Working Past 65 is Nothing New

September 5, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

More older Americans want to work than ever before. It's tempting this Labor Day to attribute this rise to the current recession. There is no question more people of all ages have been driven to seek work because of the weakness of the economy and the continued hangover from our twin investment and real estate collapses. But there are other forces at work, and they're part of a sustained change that's been going on for more than 20 years.

[Bookmark the U.S. News Retirement site for more planning ideas and advice.]

The current jobless figures take the headlines, and rightly so. But looking back several decades helps put today's figures in context. In the case of people's desire to find work, the key measure to look at is called the labor force participation rate. This is a self-selected category that is measured in regular government surveys that ask people if they want to work. If they do, they're included in the labor force.

U.S. News looked at labor force participation rates for persons aged 55 and older, going back to 1950 for the broadest measures, and back to the 1980s for some measures of specific groups of older workers.

Low labor force participation rates generally mean that people feel fairly well off, but they also can reflect social patterns. Women, by way of a huge example, have posted a sustained rise in participation rates that's lasted decades. The fact the rate was low in the 1950s didn't mean that women felt well off but that prevailing social norms did not encourage them to work.

[See 8 Financial Tips for Seniors Who Work.]

Likewise with older workers, changing attitudes are a likely cause of higher participation rates. So are longer life spans and improved health of people in their later years.

In all cases, the lowest labor force participation rates among older persons were posted 15 to 25 years ago. Since then, there has been a steady increase, and it became more pronounced in the past few years. Here are the details for the age groups tracked by the government (seasonally unadjusted):

55 and older. The lowest participation rate since 1950 was 29.2 percent, which was posted in the third quarter of 1993. The rate was 37.1 percent in the second quarter of 2005, and had risen to 40.3 percent in the second quarter of this year.

55 to 64. A low of 54 percent occurred in the third quarter of 1987. The rate was 62.9 percent in mid-2005 and 65.4 percent last quarter.

65 and older. A low of 10.7 percent was reached in the first quarter of 1987. The rate was 15.1 percent five years ago and 17.1 percent last quarter.

65 to 69. A low of 17.8 percent of this age group was in the labor force in the first quarter of 1985. The figure had jumped to 27.6 percent by mid-2005 and to 31.3 percent in June of this year.

70 to 74. Only 9.8 percent of this age group was in the labor force in the first quarter of 1987. By the middle of 2005, the rate had nearly doubled to 17.0 percent. In the second quarter of this year, it stood at 18.1 percent.

75 and older. The labor force participation rate of our oldest employees has also doubled, but from a very small base. In the fourth quarter of 1988, only 4 percent of this age group was in the labor force. By the middle of 2005, that total was 6.6 percent, and it has edged up further in the past five years to 6.9 percent.

[See Retired Workers Will Be Wooed to Return.]

Tags:
labor,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Could it be that more seniors are working because the pensions they were promised 20 – 30 years ago have either shrunk or disappeared altogether (as in stolen)? For those over 65 could it be that while Medicare is a lifesaver it only pays about 80% of health care expenses and the cost for seniors caring for sick spouses could bring bankruptcy were it not for expensive supplemental insurance? Could it be that seniors under 65 are opting to work longer in order to keep employer-sponsored health care insurance?

Sometime ago it was “decided” by suits and ties that normal Social Security retirement age would be 65. Workers had no say in the matter. Those same suits and ties raised it to 67, and again workers had no say, Now the deficit commission is talking about raising it to 70! Raising Social Security retirement age will not affect those of us who are already retired. It, would, however, sentence our children and grandchildren to more years of hard labor. As seniors we want future generations to have no less than what we have, and hopefully they will have more.

Working them to death won't get the job.

If a person chooses to work beyond 62. 65, or 67 that decision should be a matter of preference, not a condition of economic need. The key here is choice, not necessity.

We have a looooooooong way to go before we as a nation become an enlightened civilization. It would be wise if vox populi heeded the words of Jack Hall: “Know your class and be loyal it.”

Rich of WA 12:32PM October 16, 2010

Roger that, and ditto.

One size does not fit all, ever. but these differences become ever more visible as we age.

LoveStarLaurel of TX 6:48PM September 14, 2010

Yeah, maybe if you have a desk job in the right company you can hang on to 70 and beyond, but not if your strong back is your major asset. Distasteful as it may be to contemplate, even the healthiest can't work to 75 on a loading dock, driving a truck, laying asphalt or picking lettuce.

Their workplace participation rates are high because they're panicking. There are few jobs available, they have no 401(k)s, and the Republicans are running around saying that they should die in the streets rather than get health insurance and that it's their own moral failure for being poor.

Not wanting to look at them doesn't make them disappear.

Panskeptic of MT 11:53PM September 05, 2010

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement