-
Social Security Tax Breaks Drive New Retirement Strategy
Tweet Share on Facebook November 30, 2012 CommentThe advantages of delaying Social Security benefits as long as possible have been widely supported by financial experts. While benefits can be claimed as early as age 62, they will grow by roughly 8 percent a year until age 70, and also will increase by the amounts of any cost-of-living increases that occur during this period.
Despite these guaranteed increases, roughly 70 percent of beneficiaries not only don't wait to claim until they turn 70, but actually file to begin receiving Social Security before they reach their full retirement age, which is 66 for current retirees. Their reasons are varied. Some people are physically worn out by demanding jobs and are forced to retire early. Others are ill and don't know that they'll live long enough to make it worth their while to defer benefits. Lastly, lots of early claimants are simply strapped for dollars.
In addition, the conventional retirement wisdom has argued that conserving retirement nest eggs should be the dominant goal of retirement planning. If taking Social Security early helps people avoid depleting their 401(k) and IRA balances, the thinking went, that's what seniors should do.
-
7 Planning Steps for Middle-Income Retirements
Tweet Share on Facebook November 27, 2012 CommentAmericans need more retirement planning and investment advice than ever before. We are increasingly responsible for our own retirement investments, courtesy of the move away from traditional pensions to self-directed retirement accounts. We are still trying to recover from the recession. Tax rates could change sharply as Congress wrestles with complex fiscal cliff issues. And according to survey after survey, we don't know enough about investments and personal finance to make good decisions on our own.
There are roughly 110 million middle-class households. According to financial planning research, at most two million, or a bit less than 2 percent, receive financial planning services. The Society of Actuaries (SOA) hardly sounds like the group that would be riding to the rescue of the other 108 million. Yet the SOA has assembled a wealth of research and practical advice aimed at middle-income retirement needs.
In terms of our attitudes about getting professional help, the SOA's research has reached some blunt conclusions:
-
Don't Ignore These Old-Age Needs
Tweet Share on Facebook November 26, 2012 CommentIn our dreams, perhaps, we may imagine that we live to a ripe old age, suffer few illnesses along the way, and end our lives with loved ones at our side after a brief and painless decline. That's not how most lives really end, of course. And with millions of us looking at lifespans that will take us well into our 90s, it's important to recognize that the odds of living "the good life" are much greater for those who have a workable plan for meeting their old-age health and financial needs.
While having enough money is important to achieving comfort in old age, it's not the end-all requirement. What's needed even more than financial resources is a willingness to deal realistically with what old age really means. As aging experts and older people themselves know all too well, even the most successful long life includes emotional, physical, and financial stresses and reversals. Leading the list, in no particular order:
-
21 Questions to Test Your Retirement Smarts
Tweet Share on Facebook November 21, 2012 CommentAs you get ready for what I hope will be a bountiful day of thanks, food, and football on Thanksgiving, try not to laugh if I ask you to consider adding retirement planning to your agenda. Financial planners note that having lots of family members gathered for a pleasant day might serve as a supportive setting for discussing financial matters with children and even grandchildren.
-
Protecting Elders From Financial Abuse
Tweet Share on Facebook November 20, 2012 CommentHelping older Americans make sound money decisions and protecting them from financial predators needs to become a top-tier objective of seniors' groups and government agencies charged with looking out for the welfare of the nation's growing elderly population. This is easier said than done, as was emphasized in a report last week from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on elder financial abuse.
"According to experts, the illegal or improper use of older adults' funds, property, or assets is reaching epidemic proportions in this country," GAO official Kay Brown said in prepared testimony to the Senate Special Committee on Aging. "The money older adults lose in these cases is rarely recovered and this loss can undermine both the health of older adults and their ability to support and care for themselves." Tragically, much of the abuse is committed by relatives and caregivers—the very people older Americans trust to help them in their later years.
In an extensive study of how four states try to protect older citizens from financial abuse, the GAO regularly found that good intentions were outweighed by meager resources and poor coordination of efforts among a maze of state, local, and federal agencies. "Officials told us that older adults need more information about what constitutes elder financial exploitation and how to avoid it, but social services and law enforcement agencies do not always have the resources to promote public awareness in this area," Brown said.
-
Our Message to Washington: Time to Balance the Budget
Tweet Share on Facebook November 19, 2012 CommentIt's way past time to take a giant step back in the federal fiscal debate. What we have here, as Paul Newman was famously told in the movie Cool Hand Luke, is a failure to communicate. In contemporary lingo, what we have is a huge framing problem.
Republicans are fixated on spending cuts and reducing tax rates that are at historic lows. Democrats are tethered to the idea of protecting and even strengthening the social safety net, even as all forecasts show that entitlement spending is bankrupting the nation. Each camp is packed with its respective interest groups. It's nice that President Obama and Congressional leaders had a friendly meeting last Friday and say they finally are willing to compromise.
But what's needed is a different way of looking at the problem. What is the single long-term achievement that would put the United States on the right path and be a huge confidence boost to businesses, consumers, foreign trading partners, and other governments? It's not the marginal tax rate on wealthy Americans. Nor is it the retirement age for Medicare benefits.
-
Why It’s Time for Variable Annuities to Change
Tweet Share on Facebook November 16, 2012 CommentVariable annuities, often called mutual funds with an insurance wrapper, are going through some tough times. The products have been a salesman's dream. They pay high sales commissions and have lots of sexy (in financial terms, that is) bells and whistles that can be pitched to consumers. Because annuity gains are not taxed until withdrawn, they appeal to tax-averse investors, a group that should pretty much include all investors.
-
Fiscal Cliff Shouldn't Change Your Financial Plans
Tweet Share on Facebook November 14, 2012 CommentThe government's impending fiscal cliff is being widely portrayed as a looming financial crisis that could send the nation back into a recession. Coming so soon after the national elections and Hurricane Sandy, perhaps we've just been sensitized to think of this issue as yet another epic event with enormous consequences.
For people trying to save and prepare for retirement, the fiscal cliff certainly may seem like yet another plague sent to ruin their lives. Yet financial experts say this is precisely the time when individual investors should stay the course and not deviate from their financial plan.
It's easy to have a plan when times are good. It's much harder to stick to it when times get tough. If your plans are subject to regular shifts in response to current events, then perhaps they aren't really plans at all.
-
The Big Downside of Raising the Retirement Age
Tweet Share on Facebook November 13, 2012 CommentNow that the post-election entitlements fights are back in the spotlight, raising the Social Security retirement age will return to center stage as one of the common prescriptions for closing the program's long-term funding gap. Increasing or entirely lifting the ceiling on taxable wages—set at $113,700 in 2013—is another frequently mentioned proposal. Further down on the list are measures to change the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security recipients, restrict payments to high-income beneficiaries, and a slew of benefit tweaks that could have a meaningful cumulative impact on program finances.
Unlike the government's other big safety-net programs—Medicare and Medicaid—Social Security is not facing imminent funding problems. With no changes at all, the program projects that it will pay all benefits for more than 20 years and would then be able to continue paying out roughly three-quarters of benefits. Another misconception about Social Security is that it is floating in red ink. Actually, the program had a surplus of about $2.7 trillion in 2012. This cushion will grow further before being sapped by rising benefit payments triggered by millions of retiring baby boomers.
At first glance, raising the retirement age seems like a straightforward change that simply recognizes the demographic realities of aging. People are living longer than ever and are physically able to continue working into their 60s and even 70s. The economy will need more older workers, because retiring boomers are being followed by a much smaller generation of workers. Lastly, people will need to keep working more years for financial reasons—to recover from the recession and to fund retirements that will last a long time.
-
Why America Must Understand These Real Retirement Risks
Tweet Share on Facebook November 12, 2012 CommentMore than half of all American households are at risk of not being able to maintain their current standard of living in retirement, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College's National Retirement Risk Index (NRRI). The percentage of at-risk households rose from 44 percent in 2007 to 53 percent in 2010.
The primary causes for the deterioration are not surprising: falling investment and housing values since the recession, very low interest rates, and the planned transition in the age of eligibility for full Social Security benefits, from 65 to 67. (Raising the retirement age effectively reduces retirement incomes for people who retire at age 65 and claim Social Security.)
This is sobering stuff in a nation where 10,000 baby boomers are turning 65 every day, traditional pensions are disappearing, and 401(k) balances are disappointing. Oh, did I forget to mention the imminent fiscal cliff, which will put even more financial pressure on Social Security, Medicare, and other senior safety-net programs? No wonder virtually every retirement expert has been urging people to set aside more money for their later years.















