have expanded their use of tiers, which they use to assign drugs into categories grouped by expense and co-pay terms. For 2010, 51 percent of plans will have four tiers and 33 percent five tiers, according to Avalere. Most tiers feature co-pays but the highest tier often provides a percentage co-insurance payment, Avalere says. Here is what it says to look for in 2010 plans with four tiers:

  • Tier One: Generics, $6.72 co-pay in 2010, up from $5.77 in 2009.
  • Tier Two: Preferred brands, $36.25 co-pay, up from $34.83.
  • Tier Three: Non-preferred brands; $78.95 co-pay, up from $74.31.
  • Tier Four: Specialty and injectable drugs, 30.4 percent co-insurance in 2010, down from 31.2 percent in 2009.

Here are Avalere's averages for those five-tier plans with a single co-insurance tier (about 40 percent of five-tier plans) :

  • Tier One: Preferred generics, $2.72 co-pay in 2010, up from $0.54 in 2009.
  • Tier Two: Non-preferred generics, $21.52 co-pay, up from $11.86.
  • Tier Three: Preferred brands, $32.53 co-pay, up from $30.02.
  • Tier Four: Non-preferred brands, $73.81 co-pay, up from $71.01.
  • Tier Five: Specialty and injectable drugs, 28 percent co-insurance in 2010, down from 28.2 percent in 2009.

Here are Avalere's averages for the five-tier plans with two co-insurance tiers (about 33 percent of five-tier plans):

  • Tier One: Generics, $5.40 co-pay in 2010, down from $6.58 in 2009.
  • Tier Two: Preferred brands, $37.75 co-pay, down from $39.07.
  • Tier Three: Non-preferred brands, $87.71 co-pay, up from $82.46.
  • Tiers Four and Five: Specialty and injectable drugs, 28.7 percent co-insurance in 2010, nearly identical to 2009.

[See 2010 Medicare Changes Demand Careful Review.]

Tags:
retirement,
Medicare

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I just talked to a Medicare consultant at medicare.gov and was told I would be charged 1% for each year past my original enrollment period of "65". My grace period was 63 days after "65" to enroll. If my pancreas stopped producing insulin in 20 years and I needed insulin to stay alive, that would be a penalty of 20% added to a drug plan premium at that time. If that premium was $85.00, I would have to pay an extra $17.00 to that premium each month for the rest of my life. She did not mention an average of ALL premiums in my area.

I don't understand the reason for the penalty. Why do I "HAVE TO" sign up now? Why can't I wait until I need it? If I get cancer in 20 years and need chemotherapy, why do I need to pay those premiums now? It has to be all about money and how much the insurance and drug companies can make! I think it's extortion and criminal. Our government is not reputable.

The senate and the house only care about themselves; not the American people who voted for them. They have their own Healthcare Plan and Million Dollar Retirement Plan which leaves all of us in the dust. Not right and not fair; absolutely immoral. They vote whatever they want for themselves without our approval or knowledge. I hope all incumbants get replaced at the polls by clean, fresh Americans who want to represent the people for the people! Imagine that happening!

Sandra Engle of TX 3:19PM December 12, 2009

I am very concerned about what is happening to seniors in regard to Medicare Part D -- and that this issue is rarely, if ever, discussed

I live in Arizona and turned 71 this year. I have paid for insurance my entire life without a lapse. At 65 I entered medicare and signed up for a supplemental policy. I read the literature sent to me about Part D. Although it was confusing, my understanding was that if I did not sign up for part D I "might" (the literature says "you may") pay a penalty of 1% for every month I failed to choose a policy. This seemed fair enough to me. The original premiums were relatively low and 1% seemed plausible. At that time I was using, and continued to use, Janet Napolitano's Arizona Coppercard for my medications. I was perfectly satisfied with that plan and saw no need for a different plan. This year I decided to choose a low cost policy and pay my penalty for delay.

I am shocked and angry at what I have discovered.

To wit:

1) There is no "might" pay a penalty involved; unless you are judged by medicare to be impoverished or to lack "creditable coverage", a confusing issue, ( I thought I had that with my medical insurance card) there is no choice except to pay a penalty.

2) The penalty is NOT 1% of whichever plan I choose -- it is 1% of the average of all plans COMBINED --a detail not clear to me in the original literature. Most of the plans are considerably more expensive than the plan I found affordable and the premiums have increased dramatically every passing year since inception thereby increasing the penalty every year. The net result of this arithmetic is that my penalty is more per month than the premium for my plan.

3) The cost of this penalty (punishment) is RESET every year to be in line with the continually rising costs of the premiums.

4) Who would ever have imagined that the penalty extracted goes on every single month FOR THE REST OF ONE'S LIFE? It is unconscionable to expect seniors to pay a penalty ever-increasing and never ending and unspecified into an unknown future!

This is not a "penalty". This is extortion by the drug and insurance companies and enabled by our elected officials.

What normal, sane person would have ever imagined being caught in such a blatantly unfair scheme?

Is this issue being raised in the healthcare debate on the floor of either the house or senate? Is it being discussed in committee? If so, where and when? If not, why not?

Jean Shepherd

Tucson, AZ

Jean Shepherd of AZ 4:49PM December 04, 2009

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age. He also is a research fellow at the Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement