More Jobs Created in House Stimulus Bill, Say Economists

February 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

In an effort to be cut some massivneess from the massive stimulus bill, the more fiscally conservative Senate trimmed some programs--and some jobs, according to some economists. From Bloomberg:

While providing more generous tax breaks than the House version, the Senate agreement pared $40 billion targeted at helping state and city governments avoid layoffs, $19.5 billion for school construction, $7 billion for health care and about $1 billion for early education programs.

Excising or reducing funds to those programs significantly blunts the stimulative effects of the Senate package, economists say.

Mark Zandi of Moody's Economy.com (oft-quoted conservative economist in favor of the stimulus) and Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, both say the trimmer Senate bill is the less effective of the two.

Martin Feldstein, however, says both bills miss the mark in getting enough bang for the buck.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The stimulus bill contains money for rebuilding transportation infrastructure that Republicans have let crumble. Caterpillar builds machines and vehicles useful to that rebuilding part of the stimulus bill. So, unfortunately, the answer is yes. I know it's disappointing to watch government pitch in to rebuild the US. I'm guessing you are preferential to watching the country crumble say after it is hit by a hurricane. The bill is not the answer to every problem created by borrow and spend politicians. It is going to take a while to clean up the total mess created by Reagan/supply-side/trickle down economics.

Mark of MN 3:37PM February 13, 2009

Now, we are going to have nationalized health care for all and those same people will all be homeless. I thought this was about stimulating our economy. It seems it's all about what's in it for me (our elected officials). I am a real estate agent in Illinois but again it's not about me. The housing package is about people hoping to keep there homes from foreclosure since their value is less than they owe. I believe this plan would have helped get our country moving ahead. Let's not forget these hoodlums when election time comes again. That is if there's a USA then.

Ears for real estate of IL 8:39PM February 11, 2009

This is a spending bill is all about hope, dreams, and payback for the far left.

The jobs that it does create will be government jobs (Bigger Government for years to come) the long term cost of this spending bill will limit our ability to compete in the world economy, thus less jobs. Why you ask, because this bill is going to tie up the available funds for lending for years. Who would you rather lend to the US Government or to Catapiller? Banks are all about level of returns with the lowest amount of risk.

For all you that don't remember the Carter years I suggest you do a little research on your own and stop being sheep.

Larry of CA 6:22PM February 10, 2009

The Inside Job

You're taking a break from your job-hunting and job-hopping ways and have decided to stay put in your current position. Liz Wolgemuth’s careers blog will show you how to make the very best of your job, each day.

advertisement

advertisement