Social Security, Medicare Outlooks Worsen

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Longevity. A very important word, when we talk about retirement. 70 or 80 years before full retirement is possible, if employees are taken care of in the work place by their employers. Don't misunderstand me. Employees have an obilgation for their own safety. I started working in the fields at the age of about 10 along with my older brothers. We worked 12 to 16 hour days,6 to 7 days a week with no overtime, no health insurance, no safety equipment, and no safety rules. Our biggest hazard in the fields was rattlersnakes, which we had great respect for. We didn't know anything about summer vacations or holidays. Holidays, only during the school year. My first vacation was on December of 1960, while I was serving in the Marine Corps. One thing comes to mind, and that's that we want to enjoy our golden years to make up for all the years that we've worked. If we enjoy our life to the fullest when we're young, the latter years won't be so bad. My wife and I are raising three grandchildren and life isn't so bad, considering that one is a special needs child. We don't have the freedom that most people want, but they're worth it. The challenges seem to be greater, than when we were kids ourselves. Peer pressure on the kids seems to be the biggest challenge. The worst that's ever happened to me was that I almost a finger while serving in the Marines. I learned that you can't trust someone elses actions. I have worked in home construction, the steel mills, and the chemical industry. I've had supervisors try to get me in positions, where I could've gotten injured. If, I had done what I was told to do, I wouldn't be here today. My point is, that safety is the responsibility of both the employer and the employee. If we want to set a higher age for retirement, we need to take better care of the workers. Healthwise, we may be able to live 80 or 100 years, but disabled workers drain your resources. I'm here today only by the Grace of GOD. I'm here to do a job, and when it's done, He will call me home. I pray to God, that I'm ready when he calls me home.

Pablo Salinas of TX 3:20PM June 15, 2012

Longevity. A very important word, when we talk about retirement. 70 or 80 years before full retirement is possible, if employees are taken care of in the work place by their employers. Don't misunderstand me. Employees have an obilgation for their own safety. I started working in the fields at the age of about 10 along with my older brothers. We worked 12 to 16 hour days,6 to 7 days a week with no overtime, no health insurance, no safety equipment, and no safety rules. Our biggest hazard in the fields was rattlersnakes, which we had great respect for. We didn't know anything about summer vacations or holidays. Holidays, only during the school year. My first vacation was on December of 1960, while I was serving in the Marine Corps. One thing come to mind, and that's that we want to enjoy our golden years to make up for all the years that we've worked. If we enjoy our life to the fullest when we're young, the latter years won't be so bad. My wife and I are raising the grandchildren and life isn't so bad, considering that one is a special needs child. We don't have the freedom that most people want, but they're worth it. The challenges seem to be greater, than when we were kids ourselves. Peer pressure on the kids seems to be the biggest challenge. The worst that's ever happened to me was that I almost a finger while serving in the Marines. I learned that you can't trust someone elses actions. I have worked in home construction, the steel mills, and the chemical industry. I've had supervisors try to get me in positions, where I could've gotten injured. If, I had done what I was told to do, I wouldn't be here today. My point is, that safety is responsibility of both the employer and the employee. If we want to set a higher age for retirement, we need to take better care of the workers. Healthwise, we may be able to live 80 or 100 years, but disabled workers drain your resources. I'm here today only by the Grace of GOD. I'm here to do a job, and when it's done, He will call me home. I pray to God, that I'm ready when he calls me home.

Pablo Salinas of TX 2:06PM June 15, 2012

Longevity. A very important word, when we talk about retirement. 70 or 80 years before full retirement is possible, if employees are taken care of in the work place by their employers. Don't misunderstand me. Employees have an obilgation for their own safety. I started working in the fields at the age of about 10 along with my older brothers. We worked 12 to 16 hour days, no overtime, no health insurance, no safety equipment, and no safety rules. Our biggest hazard in the fields was rattlersnakes, which we had great respect for. We didn't know anything about summer vacations or holidays. Holidays, only during the school year. My first vacation was on December of 1960, while I was serving in the Marine Corps. One thing come to mind, and that's that we want to enjoy our golden years to make up for all the years that we've worked. If we enjoy our life to the fullest when we're young, the latter years won't be so bad. My wife and I are raising the grandchildren and life isn't so bad, considering that one is a special needs child. We don't have the freedom that most people want, but they're worth it. The challenges seem to be greater, than when we were kids ourselves. Peer pressure on the kids seems to be the biggest challenge. The worst that's ever happened to me was that I almost a finger while serving in the Marines. I learned that you can't trust someone elses actions. I have worked in home construction, the steel mills, and the chemical industry. I've had supervisors try to get me in positions, where I could've gotten injured. If, I had done what I was told to do, I wouldn't be here today. My point is, that safety is responsibility of both the employer and the employee. If we want to set a higher age for retirement, we need to take better care of the workers. Healthwise, we may be able to live 80 or 100 years, but disabled workers drain your resources. I'm here today only by the Grace of GOD. I'm here to do a job, and when it's done, He will call me home. I pray to God, that I'm ready when he calls me home.

Pablo Salinas of TX 1:37PM June 15, 2012

The Social Security and Medicare needs to be fixed now! While I understand what you are saying is true, you also need to tell the truth about where the money has gone. I don't care if you are Republican or Democrat, if you want to fix this problem, then make Pres. Bush pay back all the Social Security money that he took out of it to fund his Iraq oil war! This is not the ranting and raving of some nut, nor is it rumor, or something made up or something I heard, this is fact! Check it out for yourself, anyone can do it. Just ask Social Security if you want to know the real truth. He took billions of dollars out to fund the Iraq war.

Sandi of NC 2:30PM April 25, 2012

So how can these people fight against terrorism , bring freedom to other countries when their political credo is organized crime and planned genocide?

They want control over citizens and use the hypocritical discourse on "fight for freedom", "fight against terrorism" "social security" "social justice" and kill more people than nazzis and communists in together. They sell illusions to people, just like Hitler, Stalin, Marx and Engels did and --and in reality they steal, and kill, or kill and steal--it depends on the drug they use. They are robots , because they trust computers more than people, and they don't operate with names but rather with numbers. So Well...Come to the new world DisOrder.

camian of AZ 1:53PM April 24, 2012

“We will go into a country,” said Ferguson, “and say, here is your goddamn development plan. Throw it out the window. Start looking at the size of your population and figure out what must be done to reduce it.”

“If you don’t like that, if you don’t want to choose to do it through planning, then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia.” According to an NSC spokesman, the United States now shares the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the “population crisis” is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than “nuclear annihilation.” “Every hot spot in the world corresponds to a population crisis point,” said Ferguson who would rename Brzezinski’s arc of crisis doctrine the “arc of population crisis.”

This is corroborated by statements in the NSC Ad Hoc Group’s April 1980 report. There is “an increased potential for social unrest, economic and political instability, mass migration and possible international conflicts over control of land and resources,” says the NSC report. It then cites “demographic pressures” as key to understanding “examples of recent warfare in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, El Salvador, Honduras, and Ethiopia, and the growing potential for instability in such places as Turkey, the Philippines, Central America, Iran, and Pakistan.” Through extraordinary efforts, the Ad Hoc Group and OPA estimate that they may be able to keep a billion people from being born through contraceptive programs.

But as the Ad Hoc Group’s report states, the best efforts of the Shah of Iran to institute “clean programs” of birth control failed to make a significant dent in the country’s birth rate. The promise of jobs, through an ambitious industrialization program, encouraged migration toward “overcrowded cities” like Teheran. Now under Ayatollah Khomeini, the “clean programs” have been dismantled. The government may make progress because it has a program “to induce up to half of Teheran’s 6 million residents to relocate, as well as possible measures to keep rural migrants from moving to the cities.” Behind the back of the President, Ferguson and others involved with the OPA and NSC group maintain that the United States will continue a foreign policy based on a genocidal reduction of the world’s population.

“We have a network in place of cothinkers in the government,” said the OPA case officer. “We keep going, no matter who is in the White House.” But Ferguson reports that the “White House” does not really understand what they are saying and that the President “thinks that population policy means how do we speed up population increase.”

“As long as no one says differently,” said Ferguson, “we will continue to do our jobs.”

Of interest

We’ve never admired Stewart Brand or any other environmentalist dupe, but it is somewhat noteworthy when an old lefty comes to his senses and figures out that population reduction is the real threat.

camian of AZ 1:47PM April 24, 2012

Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population, the OPA official added. “The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death,” all of which might occur in El Salvador. Ferguson’s OPA monitors populations in the Third World and maps strategies to reduce them. Its budget for FY 1980 was $190 million; for FY 198l, it will be $220 million. The Global 2000 report calls for doubling that figure. The sphere of Kissinger In 1975, OPA was brought under a reorganized State Department Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs — a body created by Henry Kissinger.

The agency was assigned to carry out the directives of the NSC Ad Hoc Group. According to an NSC spokesman, Kissinger initiated both groups after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. The Club of Rome, controlled by Europe’s black nobility, is the primary promotion agency for the genocidal reduction of world population levels. The Ad Hoc Group was given “high priority” by the Carter administration, through the intervention of National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretaries of State Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie.

According to OPA expert Ferguson, Kissinger initiated a full about-face on U.S. development policy toward the Third World. “For a long time,” Ferguson stated, “people here were timid. They listened to arguments from Third World leaders that said that the best contraceptive was economic reform and development. So we pushed development programs, and we helped create a population time bomb. We are letting people breed like flies without allowing for natural causes to keep population down. We raised the birth survival rates, extended life-spans by lowering death rates, and did nothing about lowering birth rates.”

“That policy is finished. We are saying with Global 2000 and in real policy that you must lower population rates. Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective — then you can have some development.” Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nations access to nuclear energy technology–the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.

camian of CA 1:45PM April 24, 2012

Social security is a fake--it is actually a social insecurity, since people are assimilated to numbers like animals, and the number is exposed by the Government everywhere. That's how the Government helps people feel more secure. Try this at your home--say something against this "security" and you'll have problems at your work place, and people will refuse to hire you, you'll notice "movement" in your bank account, just for you to feel more secure and be silent. Somebody occasionally will break into your home or will break your car windows and so on...so this is the security we are talking about--and it is against citizens, it is to protect the corrupted power.

This SS allowed for a maximum centralization of personal data that Nazzi and the communists only dreamed of--and EUREKA!!!! We made it possible!!!!

Ion Ianolide- The PROPHET Prisoner

“The prisoner feels that in the foreseeable future the communist power will be annihilated. He is sad because he sees that those who had the power loom as masters of communization of the country and the world to come. ( USA and western European countries have more and more of the characteristics of totalitarian regimes—my note).

He is concerned because he understands that that a new tyrannical order that will be installed will be without opponents. The golden calf, the ancient god shows itself today as a powerful industry in the spirit of humanity. It is a pseudo-religion of material dogmas.

The State that has monopoly over sophisticated weapons, genetic engineering and the art of determining the conscience will be powerful and will destroy mankind. Nobody guarantees freedom of people in this civilization, no one can govern technological forces in this civilization.

Therefore humanity lives on the heights of despair. All the world's solutions are the Cross of Christ and Christians, many times we lose the way, or will idle about, we return to the Gospel and the Holy Spirit. “

Ioan Ianolide, 1985.

camian of HI 1:33PM April 24, 2012

The 2% paroll tax cut dose work!

Stephen of TX 12:44PM April 24, 2012

Social Security was sound until they combined it with the general fund. For decades we, the taxpayers. paid more into SS than they were paying out. They couldn't keep their dirty hands off of the trust fund so they used it to pad their spending sprees. Now they want to reduce benefits to make up for the shortfalls? That's robbery. Put it back.

I get sick and tired of hearing the GOP talk about "free market solutions." I had a 401k. I had a nice pension from the company I worked for - for 12 years. But Bush thought it was a great idea to allow companies to raid the pension funds (since most were under-funded anyway). They took away my pension. The CEO robbed us. 401k? Please. That's MY money. But the government tells me when I can and cannot touch it. I tapped into my 401k to pay hospital bills and the IRS took half of it. What sane person in this day and age trusts Wall Street to guard their retirement nest egg? Really? One would hope we could trust the government to keep it safe but as long as the GOP exists there will be nothing that is truly safe. Wall Street is foaming at the mouth wanting to grab the $3 trillion trust fund and stuff it in their back pockets and the GOP is on a mission to give it to them. They'll bankrupt SS for sure - one way or another. Wall Street has commanded it. Wall Street wants all of our retirement money in their back pockets.

Bottom line: I have paid Social Security taxes all my life. It's no different from a 401k. That's MY MONEY. When I retire I want MY MONEY BACK. That's not a handout any different than a person taking money out of an ATM. Yes - I am entitled to MY MONEY. And if the GOP thinks they're going to steal that from me they had better think again. The GOP had better wake up. People are not going to take another beating like we did in the Bush years.

I highly recommend every member of the GOP do a Google search on "let them eat cake." How did Marie Antoinette fare in the end? Answer me: where do you think things like the Bolshevik revolution come from?

The number one weapon against Socialism is PROSPERITY. Robbing the people is not the key to prosperity. Both of these parties need to learn that.

Dave Lovell of VA 11:32AM April 24, 2012

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

The Best Life

Philip Moeller, contributing editor for U.S. News Money, writes about achieving success and happiness in older age.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement