5 Big Money Uncertainties for Retirees

December 20, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

As 2010 draws to a close, people in or nearing retirement face a particularly uncertain financial future. The government has approved a package of tax breaks, jobless benefits, and other stimulus spending. But these fixes will last only a year or two and virtually guarantee big shifts down the road. Meanwhile, the landmark health reform law will be under sustained legal attacks for years, adding to already existing questions about the effects of its implementation. Deficit reduction efforts appear unavoidable, if unpleasant. And the economic recovery continues its painfully slow progress.

[See 10 Tips for Retirement Overseas.]

No wonder retirement-age people keep working or are trying to get back into the work force. They're also continuing to reduce their use of credit and tighten up on spending. People are playing defense—cutting spending a bit now to reduce the odds of having to live even more frugally in the future. Looking ahead, here are five major unresolved money issues that are crucial to retirees:

Taxes. Current tax rates will be extended until the end of 2012, but then all bets are off. Deficit reduction proposals suggest two possibilities. If Congress can agree to sharply reduce or eliminate more than $1 trillion in current tax breaks, it would be possible to simplify and lower personal income tax rates and still reduce the deficit. If such agreement cannot be fashioned, personal income tax rates would need to be increased.

Medicare. Under health reform, projected increases in Medicare spending would be trimmed by some $500 billion in the coming decade. A good portion of that savings will come from lower federal subsidies to insurers who sell Medicare Advantage plans that supplement basic Medicare. This shift is already being felt—insurers have cut back on their offerings and some are reducing covered benefits. But the major deficit reduction plans so far proposed would make further Medicare cuts. On the plus side, health reform will begin next year to provide an expanded list of free preventive wellness exams and tests. Brand-name prescription drug expenses will also be reduced for many Medicare recipients. But while a healthier group of retirees eventually would reduce financial pressures on Medicare, it's not likely that such gains will appear soon enough to forestall higher Medicare insurance costs to retirees.

[See Retirees Largely Shut Out of Obama Tax Compromise.]

Social Security. The stimulus package will provide a one-year tax holiday that will cut the employee portion of Social Security taxes by two percentage points. This would cost the government $110 billion to $120 billion. This cut does not affect Social Security benefits, but it will increase pressure to make Social Security cuts part of a long-term deficit reduction program. One of the most likely reductions is a change in the annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) that would trim the size of future COLAs. This change could affect current retirees. Other major changes—reducing benefits, raising the retirement age, and increasing the wage base subject to Social Security taxes—are not expected to occur soon enough to have a big impact on current retirees. They might, however, effect people who are getting close to retirement.

Home prices. Historically, home equity has been a major retirement asset. But millions of retirees have not been able to make sound financial plans about their homes in recent years. Not only have housing prices been cut, there is little sense of when they may recover or by how much. Mortgage foreclosures are still occurring so slowly that it's hard to get a clear idea of where prices eventually will settle. Meanwhile, President Obama's deficit reduction commission proposed a big cut in tax deduction for mortgage interest. Even the possibility of such a cut may depress home values.

Inflation. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says he's 100-percent confident that the central bank can keep inflation under control. Unfortunately, he can't control the opinions of foreign investors, particularly in China. They own trillions of dollars in U.S. securities. If their opinion of our economic prospects is negative—and this clearly has been the prevailing view—they will demand higher interest rates to continue holding U.S. securities. As more U.S. dollars flow out to fund U.S. debts held overseas, the value of the dollar comes under pressure as well. And if it continues to fall, it will take more and more dollars to pay for oil and other imports. This can make U.S. exports cheaper and help our trade deficits. But it also will contribute to higher prices. In fact, heightened uncertainty over future inflation rates can itself contribute to higher inflation.

Twitter: @PhilMoeller

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My question is this:

If you were fortunate enough to invent a product showing massive demand and the potential for million$$ annually in revenue...would you make sure the product was mfg'd in the US at US cost or would you move the production to an overseas mfg'r of equal quality for, let's be conservative, a 30% increase in your bottom line profits??

The idea of having all US products built in the US is lovely but since Americans EXPECT more $$$ from their job, no matter how much they DESERVE, is what makes the logic of having any product built, within its needed specs, at the lowest cost...it's simple financial economics. The increase in profits for any company can be spent on hiring or expanding, company funded retirement plans, bonuses...you reduce the profits and you reduce any companies ability to expand and grow...it's just that simple.

if you are upset about simple labor factory jobs going overseas, go get a degree or advanced skill set to become a more valuable employee...

Hughes of AL 3:52PM February 02, 2011

I don't know how old JR Gordon of FL is, but I would suggest to him that the generation of the currently retired and baby boomers is the responsible generation that proportionally has and will put more money into the system than the present generation(s) are so doing or will do. Hence, we are not freeloading off of the next generation, we are receiving what we rightfully scrimped, saved and planned for in our retirement. It is the greedy wealthy few and the monopolistic corporations that are "taking from the next generation" by not paying their share of taxes, cutting domestic jobs and sending them overseas in order to make huge profits to fill their own pockets even fuller.

JRT of LA 11:48PM January 04, 2011

Hopefully, 2011 will see a return to sanity in government - or at least a start. Baby boomers and current retirees cannot continue to take from the next generation through enormous spending programs. To me, AARP's principal two objectives are to provide high incomes to its executives and to rob future generations of Americans.

America has a rich history of individual responsibility - complimented by a safety net for those disadvantaged through no fault of their own. However, we cannot continue to reward those who overtly ignore their education, health, and finances.

JR Gordon of FL 3:59PM January 04, 2011

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement