Lee Iacocca Understood Bailouts

February 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

The web is rife with commentary about President Obama's $500,000 cap on pay for top executives of companies getting the biggest chunks of TARP money.

Perhaps the most enlightening thoughts come from Nell Minow, an expert on corporate governance. While today's government bailouts certainly seem unprecedented, Minow digs up the $1.5 billion Chrysler bailout of 1979 to great effect.

From CNN.com:

Lee Iacocca established instant confidence and credibility by taking $1 a year and escalated stock options. He showed that he was willing to bet on himself and the company, and that, more than any other statement he could make, made everyone -- employees, investors, government and taxpayers -- willing to bet on him, too.

First, the government got paid back and got a good return (though it should have been higher) and then the shareholders and then Iacocca, who made as much as any titan could ask for.

It would seem that today's Wall Street automatic-bonus culture--driven, it seems, by the almighty goal of "talent retention"--has abandoned something a bit more important--public opinion.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It seems that the collective memory of the public, elected officials, writers, businessmen et al, must be subject to dementia. Lee Iacocca and Chrysler borrowed a ton of money from the gov't in 1979 (?) and paid it back. The gov't actually MADE MILLIONS of dollars on that deal. Why anyone would offer up the 'CONRAIL' project for automakers when the previous Chrysler bailout is available for EXACT comparison is beyond me !

Ken Rubino of NY 7:29AM March 16, 2009

There is no real reason for any bank president to be making more than $500,000.

We're yelling about it now because taxpayer money is involved. But depositors' money and shareholders' money is ALWAYS involved.

Time to scale back the CEO expectations, and scale them back just as far as workers are told to diminish theirs. The way to do this is high marginal income tax rates of old. Try 60% on incomes over a million.

That will fix your excesses and never should have been abandoned in the first place.

But the "talent" (talent at shortchanging investors and workers) will move elsewhere, they cry. YES, I say, that's the point.

Muser of NM 10:12AM February 05, 2009

The Inside Job

You're taking a break from your job-hunting and job-hopping ways and have decided to stay put in your current position. Liz Wolgemuth’s careers blog will show you how to make the very best of your job, each day.

advertisement

advertisement