AIG: The Biggest Bailout

September 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (33)

The Federal Reserve extended an $85 billion loan to American International Group to be paid back as AIG sells off some business in the biggest government takeover so far in the ongoing credit crisis. The deal is designed to let the Fed unwind AIG's hugely complex business in an "orderly manner, with the least possible disruption to the overall economy." The government will take a 79.9 stake in the firm, along with the right to suspend dividends.

The terms for lending are steep—the Libor overnight rate banks lend to each other, plus an extra 8.5 percent—and will last for two years. Robert Willumstad, AIG's CEO, will be replaced by Edward Liddy, former chairman of Allstate Corp.

AIG's plummeting stock price and Monday evening's credit downgrade by Moody's and Standard & Poor's sealed the fate of what was the nation's largest insurer. Ultimately, AIG went under because of its massive $441 billion exposure to credit default swaps (ironically, the instruments used to insure against default on assets like subprime mortgages).

It's not clear if the Fed's move was a last resort following reports that the government was trying to arrange a $70 billion to $75 billion private loan from Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. AIG also apparently rejected overtures from former chairman and CEO Hank Greenberg, who was angling for an investor-led takeover of the firm he ran for nearly four decades.

The announcement also explains the complacent nature of the Fed's decision at yesterday's meeting to leave interest rates unchanged.

Shares in Asian markets were up a bit on the news, and U.S. shares are expected to follow today. Whether gains are sustainable will depend on the Fed, AIG, and the ability of financial sector participants to unwind a player that has reach at least as wide as that of the Fed's last bailout, Bear Stearns.

My take: The deal should reassure investors worrying over an untold amount of counterparty risk in the financial system and comfort the market, given the government's guarantee that AIG won't default. That's the good news. The downside is we still don't know how to value the CDS and mortgage securities that got us into this mess in the first place. Also, with AIG's bailout coming just two weeks after the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it's still not apparent that credit markets are recovering. Further out, taxpayers are now on the hook for a few more of Wall Street's bad bets (though AIG will very likely pay off much of the balance), and the Fed's unprecedented help could result in a coming wave of equally unprecedented regulation of the financial services industry. Markets may surge today, but Wall Street will be in uncharted territory for some time.

Tags:
AIG, Inc.,
Federal Reserve,
banking

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

FiukZs

Azosvhtf of WY 2:19AM July 15, 2009

If you are trying to negotiate your mortgage with what you think is the Lender you are going to run into a lot of problems. First of all the people you are calling are the Servicer, they don't have the capacity to make a decision on modifying or negotiating your loan. They are the middle men. They are only passing on the information you are giving to them.

Patrick of FL 3:31PM March 24, 2009

Why does nobody see the big picture? If AIG is such an important Global economic structure than why is the only bailout money coming from the U.S? Let me put it this way, If you as an individual investor were to put money into your pension fund with a custodian and AIG used that money to purchase these Credit Default Swaps, who is the actual loser here? It is not AIG as none of their money was ever used. So how is it that the government wants to save a company which has, in the past, used bad investment decisions at the expense of their clients? How is it that the bonuses which were handed out 9 days ago are not supervised or had an oversight on the part of the government which bailed them out? It seems to me that this is going to be another drawn out topic of discussion until it gets to the point where no one wants to hear about it anymore and it gets swept under the rug. The entire economic crisis has been caused by the same people who are now receiving bailout money from the government. Have you ever made a bad investment? When that investment went wrong did the Government bail you out? The problem is that the wealthiest people in the world own 98% of the worlds wealth. Now where does that leave the rest of us? We have to comply with the rules and regulations that these wealthy people create!!! Think about it. What is the tallest building in any city? It is usually owned by a bank!!

Patrick of FL 2:39PM March 24, 2009

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement