Rachel Maddow: MSNBC's Smart Hire

September 24, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (92)

The ratings for MSNBC's newest news show host are wildly impressive. Last week, her second on the air, Rachel Maddow pulled ahead of Larry King and even bested Keith Olbermann's Countdown a couple of nights. Maddow, an Air America radio host and MSNBC contributor, was given her own show after the politics-heavy channel dropped Dan Abrams's legal show Verdict.

Here are a few things Maddow's doing that are good examples for anyone starting a new job:

Avoiding office gossip. She told the San Francisco Chronicle that she doesn't follow "media issues," when asked about the channel's move to cut Olbermann and Chris Matthews from straight election coverage.

Not giving up her private life. She also told the Chronicle that she does not own a television. It sounds crazy, but she explains: "If there is a TV on in the room, I can't have a conversation with you. I won't eat, I won't sleep. I'll just meld with my couch."

Breaking with tradition. She's hosting only one guest at a time. Last night, we heard one-on-one interviews with Newsweek's Michael Isikoff, Los Angeles Times columnist Rosa Brooks, and others. That's the point—we heard them.

Disagreeing openly but staying civil. Conservative Pat Buchanan has a regular segment on her show called "It's Pat." He and Maddow argue the issues, but they don't insult each other.

Tags:
media,
careers,
NBC

Reader Comments Read all comments (92)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Rachel Maddow has opened up the world of politics for me due to the fact that she does such great research and finding the core stories that are commonly under reported, or she finds the story behind the story. I like the fact that she is willing to confront and comment upon both sides of the political world without being someones mouth piece but her own.

Carole Blum of CA 11:52PM January 11, 2013

I saw your show tonight and I saw the segment where you were speaking on the gun rights. First off, have you read the constitution and read the words but not tried to interpret it? It states our rights to bear arms is for KEEPING the government from overthrowing it's people once again. Just as the British did to the Colonist. By allowing the people the right to bear arms for that reason it also allows us the right to bear arms for the purpose to ensure our safety from others as well.

Secondly, have you served in the military? I have. Who has the right to take away what I have fought for? Have you read the 28th ammendment? Congress shall make no laws concerning the people that they themselves shall not also be held to. Why then would Congress be allowed to keep their weapons and why then is Congress exempt from the same Medical Insurance laws as the people? Why not report un biased instead of it being obvious by your words and facial expressions showing where you stand for a chance?

JC of TX 2:40AM April 21, 2010

Rachel:

I have often wondered why a large portion of the US population believes that the US Government is incompetent to manage something rather straight forward such as universal health care - when at the same time the majority of the population believes that the Government is perfectly capable of waging wars all over the globe. It seems to me that waging wars might be a bit more complicated than providing health care.

Can you explain that apparent contradiction?

Hans Svendsen 8:09PM September 11, 2009

The Inside Job

You're taking a break from your job-hunting and job-hopping ways and have decided to stay put in your current position. Liz Wolgemuth’s careers blog will show you how to make the very best of your job, each day.

advertisement

advertisement