Will JPMorgan Lend Its Bailout Cash? Perhaps Not

October 27, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

The question everyone is asking about Treasury's plan to put $250 billion into U.S. financial institutions is this: Are these newly capitalized banks going to lend out this cash to the companies that badly need it—or just hoard it to protect themselves?

In a fascinating piece Friday, New York Times columnist Joe Nocera says that although Hank Paulson has been urging banks to turn these new funds into fresh loans, banks appear likely to sit on the cash. "The dirty little secret of the banking industry is that it has no intention of using the money to make new loans," Nocera writes.

The column was based on a JPMorgan Chase employee-only conference call that took place days after the bank agreed to a $25 billion injection from the feds. Nocera listened to a recording of the call but declined to identify the bank executive who was taking the questions.

At one point, the executive was asked: "Chase recently received $25 billion in federal funding. What effect will that have on the business side, and will it change our strategic lending policy?"

His response:

"Twenty-five billion dollars is obviously going to help the folks who are struggling more than Chase," he began. "What we do think it will help us do is perhaps be a little bit more active on the acquisition side or opportunistic side for some banks who are still struggling. And I would not assume that we are done on the acquisition side just because of the Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns mergers. I think there are going to be some great opportunities for us to grow in this environment, and I think we have an opportunity to use that $25 billion in that way and obviously depending on whether recession turns into depression or what happens in the future, you know, we have that as a backstop."

Read that answer as many times as you want—you are not going to find a single word in there about making loans to help the American economy. On the contrary: at another point in the conference call, the same executive (who I'm not naming because he didn't know I would be listening in) explained that "loan dollars are down significantly." He added, "We would think that loan volume will continue to go down as we continue to tighten credit to fully reflect the high cost of pricing on the loan side." In other words JPMorgan has no intention of turning on the lending spigot.

Should this turn out to be the case—that banks hoard their billions of dollars in bailout capital—expect a fresh round of tantrums on Capitol Hill. Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said "there will be hell to pay" if it turns out banks are hoarding the capital, Nocera reports.

Tags:
JPMorgan Chase,
loans,
Wall Street,
government intervention,
banking

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

JP Morgan is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes. Yes, you read that correctly. When the number of Americans on food stamps goes up, JP Morgan makes more money. JP Morgan executive Christopher Paton admits that this is "a very important business to JP Morgan" and that it is doing very well. Considering the fact that the number of Americans on food stamps has exploded from 26 million in 2007 to 43 million today, one can only imagine how much JP Morgan's profits in this area have soared. Does this give JP Morgan an incentive to keep the number of Americans enrolled in the food stamp program as high as possible?...

Mark of WY 12:25PM June 02, 2011

I am sad to say that unless you have an account/s with Chase you really have no room to talk. I have a home loan with Chase (for 7 years) never over 30days late until Hurr.Katrina when the Feds told mortgage lenders to give 90 extensions to Gulf Coast residents impated- Chase did that and at the end of the 90 days sent us a registered letter and a video (which we had to travel to view it- since we had nothing) threatening their proceedure of "FORCLOSURE" if the 90 days was not PAID IN FULL withing 30 days. After pooling any money from family from all over, our children in the military took out loans to save our home- yeah Chase really helped out! Then when Chase recently purchased WaMu I watched my interest rate go from 26.99 to 30.99% without notice- got a welcome letter and WaMu bill (have not gotten a bill from Chase as of yet) but since I pay mine on line I found out there- no purchases in over 18 months- never late and pay double what's owed in advance! Yeah- they are really helping! Want to buy some beachfront property in OK? I hope they go BROKE! I can't BELIEVE our tax money is helping them out- WHO ARE THEY HELPING??!!!!

K. Karl of MS 10:29AM March 19, 2009

JP Morgan's acquisition of WAMU should not only come with the positive, but include the negative as well. The slate should be wiped clean of all debts since they used tax dollars paid by the US citizens to purchase WAMU. JP Morgan has no intention of paying back this loans, it just doesn't have the capital due to the negative purchases. This is pure greed. For the taxpayers that have already falter use you debit card to spend over the limit up to $1000 then declare bankruptcy.

GAredneck of GA 10:34AM March 09, 2009

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement