Rep. John Mica on Fannie/Freddie Special Prosecutor

October 29, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Last week a handful of Republican lawmakers sent a letter to the U.S. attorney general asking him to appoint a special counsel to investigate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's role in triggering the current financial crisis.

From the letter:

At the center of the troubles in the mortgage-related markets may lie a cluster of maladies that never should have taken hold—fraud and mismanagement at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, missed opportunities to rein in these Government Sponsored Enterprises, and overzealous lending under the auspices of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).

Read the full letter here.

GOP members have been calling the mortgage finance giants patient zero of the crisis, as lawmakers on Capitol Hill look to score points before the election. For their part, Democrats are fingering deregulation and lax oversight—particularly on the part of the Federal Reserve—as the root cause of the turmoil.

I recently caught up with Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), one of the lawmakers who made the request, to chat about the issue:

Why should a special prosecutor be appointed to investigate Fannie and Freddie?

"There are several FBI investigations ongoing that we know about, but this transcends traditional territory and they are a little bit squeamish to get into the government side of it. One of the reasons I called for the special prosecutor—or independent counsel—is that there are some political figures involved and they need to be held accountable. [A special prosecutor] can do agency, they can do private sector, and then they can come after people on the Hill. But right now on the Hill, it's very sensitive—it's a buddy-buddy thing—and a lot of them had culpability."

Which lawmakers are you referring to?

"The Wall Street Journal...showed that the biggest recipient of 20 years of political contributions was not Chris Dodd—he was actually in second place—it was actually Barack Obama, who in less than four years got the most money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Tags:
John Mica,
Wall Street,
Freddie Mac,
Fannie Mae

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I forgot to add that the amendment above pertained to H.R. 4635, and that the No vote by John Mica clearly indicates culpability on his part as well.

The "buddy-buddy thing" John Mica mentions also extends to himself, and his actions now seem quite hypocritical given his own rejection of additional funding for increased oversight back in 2000.

Sayjereese of FL 7:56PM October 29, 2008

I believe that the critical Congressional vote that ultimately led to the GSE’s requiring a government bailout was the defeat of H.A. 845.

H.A. 845 called for an increase funding for the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight by $4.7 million.

John Mica voted NO on this additional oversight which was sought in June of 2000.

Though I applaud the investigation into the activities of and role that the GSE’s played in the problems that led to the financial crisis but it is hard to imagine that the GSE’s could possibly be the lynch pin of a crisis of such magnitude. The GSE’s are just one variable, perhaps a disproportionately large variable, in an equation that has quite a number of variables. The timing of the Republicans’ call for an investigation, coinciding, as it does with election season, appears, at best, as politics as usual and, at worst, disingenuous.

Sayjereese of FL 7:42PM October 29, 2008

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement