Housing Recovery Will Revive Retirement Plans

December 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Buy a house, pay the monthly mortgage, watch your home's value grow, and eventually sell it and fund your retirement dreams. It seemed to be the natural order of things until the bubble burst. For older homeowners, the new order of things is to either sell your home at a huge loss or stay put and hope things will get better before you're too old and frail to have any retirement dreams left. For recent homeowners, there is no dream. But there is a nightmare: Buy a house at an inflated value, pay a teaser mortgage until you can't afford it, watch your home's value fall like a rock, and then sink with that rock as you either default, renegotiate your loan, or sink further underwater each month. Renting never looked so good.

[See Best Affordable Places to Retire.]

Still, things are recovering, albeit slowly. And older homeowners can at least begin to plan an exit strategy. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index showed recovery in the third quarter—its second consecutive quarterly gain—and while prices are nearly 9 percent below a year ago, they are finally moving in the right direction.

In the 20 markets tracked by the index, S&P says, "Las Vegas remains the most depressed market. Prices have declined for 37 consecutive months, with a peak-to-trough reading of -55.4 percent." Prices in Las Vegas were nearly 29 percent lower in the third quarter than a year earlier, while the other largest year-over-year declines were in Phoenix (down 22 percent) and Detroit (off 19 percent). The best performances were turned in by Dallas and Denver (down only 1 percent) and Boston (off 3 percent).

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) tracks median home prices in nearly 170 metropolitan areas. While median prices during the third quarter were down more than 11 percent from a year earlier, the NAR says it's seeing gains in the volume of home sales, including nine straight monthly increases in pending home sales.

Another key element of future shifts in housing demand involves the pace at which people are moving around the country. Here, too, the bursting of the real estate bubble and steep recession literally stopped people in their tracks. William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution in Washington, recently reported that Americans moved less during the past two years than at any time since World War II. In addition to the factors depressing the housing market, he notes that the flood of immigrants into the U.S. effectively disappeared during the recession. Without economic opportunity here, people simply stayed away, or even returned to the countries of their birth.

[See Best Places to Retire.]

The search for employment became the dominant driver of interstate moves, Frey said in a recent research paper. It explained 46 percent of all such moves in 2008 and 2009, while the search for new homes was the deciding factor in only 14 percent of interstate moves. In earlier years, priorities were weighted differently.

Looking at overall metropolitan patterns is only part of the story about migration shifts, Frey said. It's also important to look at shifts within metro areas. The historical advantages of suburban homes may have given way to core center cities and other densely populated areas. In many metro areas, the migration rates into suburban areas have fallen much more sharply than for cities.

If seniors want to see better markets for selling their homes, Frey says, their fate rests to some extent on where millenials and other younger people want to live. Frey says roughly 40 percent of migration in the near future will be by these younger consumers. The "hot" markets of the early years of this decade were in warm climates of California, Texas, and Florida, for the most part. Their appeal has faded although they are likely to benefit as housing markets recover and the pace of moves picks up.

[See Seniors Stay Put in Tough Times.]

Tags:
housing market,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thank God we saved for retirement. We'll barely break even when we sell our home. Hopefully, we'll be in a position to buy a forcelosure home.

Audrey Auernehimer of KS 1:37AM April 08, 2011

The idea that houses should be "investment" that provide a sufficient return to help you retire is an absurdity. It seems that neither the author nor many people considered the idea that someone else needs to get ripped off with an unfairly high price, before you can make big money on your home.

The greater fool theory was fed by realtors and Wall Street banks, and now it has collapsed. Buy a house to live in. Buy one that is within your means. Put the biggest downpayment you can afford, to reduce your monthly payment. That is the wise man's path. Lower home prices are good, not bad. It would be even better if they fell much deeper, as they are still bloated.

Judd Jenkins of CA 1:11AM December 30, 2009

This is one of the ills that has tumbled this economy. People buying McMansions for investment. They created a pyramid scam using white elephant homes which would be passed on to the next greedy flip artist. Currently many of the unemployed tradesman and craftsmen were rushed in to support the unsustainable get rich flip-it market adding to the woes. Truly wealthy don't need to flip the property to retire!

Now consider that many of these same individuals are job gluttons. They simply can't exit the job market due to their spending. Buying that estate required holding on to lucrative jobs that young people would need to advance or enter the work force (adding to underemployment by working 50-60 hour weeks). Jobs that actually can afford to pay a mortgage are clogged with aging boomers who own lots of toys and collectibles that are in the garages and spare bedrooms of these hillbilly heavens, and few, now, are buying the liquidation home and toy box for pennies on the dollar. They "will never get old", or so they think (complain about W St., low min. wage, you finance my children and grand-babies health care and college, me me me)! A lost generation void is created, greedy will not allow passing!

Meanwhile, the conservative, frugal, downsized-slob (not supporting several ex's and the Brady Bunch) is locked out of promotion or employment and accumulates rusty skills, takes a smaller pension, and faces early retirement in an uncertain environment of high taxation and escalating costs. Where prohibitive education costs rule out new/advanced job training options and age discrimination hovers while too few remaining working years swallow training cost re-coop! A lost generation!

All so big shot can have a big house, that now won't sell or needs bail-out. Mid-boomer McMansion has very little nest egg and must sell for savings to cover the utility bills on a retirement cottage. Still Little Bitty you greedy piggy!

Ubiquitous Quip of IN 12:20AM December 17, 2009

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement