Mark Zandi on the Housing Bottom

Reader Comments

Back to blog

With all due respect to Mark Zandi, his prognosis is completely disingenuous. First, the high number of nationwide foreclosures means NAR stats are subject to bank manipulation. A simple comparison of MLS listings and Realtytrac data (excluding pre-foreclosures/auction properties) shows that all foreclosures are not being listed – not by a long shot. This means prices are being artificially supported and that NAR supply figures are completely skewed. (See this CNBC interview with Realtytrac CEO for more about this problem.)

Secondly, Zandi relies on the assumption that the GSE’s will have an audience beyond the Federal Reserve after this summer – what a joke. This January alone, the Fed blew through 15% (+/-) of a $500 billion fund allocated to sop up excess Agency MBS. Why? Because their natural audience of buyers (China/Japan) are busy fighting their own economic battles and rethinking their exposure. I think it would be amazing to see the GSE’s survive this year without becoming government utility. Even then, the weight on our treasuries would prove disastrous.

The fact is, until all foreclosures get put on the market and prices naturally fall further (well beyond 10% from today levels), we’ll sputter along like Japan did in the 1990’s or worse. The benefit of a complete and total crash in prices is that if the FHA survives it, they’ll be positioned to finance more purchase on smaller loan amounts. Until then, each purchase at today’s still-bloated prices eats away at the finite funds of tomorrow. Prices need to roll back to 1999 levels at least to meet the supply of credit.

Market Observer of CA 7:56PM February 06, 2009

can you tell me why 8%.

chris of AZ 12:45AM September 19, 2008

Interest rates were too low too long. Mortgages should be 8% and should have been for the past decade. We would have smaller homes that people could actually buy, even at higher interest. We would not have this nutty notion that everyone needs a granite countertop. Formica is and always was fine.

$200,000 for a starter home in podunk junction? $400,000 in a hot metro? Because 5.5% money is available while inflation is more than that? It is and has been nuts too long.

of 5:16PM September 16, 2008

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement