Senate Passes the Bailout Bill

October 2, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

The bailout bill safely passed the Senate on Wednesday by a vote of 74 to 25. The legislation now moves to the House, where it went down in a stunning defeat earlier this week.

Although the bailout legislation started out at just three pages, it's now more than 400. That's thanks to a slew of additions—such as raising the FDIC's deposit insurance cap and billions in tax breaks—designed to secure broader support.

But the core component of the legislation remains unchanged: $700 billion to buy up souring securities in an effort to unclog the credit markets.

If you've got a couple hours, here's the full bill.

For everyone else, here's the summary:

SUMMARY OF THE "EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008"

I. Stabilizing the Economy

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) provides up to $700 billion to the Secretary of the Treasury to buy mortgages and other assets that are clogging the balance sheets of financial institutions and making it difficult for working families, small businesses, and other companies to access credit, which is vital to a strong and stable economy. EESA also establishes a program that would allow companies to insure their troubled assets.

II. Homeownership Preservation

EESA requires the Treasury to modify troubled loans—many the result of predatory lending practices—wherever possible to help American families keep their homes. It also directs other federal agencies to modify loans that they own or control. Finally, it improves the HOPE for Homeowners program by expanding eligibility and increasing the tools available to the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help more families keep their homes.

III. Taxpayer Protection

Taxpayers should not be expected to pay for Wall Street's mistakes. The legislation requires companies that sell some of their bad assets to the government to provide warrants so that taxpayers will benefit from any future growth these companies may experience as a result of participation in this program. The legislation also requires the President to submit legislation that would cover any losses to taxpayers resulting from this program from financial institutions.

IV. No Windfalls for Executives

Executives who made bad decisions should not be allowed to dump their bad assets on the government, and then walk away with millions of dollars in bonuses. In order to participate in this program, companies will lose certain tax benefits and, in some cases, must limit executive pay. In addition, the bill limits "golden parachutes" and requires that unearned bonuses be returned.

V. Strong Oversight

Rather than giving the Treasury all the funds at once, the legislation gives the Treasury $250 billion immediately, then requires the President to certify that additional funds are needed ($100 billion, then $350 billion subject to Congressional disapproval). The Treasury must report on the use of the funds and the progress in addressing the crisis. EESA also establishes an Oversight Board so that the Treasury cannot act in an arbitrary manner. It also establishes a special inspector general to protect against waste, fraud and abuse.

Tags:
Wall Street,
FDIC,
government intervention,
Congress,
Senate

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i need to know more about the mortage modification program what need to be done to start it.

Douglas Lee of VA 7:51AM June 23, 2009

I don't care if Bush and Congress want to call it Recovery plan to most taxpayers it is still a "Wall Street Bailout." As I perused the bill I found it very vague, ambiguous and clearly leaves the biggest of loopholes. Just on executive compensation, vague. All it says is to "limit" the compensation and limit golden parachute. I expected to see strong wording, saying a cap of $50,000 on compensation and NO golden parachutes for any executive. These "robber barons" have taken more than enough money out of these companies while driving them into the ground. When taxpayers read Richard Fudd, Lehman Bros. ruined his company to the tune of $500M while leading the company into disaster and then still walk away with a $22M bonus for destroying it! And, that's money that we know of.

Allan Fishman, WaMu worked only two weeks and walked out of a failing company with $7.5M bonus and $6M in severance pay all that money for working two weeks. Mr. Joe Sixpack walks out with no job, no stock, no retirement fund and no severance pay.

Congress has the nerve to ask Why? don't we get behind the bailout of Wall Street?? I have emailed and called my representatives telling them NO to this bailout. Let the "robber barons" help themselves.

Ann of IA 3:02PM October 02, 2008

So let's get this straight; An homeowner uses their house as a credit card; spending all of the equity they had. The banks know that the market will adjust as it does every 7 to 10 years, and now the home owners can't make the minimum monthly payment and the banks cry "foul?" Well if you can't afford it, you lose it! As for Wall Street needing a bail out; if they didn't know the market was going to adjust down they should be fired for not knowing their job. If they knew it was going to adjust but made the loans anyways they should be prosecuted.

Tio Guerro of CA 2:21PM October 02, 2008

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement