Americans Are More Indebted Than the U.S. Government

July 28, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

You may remember J. Wellington Wimpy, more commonly known simply as Wimpy, Popeye's beloved friend from the iconic comic strip. Wimpy was soft-spoken and intelligent, but also cowardly, lazy, stingy, and gluttonous. A true scam artist, Wimpy usually finagled his favorite meal, a hamburger, from some unsuspecting patron at the local diner. Wimpy's parsimonious ways included his famous con line, "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today." Decades later, this character, created in 1932 during the Great Depression, has become a symbol of fiscal irresponsibility.

Today, the United States is facing its own Wimpy-esque moment in the form of the debt ceiling. The free burgers have flowed for sometime now, but the patrons have grown wise to the scam. The pitch of pushing off today's payment until some future Tuesday has become a bit haggard and worn thin for many in America. Simply look to Greece, Portugal, Spain, and others to see what it is like to have one's hamburgers taken away—and the forced diet does not look pretty.

[In Pictures: 6 Numbers Every Investor Should Follow.]

Strangely, as the U.S. citizenry passionately criticizes their government for running up the budget deficit, a greater irony is afoot: When it comes to debt management, Americans are sadly worse than their government.

While government debt sits at 94 percent of national revenue, U.S. household debt sits at a whopping 107 percent of personal income. The household balance sheets of Americans are in worse condition than anytime since the Great Depression. The ratio of household debt-to-GDP is greater than anytime since 1929. And while we all are trying to comprehend a poorer nation, many American's have not yet comprehended their own personal poverty.

A burger today? From the early 1940s through the late 1960s, an ethos of saving before spending ruled the roost. If you sought to buy a house, 20 percent was required for a down payment. Similarly, substantial savings were required to buy a car, and home furnishings, clothing, and more were paid for primarily with cash. By the 1970s, however, rampant inflation helped form a debt culture that found footing and gained steam.

[See 50 Best Funds for the Everyday Investor.]

If you saved, inflation threatened to erode the value of your savings, while the price of your desired purchases continued to rise. What was the point of saving when individuals could buy with little to nothing down, deduct interest from their federal tax obligations, and have those things they longed for?

Over the coming decades, American household debt ballooned, eventually doubling from $7 trillion to $14 trillion between 2001 and 2007. Debt fears, however, were assuaged by the rapidly growing value of real estate as homeowners used equity lines to buy more property, cars, and pay for vacations and toys. Burgers were flowing for all.

Then in 2008, the sudden and violent decline in house prices revealed just how bad the debt binge had been. Tuesday had finally arrived and like Wimpy, our wallets were a bit too thin to meet our obligations.

Feeding the furnace or building an engine. Criticizing government fiscal irresponsibility should in turn lead us to honest self examination. At the heart of this audit should be the confrontation of personal debt and the embracing of basic investing disciplines.

Each person must make a decision to feed the debt furnace or build a retirement engine.

[See What Debt-Ceiling Gridlock Means for Investors.]

Like Wimpy, we all experience the gnawing hunger to consume more than we need. Each time we reach out, through credit, for a burger today, we take our future dollars and throw them into the blazing furnace of consumption. The heat of the moment is delightful, but the end result is the poverty unfolding before our nation.

When we behave like wise and disciplined investors, we resist our pulsing appetites, take our hard earned dollars, and direct a predetermined portion to smart, long-term investments. In doing so, such investors build an engine through the miraculous power of compounding interest. Unlike Wimpy and other debtors, this interest works in your favor. Ben Franklin understood that for such savers, "Money can beget money, and its offspring can beget more." Einstein called compounding the "eighth wonder of the world."

Those who reject debt and invest wisely create a powerful engine, so that Tuesday's obligations can be fully met on time, leaving a few burgers to spare.

Steve Beck is cofounder of MarketRiders, an online investment advisory and management service helping Americans invest for retirement. MarketRiders gives investors greater peace of mind knowing that they are leveraging the best thinking of Nobel laureates and the investing methods used by the world's most elite institutions and wealthiest families. MarketRiders is on the investor's side, helping reduce investment costs and risks, and increasing retirement savings.

Tags:
investing,
mutual funds,
debt

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

When we behave as a wise and disciplined investors, resist our heartbeat appetites, take our hard earned dollars, direct and pre-determined part a smart, long-term. By doing so, as the investors build an engine through the miraculous to aggravate interest. Unlike Wimpy and other debtors, this interest works in its favor.

Marketridenema of TX 11:13PM July 31, 2011

Always time to learn from your mistakes. I just took out a 401k loan and paid off 60% of my credit card debt. That will save at least $10k in interest over the life of the loan (5 years).

Steve Bennett of AK 9:18AM July 29, 2011

In your fourth paragraph where you start comparing government debt to individual or household debt, you make the statement, "While government debt sits at 94 percent of national revenue..." and then proceed to use GDP in place of "national revenue" and compare that to household debt to income ratios. That's a completely bogus comparison since it assumes that GDP = government income. Assuming an approximate tax rate to GDP ratio of 20% (I have no idea what it really is, but I know it's not 100%) the government's debt to income ratio would be more like 500%!! That's a whole lot worse than the household ratio of 107% that you quote. Even more concerning is that fact that our government's rate of spending compared to income is actually increasing!

KGEchols of VA 1:58PM July 28, 2011

The Smarter Investor

Get real-life investing advice from experts including Monument Wealth Management, Asset Strategy Consultants, Smart401k and Russell & Company.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Emerging Markets to Consider in 2013

The Philippines, China and other key emerging markets for this year.

Why Dow 14,000 Is a Tough Milestone

History shows this mark to be one of the most difficult for the market.

7 Mutual Funds That Make Huge Bets

These funds invest much of their portfolios in one company.

Latest Video

advertisement