• Comment (23)

Don't Rush to Buy Gold

September 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print
Adam Bold

Adam Bold

Everyone seems to be chasing gold. Ads on radio and TV try to tempt you into buying bullion or mining stocks. Even local jewelry shops say to take advantage of historically high prices by trading your jewelry for cash.

The allure of gold, which has jumped from around $500 per ounce five years ago more than $1,800 today, reminds me of market darlings of yesteryear. Remember when everyone piled into dot-com stocks and drove them into bubble territory in the late 1990s? Most of those speculative Internet stocks crashed a few years later. Soon after that, people were jumping into real estate and home prices went through the roof. We all know how that turned out.

[In Pictures: 5 Ways to Measure Investment Risk.]

Most booms and busts have the same pattern. People like to buy things when prices are high. Maybe they think they'll miss the chance to make a lot of money if they don't get in like everyone else. What people forget is prices can fall as fast as they rise. They're investing based on what's happened in the past instead of what's ahead.

With prices hitting all-time highs, this is not the time to be buying gold. The time to buy an investment is before its price rises, not after a big run. I'm not saying gold can't go higher from here, and I'm not saying to "short" gold. What I am saying is the risk/reward ratio is not favorable—I would rather miss out on the last part of an upward move than get caught in the stampede after a catastrophic decline.

If you are considering adding some gold to your investments now, don't run out and buy a gold mutual fund or exchange-traded fund. You most likely have enough exposure to gold through the funds you already own. Gold and other precious metals should be a small percentage—no more than 5 percent—of your investment plan.

[See 4 Things You Should Know About Market Volatility.]

There's a good chance that you have enough exposure to gold already; some funds you own buy companies with the highest earnings growth. The economics of a gold mining stock are simple: it costs companies a relatively fixed cost to get an ounce of gold out of the ground. As the price of the metal continues to hit new highs, gold companies are generating windfall profits.

Fund managers recognized this trend, and some have added gold and precious metal-related companies to their portfolios during the last few years. For instance, Michael Cuggino, manager of Permanent Portfolio (symbol PRPFX), invests directly in gold and silver.

Before you buy any gold, check your investment plan. To determine your exposure to gold in your funds, go to Morningstar.com. On a fund's page, click the "Portfolio" tab below the fund name, then "Holdings," and scroll down to view the top 25 holdings. There might be exposure beyond what's shown, but the top 25 holdings give you an idea of the range of the investments in the portfolio through the most recent reporting period. Also, a fund company's website may provide a list of top holdings.

[See 50 Best Funds for the Everyday Investor.]

If the manager of a diversified large company mutual fund has exposure to gold, it's probably only a small share of the fund's assets. That's because gold has not historically been a good investment. And now, with big price swings of up to $50 each trading day, gold is certainly not a safe investment.

Although the strong price gains look tempting, try to resist the luster of gold. You probably already have all you need.

Adam Bold is the founder of The Mutual Fund Store, which provides fee-only investment advice with locations coast to coast. He's also host of The Mutual Fund Show, a call-in radio program broadcast across the country. Bold is author of the book The Bold Truth about Investing (April 2009). Bold is Chief Investment Officer of The Mutual Fund Research Center, an SEC-registered investment adviser, which provides mutual fund and asset allocation recommendations, and research to stores in The Mutual Fund Store system.

Tags:
gold,
investing,
mutual funds,
exchange traded funds

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Janus Contrarian (JCNAX). The next up that Bold will have sell of his "negative bias watchlist". What a joke. This fund has been in the bottom 10% in its category for the 1,3, and 5 year periods. Is ranked one of THE WORST for the 1 year, in other words 99% of funds have done BETTER than this one.

Add this to all the other brown pie loads.

Gregori Smoat of NC 11:56PM October 03, 2011

Did ANYONE notice that SILVER is down 27%?

Thank goodness I dumped all MINE just before the CRASH and bought long term TREASURIES.

Another great thing about SILVER is that you don't have to pay TAXES when you sell it at least I didn't.

OLD TIMER GOLD MINER STEVE of WV 12:57AM October 02, 2011

On today's radio commercial (10/01/11) Mr. A Bold reveals that one of his glorified, and self-proclaimed geniuses was suddenly fired, apparently for horrible performance. Investors have to assume that's all the reason is, and not some sort of malfeasance. I'm referring to the Marsico 21st Century Fund (MXXIX), which A. Bold has touted for at least the last 5 years or so. Who knows how much client money has been lost in this fund (it's averaged a 3% loss for 5 years, plus Bold's fee of 1.5% and you have a 4.5% loss per year for 5 years). The fund has lost over 20% in just the last 9 months. It's ranked in the BOTTOM 5% of funds in its category for the 1, 3, and 5 year time periods. It's UNDERPEFORMED the generic S&P 500 index by 15% over the last 3 years. This is a current theme you will find with many of the Bold recommended funds (and there are real reasons for this to occur).

In regards to MXXIX, Bold does what the mutual fund industry is very good at doing and that is burying it's slimey side of business. There are countless funds launched every year, and most of them bomb, due to performance, but the industry just folds them up, combines them with other funds or just closes them down so that the returns can't be scrutinized and the true statistics of managed funds can't be properly evaluated. If they were the industry would die a quick death. Reality is not what they want you to know.

Bold states he intends to keep client money in the fund because a new manager is taking over. He says forget evaluating this fund's past performance because none of it matters anymore.

I wonder if Adam Bold called the clients of his, who have had their hard earned savings in this cess pool of an investment for the last 5 years on his recommendation, and told them that the past returns just don't count anymore. Nor do their lost dollars and high probability to EVER recoup from losses of that magnitude.

Do the FEES that BOLD has put into his personal pocket not matter either?

The list of STINK BOMBS is growing for Adam Bold. Add MXXIX to the list. This one isn't going to be the last.

DominicG of NY 11:39PM October 01, 2011

The Smarter Investor

Get real-life investing advice from experts including Monument Wealth Management, Asset Strategy Consultants, Smart401k and Russell & Company.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Emerging Markets to Consider in 2013

The Philippines, China and other key emerging markets for this year.

Why Dow 14,000 Is a Tough Milestone

History shows this mark to be one of the most difficult for the market.

7 Mutual Funds That Make Huge Bets

These funds invest much of their portfolios in one company.

Latest Video

advertisement