5 Characteristics of a Good 401(k) Plan

May 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

The 401(k) has become the main retirement savings plan for many Americans. As such, it is important to both employees and the sponsoring organization that they have access to a solid plan that offers participants the opportunity to amass the money they need for a comfortable retirement. With that in mind, here are five characteristics of a good 401(k) plan:

An active and engaged investment committee. In small- to mid-sized plans, an investment committee might consist of an owner and several members of senior management. In a larger plan the committee might be a bit larger. Whatever its size, this committee should take its role seriously, and have the final say on all aspects of the plan, including the investment menu, plan design issues, and all outside vendors. The committee should hire outside experts, such as consultants and financial advisors, as needed.

[See Are You 401(k) Savings Enough for Retirement?]

An investment process. This is the major fiduciary activity of the sponsoring organization, usually done by the investment committee. A plan that simply accepts the investment menu offered by the plan provider is hardly acting in the best interests of the plan participants. The fund company or insurance company providing the plan is not a fiduciary; it is often in their best interest to load a plan with their own proprietary funds. A well-run plan starts with a written investment policy statement (IPS) that acts as the foundation for managing the plan going forward. The best plans have an ongoing process to review expenses, the investments offered, and the outside vendors being used.

A menu of well-diversified investment options. A provider can offer the greatest website and all of the bells and whistles available, but at the end of the day what really matters is that the participants have a diversified menu of solid investment choices, selected and monitored in accordance with the IPS. Balanced options, lifestyle, or target date funds that allow the participants to delegate the allocation of their assets can also be included. However, these options should be scrutinized, monitored, and reviewed in the same manner as the other plan investment options. The preferences of the committee (on behalf of the plan participants), the company's census demographics, and other factors, should govern the composition of the plan's investment menu.

[For more investing and money advice, visit U.S. News Money, or find us on Facebook or Twitter.]

Low expenses. The plan sponsor should ensure that the expenses incurred by the plan, especially those that are paid by the participants from their accounts, are reasonable. This includes expenses associated with record keeping, administration, custody, and, of course, investments. The sponsor should know what is being charged for all services and how these total expenses compare with plans of a similar size. If there is revenue sharing involved, the plan sponsor should receive a full account at least annually of all revenue sharing paid to the plan provider, and how that revenue sharing was spent. This is, after all, the participant's money; accounting for these dollars is a fiduciary obligation of the plan sponsor.

Easily accessible investment advice. Participants are hungry for help in investing their retirement plan assets. Education is great thing, but access to direct advice from an unbiased source is critical. A number of plans, large and small, offer participants advice—let's hope this trend continues.

[See 5 Unconventional Asset Classes That Could Change Your Portfolio.]

It is in the best interest of organizations offering retirement plans to ensure that their plan offers a solid benefit to their employees. Not only is there a fiduciary obligation on their part, but a solid retirement plan can be an excellent way to attract and retain the best employees.

Plan participants: if your company's plan is lousy, let your employer know. Voice your concerns in a constructive manner.

Roger Wohlner , CFP®, is a fee-only financial adviser at Asset Strategy Consultants, based in Arlington Heights, Ill., where he provides advice to individual clients, retirement plan sponsors, foundations, and endowments. He recently cofounded Retirement Fiduciary Advisors to provide direct investment and retirement planning advice to 401(k) plan participants. Follow Roger on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Tags:
401(k),
investing,
mutual funds,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Exactly! Have them call me, I'll help them!

"It is in the best interest of organizations offering retirement plans to ensure that their plan offers a solid benefit to their employees. Not only is there a fiduciary obligation on their part, but a solid retirement plan can be an excellent way to attract and retain the best employees.

Plan participants: if your company's plan is lousy, let your employer know. Voice your concerns in a constructive manner."

Diane Larson of WI 5:42PM October 31, 2011

David Danziger seems not to be familiar with ERISA. Sec 404c has specific tasks that, if followed, insulates plan sponsors from certain legal actions of plan participants. The plan participants will never be held to a fiduciary responsibility and 404c provides a SAFE HARBOR for compliance. The Plan Sponsor and any designated or implied fiduciaries are always the responsible parties and can be held personally liable for deficiencies. Many attorneys try to project civil law into ERISA and it is different. An investment committee is necessary to make decisions and spread the process out so that participants can be reasonably assured the the dealings are all open and without conflicts. The DOL says that the plan must be operated with the "exclusive benefits for plan participants". There is definitely no worries about getting input on plan design from the investment committee. Who else would be responsible? By the way, Company management is generally included to a degree on investment committees.

Mark N Levin, CLU, CFP, AIF of FL 12:10PM June 02, 2011

The author suggests Investment Committees hold final say over plan design issues. This seems exceedingly risky. Plan Design is a "settlor function" that should be controlled exclusively by the sponsoring company's management. If authority is given to the Investment Committee, you risk making plan design a matter of fiduciary responsibility to participants. I urge caution on this point.

David Danziger of PA 11:05PM May 25, 2011

The Smarter Investor

Get real-life investing advice from experts including Monument Wealth Management, Asset Strategy Consultants, Smart401k and Russell & Company.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Emerging Markets to Consider in 2013

The Philippines, China and other key emerging markets for this year.

Why Dow 14,000 Is a Tough Milestone

History shows this mark to be one of the most difficult for the market.

7 Mutual Funds That Make Huge Bets

These funds invest much of their portfolios in one company.

Latest Video

advertisement