When Downsizing, Renting Often Beats Buying

June 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

One of the financial cornerstones of many successful retirements is paying off mortgage debt before leaving the workforce. Life on a fixed income is a lot easier if you're not making that big payment every month to a bank or other home lender.

That's easier said than done in today's market. Still, many people with mortgages seek to sell their homes and live mortgage-free in a smaller, less expensive home during their retirement years. If this transition might be in your future, it makes sense to carefully consider whether you should buy or rent your new home. Renting looks better than you might think.

[See 50 Best Funds for the Everyday Investor.]

Of course, you may never actually get to the stage of closely comparing the finances of owning or renting a home. There are major lifestyle, wealth, and estate issues that might decisively tilt the decision in favor of either renting or ownership:

1. Do you like tending your own home, including gardening, lawn work, and home maintenance? Or would you like to get out from many of these responsibilities?

2. Do you like the flexibility of an annual lease that gives you the freedom each year of living wherever you want? Or do you prefer to be a long-term member of a community and stay in the same home for a long time?

Even if your answers to these questions cause you to lean strongly toward being a homeowner or renter, it's still a smart idea to go through the process of evaluating the financial trade-offs of this decision.

[See the top-rated Fidelity funds from U.S. News.]

U.S. News Money reviewed nearly a dozen buy vs. rent calculators at leading personal finance websites. Most of them did not permit buying a new home for cash. None of them let us figure out the benefits to renters of investing the amount of the new home and using the earnings to help pay the rent.

To help make sense of the trade-offs, we've developed a downsizing case study. It assumes you will be able to sell your home and have $250,000 left over after paying off your mortgage and all closing costs. You can either buy a new home with this amount or put the $250,000 in a safe investment fund and use the fund's earnings to help pay your rental expenses.

Owners of a $250,000 home would need to pay roughly 2 percent of their home's value each year for property taxes and the amount that home insurance exceeds the cost of renter's insurance. That totals $5,000 a year. Set aside another $5,000 for annual home maintenance expenditures. Utilities—heating, cooling, water and sewage, cable, Internet, and phone expenses—would generally be higher for homeowners than renters. To make the comparison easy, tack on $2,000 a year for those higher homeowner utilities. The total of these higher expenses for homeowners is $1,000 a month.

Three other key assumptions:

1. Renters will earn 6 percent annual returns on their $250,000.

2. State and local taxes will be 20 percent on investment income.

3. Inflation will affect renters and homeowners equally.

[See 6 Numbers Every Investor Should Follow.]

If that $250,000 earns 6 percent a year, the individual could withdraw $1,250 a month forever and still have $250,000 left in the account. That's $1,000 after paying 20 percent in taxes. Adding in the $1,000 a month in lower renters' expenses provides renters with a $2,000 break-even rental budget.

So, what kind of home can you get with $2,000 a month in rent? A pretty nice one. Moody's Analytics maintains a set of "buy to rent" ratios for more than 50 metro areas throughout the country. It uses home prices from the National Association of Realtors and rental information from Property and Portfolio Research.

For each metro area, the ratio compares the median price of a single-family home with the annual rental cost of a typical apartment. The higher the ratio, the more expensive homes are relative to apartments. (New York Times economics writer David Leonhardt has used these ratios for several years in annual rent versus ownership pieces.)

Moody's emphasizes that its ratios are of limited use. They do not, for example, have any way of comparing the quality of a market's housing stock. Perhaps the median-priced home is nicer than the average apartment, for example. Still, the ratios provide a rough idea of where you'd come out by renting instead of buying.

These ratios are most commonly used in comparisons of homes purchased with a mortgage. In such cases, according to Leonhardt and others, buying beats renting when the ratio is 15 or lower. But the advantages of buying at these ratios decreases in a downsizing scenario when a home is purchased with cash and there is no tax deduction for mortgage interest expenses.

Based on the most current set of ratios, the depressed housing market in Cleveland is the only metro area tracked by Moody's where the rental equivalent of a $250,000 home is more than $2,000 a month.

Interestingly, homes outside of these 50 metro markets are even more reasonably priced, with the median U.S. home costing slightly more than 13.8 times an equivalent rental unit. For our case study, this translates into $2,055 in monthly rent on a home equivalent to one selling for $250,000.

Here is the current list of buy-to-rent ratios as of the first quarter of the year. The ratio over the 15-year period from 1989 through 2003 is also listed. It will help provide a view of the long-term relationship of home prices and rental costs. Also, we've calculated the monthly rental in each market for a home equivalent to one costing $250,000.

In nearly all cases, renters would come out ahead, and still have their $250,000 as a retirement nest egg.

 

Metro Area Buy to Rent Ratios 2011 Equivalent Rent for $250,000 Home
  First Quarter 2011 1989-2003 Average
Atlanta, GA 12.44 13.47 $1,675
Austin, TX 20.58 15.19 $1,012
Boston, MA 17.03 15.24 $1,223
Baltimore, MD 15.17 10.14 $1,373
Bridgeport, CT 16.48 16.08 $1,264
Charlotte, NC 29.39 15.86 $709
Chicago, IL 13.30 16.71 $1,566
Cincinatti, OH 13.17 14.15 $1,582
Cleveland, OH 10.27 13.44 $2,029
Columbus, OH 15.00 15.32 $1,389
Dallas - Fort Worth, TX 15.16 15.37 $1,374
Denver, CO 21.54 16.31 $967
Detroit, MI 11.94 13.21 $1,745
East Bay, CA 29.59 27.05 $704
Fort Lauderdale, FL 13.09 12.23 $1,592
Hartford, CT 17.22 13.40 $1,210
Honolulu, HI 30.91 23.37 $674
Houston, TX 15.82 13.18 $1,317
Inland Empire, CA 13.95 16.59 $1,493
Jacksonville, FL
13.93 12.37 $1,496
Kansas City, KS 14.25 13.46 $1,462
Las Vegas, NV 13.51 14.82 $1,542
Long Island, NY 20.71 12.50 $1,006
Los Angeles, CA 12.50 13.99 $1,667
Manhattan, NY 28.52 22.14 $730
Memphis, TN 18.54 16.85 $1,124
Miami, FL 11.98 11.93 $1,739
Milwaukee, WI 20.38 15.38 $1,022
Minneapolis, MN 12.58 13.38 $1,656
Nashville, TN 23.68 18.50 $880
New Orleans, LA 15.37 12.97 $1,355
New York, NY 15.11 9.68 $1,379
Norfolk, VA 18.04 16.28 $1,155
North - Central New Jersey 22.67 17.07 $919
Oklahoma City, OK 15.26 11.73 $1,365
Orange County, CA 28.36 19.60 $735
Orlando, FL 12.33 12.32 $1,690
Palm Beach County, FL 14.93 13.61 $1,395
Philadelphia, PA 14.76 11.04 $1,411
Phoenix, AZ 11.87 11.89 $1,755
Pittsburg, PA 11.25 10.11 $1,852
Portland, OR 23.12 16.74 $901
Raleigh, NC 24.64 16.80 $846
Richmond, VA 21.60 14.31 $965
Sacramento, CA 15.15 16.16 $1,375
Salt Lake City, UT 16.69 14.23 $1,248
San Antonio, TX 17.61 12.58 $1,183
San Diego, CA 21.96 17.51 $949
San Francisco, CA 23.97 24.76 $869
San Jose, CA 29.57 22.79 $705
Seattle, WA 25.43 17.43 $819
St. Louis, MO 13.49 13.17 $1,544
Tampa, FL 11.95 12.35 $1,743
Washington, DC - Northern VA - MD 17.24 13.40 $1,208
       
Metropolitan Area Average 13.83 12.00 $1,506
U.S. 10.14 9.4 $2,055

 

Twitter: @PhilMoeller

Tags:
housing market,
housing,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I must concur with the prior commenters. I am a CPA and must say that I am somewhat surprised at how savvy these commenters are especially sense the author seems to be lacking the expertise to be giving such advice. 6% earnings on investments, hardly a safe investment these days...I could make a fortune if I were able to guarantee that percentage. Also your assumptions seems to be a little misguided, 1. inflation will not effect renters and homeowners the same, on there income sure, but not on the annual increase in rent, it happens like clockwork...I think it always has but a especially with the increase in renters these days. Also I would love to live in this world where you pulled the 2011 equivalent rent per $250,000 home!! Just doesn't make sense. I grew an hour north of San Diego I. The inland empire and currently reside in Missoula Montana and the figures are laughable. I do find it quite hard to believe that Missoula Montana is more expensive to live then the other metro areas you described. I hate to bash your article as it appears you spent a considerable amount of time on it but it appears that there are too many errors for me to do an appropriate critique. At this point I guess I should be glad you're not pushing reverse mortgages on the elderly so they can spend their children's inheritance in Las Vegas or the local Indian casino! Maybe next time you can back some of those statements up with credible facts.

Ryan Bolton of MT 5:21AM May 06, 2013

Ah, just where does $250,000 earn 6%? If Vanguaud can pay me that percentage today without huge a huge risk factor, please contact me. Also, it would neeed to benefit me during my lifetime. I am already old.

And maybe rent has gone up up 25 to 50% national wide since june 2011 but no way are the rental figures near correct. Greenville SC rents $140,000 condos for $1150 up. Yet you claim a $250k house in Seattle can be rented for $819.00. Really? And in what condition. And how does renting a house get rid of yard work.

That is another consideration. Rent will continue to rise, a real problem for a fixed income budget. At least a mortgage at under 4% will stay the same.

Now let's look at your tax numbers. You realize folks age 65+ get a huge tax break on home ownership. Oops! You used the wrong tax info.

Nathan of SC 5:32PM November 29, 2012

IMPORTANT NOTE: If your $250,000 is growing by 6% a year, and you take the proceeds to pay for your rent, then your nest egg is losing value due to inflation... let's say 3% a year. So although the author writes that you get to "keep your nest egg", $250,000 amount depreciates to $190,000 after only 10 years. This your renting power is reduced little by little every year.

Max of MD 12:34AM October 14, 2012

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement