Alan Greenspan Blames Securitization for Crisis

October 23, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

With financial crisis finger-pointing season in full swing, former Fed chief Alan Greenspan appeared on Capitol Hill Thursday to offer his take on the root cause.

Greenspan—who himself has faced stiff criticism for his role in creating the current crisis—argued instead that the explosion of home mortgage securitization sits at the problem's core.

From Greenspan's prepared testimony:

What went wrong with global economic policies that had worked so effectively for nearly four decades? The breakdown has been most apparent in the securitization of home mortgages. The evidence strongly suggests that without the excess demand from securitizers, subprime mortgage originations (undeniably the original source of crisis) would have been far smaller and defaults accordingly far fewer. But subprime mortgages pooled and sold as securities became subject to explosive demand from investors around the world. These mortgage backed securities being "subprime" were originally offered at what appeared to be exceptionally high risk-adjusted market interest rates. But with U.S. home prices still rising, delinquency and foreclosure rates were deceptively modest. Losses were minimal. To the most sophisticated investors in the world, they were wrongly viewed as a "steal."

The consequent surge in global demand for U.S. subprime securities by banks, hedge, and pension funds supported by unrealistically positive rating designations by credit agencies was, in my judgment, the core of the problem. Demand became so aggressive that too many securitizers and lenders believed they were able to create and sell mortgage backed securities so quickly that they never put their shareholders' capital at risk and hence did not have the incentive to evaluate the credit quality of what they were selling. Pressures on lenders to supply more "paper" collapsed subprime underwriting standards from 2005 forward. Uncritical acceptance of credit ratings by purchasers of these toxic assets has led to huge losses.

Tags:
Alan Greenspan,
Wall Street,
mortgages,
Congress,
Federal Reserve

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The most damaging definition of securitization arises when a bank or Fannie Mae is able to raise funds by issuing a debenture ( for example Mortgage Backed Securities) which is sold on the market, but is dishonoured at the redemption date thus becoming a toxic asset in the balance sheet of the world's banks.

Peter L. Griffiths 12:27PM October 14, 2011

Were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the main culprits responsible for selling dud securities on the market?

Peter L. Griffiths 12:51PM September 27, 2011

The whole point of securitization was to enable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to sell on to the market the dud mortgages they had acquired from guaranteeing subprime mortgages. In effecting these sales Fannie and Freddie gave the misleading impression that these securitized mortgages would be redeemed.

Peter L. Griffiths 1:47PM September 06, 2011

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement