AIG: $1 Salary For CEO

November 25, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Looks like AIG's perk-filled glory days are officially over starting with CEO Edward Liddy, who is following a time-honored tradition at troubled companies by slashing his salary to a buck.

Via the WSJ:

American International Group Inc. put restrictions on executive salaries, including a $1 salary for its chief executive, and said it wouldn't give bonuses in 2008 or raises in 2009 to its top seven officers.

The company also said there would be no raises through 2009 for the 50 next-highest executives.

CEO Edward M. Liddy won't be eligible for severance payments during the period, either. He said the company and its executives believe the move shows it is focused on "overcoming [its] financial challenges so AIG can return value to taxpayers and shareholders."

The announcement comes after New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sent a letter to Mr. Liddy earlier this month saying AIG should be "completely transparent" about its compensation plans for 2008.

The insurance giant earlier this month ended 14 deferred compensation plans that affected 5,600 employees, saying all deferred pay would be distributed in the first quarter. The deferred compensation is pay that workers earned but volunteered to get at a later date. Most of the plans allowed participants to access the deferred pay only when they retired or left the company.

AIG had said it was concerned that employees would leave the company to get  their deferred pay.

The company also said it is working to ensure no taxpayer money goes toward bonuses for its top 60 executives.

AIG stirred controversy last month when it held a week-long retreat at the pricey St. Regis Resort in California, where rooms can cost more than $1,000 a night, less than a week after it received $85 billion as part of the U.S. government's bailout program. Copies of invoices distributed by a House committee looking into the company show AIG paid more than $440,000, including nearly $7,000 for golf and $23,000 in spa charges.

Our own Luke Mullins chronicled in-your-face spending by AIG and others here, here and here.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The CEOs and executives of all the failing companies should be held responsible and accountable for the financial fiasco they caused through their neglect and criminal behavior. Criminals they are, unfortunately, because they are multi-millionaires and buddies of the Bush Administration they continue in their positions and this is why there is a great lack of confidence in the so-called "free market" and in particular Wall Street.

The educated asses or Wall Street tycoons should be arrested, fined and forced to pay their fair share of this disaster. They are the culprits and cause of the financial doom of the nation and should not be allowed to walk around free of criminals charges. At least tar and feather them, the nation would feel better if they were treated like the criminals and pariahs that they are.

Ann of 3:25PM November 25, 2008

My analysis is not fully formed but our society is awfully confused. We have no sense of fairness nor balance. We will put a person behind bars for years for harming himself and perhaps several others for years and years for using illegal drugs but when highly educated people destroy the lives of hundreds and even hundreds of thousands of people, they are allowed to continue to work and face no jail time at all. They often continue to be paid. The financial industry has failed us miserably as has the congressional committees charged with oversight and many of these same people are positions of doling out huge sums of money to those who have failed and harmed us. It is an incredible parody of justice.

The assessment of harm needs to include the impact that these folks have caused to society and in fact upon the globe. The creation of credit default swaps and other instruments had only goal to take someone else's money without providing any other goods or service. Certainly economists and those in the financial sector begin immediately throwing out terms such as "efficiency" and "liquidity' but in the end. it was all about taking someone else's money in such a byzantine fashion that most were unclear as to exactlt what was happening. You may laugh at these words but these folks only hope for eternity is that there is no God, no higher being, because many of these financial hijinks have been as deadly and as malicious as murder.

Art of CT 1:53PM November 25, 2008

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement