Nouriel Roubini to Congress: Pass Stimulus ASAP

October 30, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

New York University Prof. Nouriel Roubini—Dr. Doom himself—was slated to testify at a congressional hearing Thursday about the economic outlook and the need for a second stimulus package.

Here's what he told lawmakers in his written testimony:

The U.S. is currently in a severe recession that will be deeper, longer and more protracted than previous U.S. recessions. The last two economic recessions—in 1990-91 and 2001—lasted each 8 months and the cumulative fall in GDP from peak through the through was only 1.3% in the 1990-91 contraction and 0.4% in the 2001 contraction. In a typical U.S. recession in the post-WWII period GDP falls by an average of 2% and the recession lasts 10 months. The current economic contraction—that my analysis dates as having started in the first quarter of 2008 will last through the fourth quarter of 2009 with a cumulative fall in GDP of the order of about 4% that is even larger than the worst post-WWII recession (the one in 1957-68 when the GDP fall was 3.7%).

Since most components of private aggregate demand are sharply falling right now (private consumption, residential investment, non-residential investment in structures, capex spending by the corporate sector on software and machinery) a major additional fiscal stimulus is necessary to reduces the depth and length of the current economic contraction. And since direct tax incentives have not been effective in boosting consumption and capex spending (as worried households and firm are retrenching their spending) the new round of fiscal stimulus will have to take the form of direct government spending on goods and services (preferably productive investment in infrastructures) and provision to income to those agents in the economy more likely to spend it (block grants to state and local governments, increased unemployment benefits to unemployed workers, etc.).

Given the size of the expected contraction in private aggregate demand (likely to be about $450 billion in 2009 relative to 2008) a fiscal stimulus of the order of $300 billion minimum (and possibly as large as $400 billion) will be necessary to partially compensate for the sharp fall in private aggregate demand.

This fiscal stimulus should be voted on and spent as soon as possible as delay will make the economic contraction even more severe. A stimulus package legislated only February or March of next year when the new Congress comes back will be too late as the contraction of private aggregate demand will be extremely sharp in the next few months. Such policy action should be legislated right away—in a "lame duck" session right after the election—to ensure that the actual spending is undertaken rapidly in the next few months.

Tags:
economics,
Congress,
GDP,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I surf the net and have read and watched literally hundreds of economists parlay their opinions. I, like your first reader, hate the excrement you heap upon this man. You only have to study the man closely; his voice, his directness, his frankness, his body posture, his gestures and mannerisms. His is a brillant mind and needs to be among the leaders for change. Obama, campaigning and running the country are two different things....you need Roubini NOW. He almost feels like a guiding star to me. romans8vii@att.net

Gail Gross of 5:28PM November 05, 2008

Guys like Roubini advocate a second stimulus, which will do nothing other than provide a short-lived prop in GDP (due to government spending, the G component of the equation Y=C+I+G+NE). It will not induce any long-term benefit to the country or its citizens. The first stimulus had very little, if any, effect and only resulted in an increased budget deficit.

The economy is in dire shape due to the unstable underlying support of the financial system, which needs amendment. I have seen numerous statistical analyses (multivariate time-serie regression), which suggest that increased government spending has a negative effect on the economy (stock market declines, higher income inequality). These government expenditures have to be financed somehow and that surely means higher taxes, which is a double whammy. Not only will Americans experience higher tax rates and be able to save less for retirement, but the stock market will underperform as a result, so the reduced money that is available for investment will not grow as much.

That doesn't sound very like very smart policy to me. We have seen recessions throughout history and will see more in the future, after we come out of this one! Let's not get all crazy and spend like there is no tomorrow. Fiscal conservatism, despite its bad rap, is a sensible long-term strategy.

Economics 101 of VA 2:53PM November 05, 2008

Re:

"I don't know why you refer to Dr. Roubini as Dr. Doom. It sounds like sarcasm."

After 10 years of right-wing radio and right-wing politics, Americans are now so dummied-down, they've become super-stupid, and in denial of reality. Americans can't think straight anymore, and they can't stand THE TRUTH, so smart people like Dr. Roubini are ridiculed.

Hopefully, this pathetic phenomena will end after November 4th.

Bina of IN 10:29AM November 02, 2008

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement