Larry Summers Talks Bailout on Meet the Press

January 26, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Here's Larry Summers ducking the question about whether more bailout cash--that's on top of the $700 billion already dedicated--will be needed to stabilize the financial system. His evasive answer suggests that additional funds may in fact be required.

From Meet the Press:

MR. GREGORY: We have a few minutes left. I want to talk about the banking crisis in this country. First question, $700 billion has been dedicated to shore up the country's failing banks. Will more money be needed down the road?

DR. SUMMERS: We're gratified that Congress has given the president the authorization he needs to unlock that $700 billion that the Bush administration had worked with Congress to create. The president's financial recovery program's going to be very different than what we've seen so far. It's going to emphasize transparency, it's going to emphasize accountability; perhaps most importantly, the focus isn't going to be on the needs of financial institutions. Of course we need to stabilize financial institutions. Without a stable financial system, the economy can't work. But the priority has to be getting credit flowing again so that people can buy cars, so that people can get mortgages...

MR. GREGORY: Right.

DR. SUMMERS: ...so that the economy will operate. Secretary-designate Geithner we expect will be sworn into office very soon, and when he is, soon after he will be laying out the plans and principles behind our approach. We believe we can make important progress...

MR. GREGORY: All right, but I want, I want to get to this point. Do you think we'll need more? You know the state of the finances of these banks. Will more money be needed? Do taxpayers have to expect that we're not done paying yet?

DR. SUMMERS: We can make important progress and get started with the support that has been provided. What ultimately will be necessary is something that will play out over time. The president has made clear that our administration is going to be leaning forward, that we're going to be proactive and that he is prepared to do what is necessary, but only to do what is necessary in the context of responsibility...

MR. GREGORY: So it's possible.

DR. SUMMERS: ...in the context of trust...

MR. GREGORY: Right.

DR. SUMMERS: ...things we've seen too little of in recent years.

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

+1

soundtracks of AL 5:49AM July 17, 2009

Why not make all current and future home loans recourse loans, i.e. you can not declare bankruptcy and give them back to the bank? This is personal responsibility; make individuals responsible for their own home loans. This is what they do in Canada and not one bank is in trouble in Canada. All home loans are recourse loans in Canada. If an individual can not pay their home loan it is their own responsibility, not the banks problem. In the US, student loans are recourse loans you can not get rid of them by declaring bankruptcy; let's make home loans the same way. Every time president Bush got on TV and talked about the bailout, the stock market dropped 200 - 300 pts. Every time president Obama gets on TV and talks about the stimulus package, the stock market drops 200-300 pts. If Obama would get on TV and tell everyone that no more primary resident home loans could be returned to the banks, I predict the stock market would go up quickly. Allow individuals to renegotiate the terms of their loans, but not drop the loans. This wouldn't cost the tax payers even one penny!

Karen of MO 10:00AM March 08, 2009

President Obama and Mr. Summers need to tell the American people the exact details and reasons of this package to which people are objecting. We, the people, have heard that a portion of the package is to be spent on landscaping the White House grounds. Is this true?? This, indeed, does not seem Stimulus-worthy. Also heard, is the purchase of government vehicles!? Ludicrous. Wa-a-y too much money was spent on the Inaugural Balls!! I'm a staunch Obama supporter, but he should have curtailed some of the spending on them as well as the luncheon!! THAT would have been a good start.

(demographics: Caucasion, female, 56, upper middle class)

Leslie G of CA 3:28PM January 26, 2009

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement