Global Rate Cut: A Good Start but Not Enough

October 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Today's unprecedented decision by the world's central banks to cut interest rates around the globe is exactly what the market needs. Unfortunately, it looks more like admission of what's going wrong in the global financial system than a true solution.

Panic selling on Monday and Tuesday that sent the Dow below 10,000 was caused by consensus on Wall Street that the government's $700 billion bailout plan simply didn't address fears that the credit crisis is spreading like wildfire outside of America's borders. That hasn't stopped. If anything, it's gotten worse this week. Banks simply aren't lending. Investors are willing to hide out in treasuries even though they're offering no return.

The problem is, rate cuts alone don't put a value on mortgage assets or send capital directly into the banking sector. Rate cuts begin the process, but with fear in the markets at record levels, traders could simply take the action as a last-ditch (and possibly belated) attempt to get in front of an almost insurmountable loss of confidence.

Some quick reactions, and some plans for what to do next:

Carl Weinberg of High Frequency Economics says the Depression playbook has been opened:

The objective of policy—actually, the only thing policy makers can hope to do—is to take steps to ensure that the event is dampened so that only a recoverable downturn of national economies is suffered. Otherwise, a dip into an unrecoverable—or at least, prolonged and deep—depression is the alternative.

The playbook is this then: Push interest rates as close to zero as the central bankers dare. Other than Japan, there is still room for more rate cuts, and an urgent need for them according to our understanding of how the world works. Next, pump as much safe money into the hands of non-bank private sector. Yes, this means central bank credit to business, and maybe even to individuals. Banks have ceased to function as financial intermediaries, and the central banks have to go around them to keep the economy lubricated. Finally, massive fiscal stimulus is needed, immediately. While normal rules of public finance tell us that deficit spending is bad, the alternative to massive public support of private demand right now is a lot worse.

Nouriel Roubini tells Henry Blodget the rate cut is helpful but not enough. He calls for a huge $300 billion (a new New Deal) increase in government spending to cut out the coming shortfall from consumers.

David Malpass at Encima Global says the next step could see Treasury stepping in to recapitalize the banks:

I expect the Treasury facility to evolve into buying preferred stock. Treasury may make this announcement today.

  • If Treasury decides to buy preferred stock, it will be a very positive evolution of the bailout plan. I disagree with the view that it should be interpreted as a partial nationalization of banks. Instead, it is a stop-gap measure during a crisis.
  • It will add capital to banks to partially offset the arbitrary mark-to-market decapitalization of recent months. This is a critical step in getting banks to lend.

That doesn't mean hopes for an eventual recovery in stocks are completely dashed. Analysts are tiptoeing around the possibility that stocks are setting up for a bottom simply based on the theory that markets are well within historical bear territory and the huge liquidity injections provided by central banks will have an impact. But there's no concrete evidence global rout in stocks is over yet.

Coordination among central bankers is a hopeful sign. They'll need to continue working together to keep this crisis from getting worse.

Tags:
banking,
economy,
global economy,
Wall Street,
interest rates

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What a nation of savers we'll (not) be when interest rates go down to zero. Are they nuts or what?

Interest to depositors must equal inflation.

If not, you're kidding yourself about any economic future.

of 4:07PM October 08, 2008

We have reached the end of the utility of Roubini's analysis. He has been the one telling us that nothing can be valued, yet he wants to "triage" banks and recapitalize them. Based on what? So he is contradicting himself: he says nothing can be valued, but his suggestions are based on the idea that things can be valued.

It's idiotic.

No, the only thing to do is what I have been suggesting for over two years (to him and others) and which is part of the movement away from the West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) "scrutiny" regime toward what I describe as the "maintenance" regime: policy maintains important facts (important using the test laid out by the Court in West Virginia v. Barnette). All this I describe in my book, The Eminent Domain Revolt (New York: Algora, 2006).

We have to have an immediate, individually enforceable, permanent, complete and absolute ban on housing evictions.

Never mind this "prime the pump" bridge to nowhere nonsense. FDR, JFK and LBJ are dead. No more of this corrupt nonsense. The political system doesn't want to ban housing evictions because it knows that doing so will take away the power of the political system over housing (in "scrutiny" regime terms, it will elevate housing from "minimum" scrutiny to "strict" scrutiny--any lawyer or judge will tell you that this means a Constitutional revolution in the United States: well bring it on!). However, the political system's power over housing has already disappeared. People will--of course!!--reject the mass evictions which are going to happen first thing in this Depression.

So enough of dropping money from helicopters. Instead, drop the political system's opposition to a ban on housing evictions.

John Ryskamp

John Ryskamp of CA 12:54PM October 08, 2008

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement