Wesley Snipes, Not Dangerous?

May 23, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

A federal judge—who apparently still hasn't seen Demolition Man—on Thursday granted Wesley Snipes's request to remain free on bond until his conviction and sentence are reviewed by a higher court, saying that the former action hero turned tax criminal "does not constitute a danger of any kind."

From the judge's order, via the White Collar Crime Prof Blog:

The Court is persuaded by the history of the case and all of the attendant circumstances that the Defendant poses no substantial risk of flight and does not constitute a danger of any kind if he remains at liberty pending appeal.

Obviously, having denied the Defendant's motions asserting the issues he intends to raise on appeal, the Court is dubious as to the "substantiality" of those issues for purposes of appellate review. Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that the offenses of conviction are misdemeanor offenses, not felonies, and that the time required for the disposition of an appeal may well equal—or nearly equal—the length of the term of commitment imposed.

Snipes was sentenced in late April to three years in prison after being convicted of three misdemeanor tax crimes.

The White Collar Crime Prof Blog (.pdf) has an interesting rundown of how other high-profile figures have made out on their bond appeals:

Denied
Former Atlanta Mayor Bill Campbell—no bail pending appeal on a tax case (see here)

Jamie Olis (Dynegy)

Former Tyco executives Dennis Kozlowski and Mark Swartz (see post here—but they were in the state system)

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby (but sentence was commuted by the president)

Granted
Former Adelphia Communications executives John and Timothy Rigas (but now in prison—see here)

Bernie Ebbers (Worldcom) (now in prison—see here)

Martha Stewart (but she elected to go into the prison system sooner and finished her sentence)

Gov. George Ryan (but denied on cert. petition)

Tags:
courts,
prison sentences,
income tax,
taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If it is proved that Snipes' tax company did the screw up then, I think he should be allowed to go free by paying the amount he owes to the federal govt. And that he shouldn't be harassed anymore. And yes, just because he is a martial artist doesn't make him violent or dangerous.

Shubhatosh 4:30AM June 21, 2008

I dont think that Snipes should be convicted. The Resin i say that is he has people that dose his tax's and takes care of his finance. He is unable to do that with his work and the amount of money involved. If a Company is retained to manage a persons money they should be held responsable for problems with that money including and not limited to his Tax's If Mr. Snipes is being heald responsable then he should not have other doing his taxes. Some how it dosent seem right. It seems that is why we higher people do do it for us beacuse we cant but at the same time people have to answer for it. He is an actor not an accountant. Blind Justice is holding true.

David of FL 9:53AM May 27, 2008

It is important to remember that this man has been convicted of a non-violent crime. The issue here is not what could he do, but more over, what is he likely to do?

A one armed woman, blind in one eye, confined to a wheel chair and holding a firearm with murderous intent in her heart is a greater threat to the public than is a person trained in the marital arts, especially if the martial artists has no history of aggressively violent behavior nor mental illness.

Had he been convicted of a violent crime or had a history of violent behavior, the situation would, of course, be entirely different. At that point, it could easily be argued that it would be in the people's best interest for him to remain incarcerated until his appeals have been resolved.

In these times when so often the common man does not seem to receive the same justice as that the celebrity or public figure, it is all to easy for us protest and demand in outrage that our public servants respond. We tend to forget that when they do, it is usually to the extreme.

Let us remember that the application of justice should not be based on celebrity status. Likewise, it should neither be overly lenient, nor too harsh. This man is still entitled to fair and equal treatment under the law.

James Carey of GA 10:55AM May 25, 2008

The Collar

Luke Mullins is an associate editor at U.S. News, covering banking, real estate, and white-collar crime. He came to the magazine from the American Banker, a financial services daily newspaper, after a stint in the Peace Corps in West Africa and 18 months coaching baseball in the Dominican Republic. Mullins earned a master's degree in journalism from Syracuse University in 2005 and now lives in Washington, D.C., where he grew up. He has written about white-collar criminals for the American magazine, and his work was included in 20 Something Essays by 20 Something Writers: The Best New Voices of 2006, a Random House anthology that appeared on the Boston Globe's bestseller list.

advertisement

advertisement