Housing Bill Called Weak

April 4, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

While the removal of a bankruptcy provision was essential to the deal reached on the Senate's $15 billion housing bill, it has created problems on another front. After stripping the provision that would have let judges alter the terms of certain loans, Democrats now face criticism from consumer groups:

"The measure could have saved more than half a million borrowers from foreclosure through 2009, according to its supporters, by allowing judges to lower the interest rates of mortgages, extend the life of the loans, or forgive part of the debts," the Washington Post reports. "Of all the legislative proposals aimed at helping homeowners, consumer advocates said this one offered the most relief."

From today's Washington Post:

Without the provision, "there's no guarantee of any help whatsoever for many of the clients I work with," said Nancy Ryan, a bankruptcy lawyer in Fairfax.

Alys Cohen, a staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, said the package will do little to stem foreclosures. "What we've got right now is basically voluntary measures and incentives.... That's it."

Full article here.

Tags:
housing,
legislation

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It would be absurd to have judges arbitrarily lower the terms/rates/principal amount on mortgages in trouble. Better to have Clinton/Obama/McCain give up

some of the $$ they collected to bombard us with absurd ads, to assist homeowners in trouble. Al Gore should contribute the highest amount to help all of us conquer "global warming". These are highly logical/valid partial solutions to the problem. Add that to a fund that will be contributed by Banks/Mortgage bankers to atone for their greed and we are almost there. These individuals have a need to

assist the country/economy. Lets make this the campaign of 2008-2009.

Rick Hopkins of FL 12:40PM April 08, 2008

The problem with the provision is that it could have potentially set a precedent in contract law. Judges shouldn't have the ability to renegotiate mortgage terms. I think judges SHOULD have the ability to recommend that mortgage lenders contact depressed individuals to come up with solutions to help them. That's pretty vague, but less damaging than allowing judges to renegotiate contract terms.

Chris of AZ 6:46PM April 04, 2008

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement