Good Health Raises Lifetime Care Costs

May 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

No good deed goes unpunished. According to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, healthier people actually will incur higher health care costs during their lives than people who are unhealthy. This flies in the face of many of my bromides in past columns about the financial benefits of taking good care of yourself. So, perhaps I should be leading the charge to a nearby all-you-can-eat restaurant?

[See $250 Medicare Checks Highlight 2010 Reforms.]
 

Nope. The main reason that healthier people have higher medical expenses over their lives, the CRR research found, is that they live a lot longer. Because of this longevity, they are more likely to need nursing home or other long term care, which is very expensive.

"At age 80, people in healthy households have a remaining life expectancy that is 29 percent longer than people in unhealthy households, and, therefore, are at risk of incurring health care costs over more years." the CRR study says. Chronic diseases will eventually afflict these healthy people as they move into their 80s and become frail.

Here are the CRR projections of remaining lifetime health care costs, in 2009 dollars, of couples who reached the indicated ages last year:

Age      Healthy      Unhealthy

65       $260,000     $220,000
70       $266,000     $241,000
75       $265,000     $236,000
80       $259,000     $220,000
85       $244,000     $202,000

Looking at current health care costs, it turns out that healthier people actually do face lower annual bills than unhealthy people. But as you extend this side-by-side look into the future, the healthy people keep incurring expenses every year. And the unhealthy people? Well, they're likely to have died.

[See Long Term Care Costs Cheapest at Home.]

Now, it is certainly true that death really drives down those pesky health care costs. But I wouldn't recommend it as a lifetime strategy.

However, the CRR findings are a useful wake-up call to people thinking about their future health insurance needs. Being healthy today and taking great care of yourself is no excuse for scrimping on your insurance protection. You're going to need it, and if you wait until you finally become ill and frail, you may not be able to qualify for the private insurance plans you'd want to supplement Medicare coverage.

"Households that delay purchasing insurance until their health declines run the risk of facing higher pre­miums, or for long-term care insurance, being denied coverage altogether," the study says. "Therefore, households that do not buy Medigap when they first join Medicare run the risk of facing substantially higher premiums, as do households of any age that postpone buying long-term care insurance."

[Use our Mutual Fund Score to find the best investments for you.]
 

Tags:
aging,
health,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Could someone discuss the pros and cons of putting money, tax-free, aside in an HSA? It seems like a no-brainer but no one writes about it. With the one time tax-free $7500 conversion from a traditional IRA it seems enticing.

Here in California, we are getting hammered with all levels of governmental fees and taxes rising with no increase in quality.

Thank you.

Pat of CA 10:42PM May 30, 2010

What is an appropriate age to get long term care insurance? Of course, premiums would be lesser at a younger age. And it may be easier to qualify. But then one may land up paying more to the insurance company over the lifetime.

As a general rule, age should not be a factor in determining if or when someone should purchase any type of insurance.

There are 2 objective factors to help determine if someone should purchase long-term care insurance:

Do you have the more important financial planning priorities in place:

• quality medical insurance,

• disability insurance (if you’re not yet able to retire),

• life insurance (if someone is dependent upon your income),

• all high-interest debt is paid off, and,

• you are maximizing your contributions to your retirement accounts each year (if you’re not yet able to retire)

If those higher priorities are not taken care of, then you should NOT purchase long-term care insurance no matter what age you are.

The next question to ask yourself is: do you have enough income (or assets) to justify the cost of the policy? As a general rule, if you are married and your total household income is under $50,000 per year (including re-investment income), you probably shouldn't purchase long-term care insurance because you could probably qualify for Medicaid without too much loss in lifestyle or assets.

Scott A. Olson

LTCInsuranceShopper

Scott A Olson of CA 11:47AM May 22, 2010

If you live beyond the age of 65, there's a 70% chance that you will need long term care at some point in your life. This is a strong probability, not a certainty but I sure wish people were better educated and planned better. Denial is the hardest obstacle to overcome. There's a lot of people that don't want to think about this planning and that delay- that ignorance - is having a real cost on the entire system right now.

Allison Payne, LTC Financial Partners of WA 3:26PM May 13, 2010

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement