Today In Layoffs: Macy's, Morgan Stanley

February 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Another Monday, another round of layoffs. Today's magic number is 4 percent. That's how much Macy's is shaving off of its headcount, cutting 7,000 positions as it restructures to survive the slowdown. Actually, the "restructuring" also looks like a "gutting." Some 40 percent of its executive positions are on the block as the retailer tries a new "decentralized" strategy, according to Forbes. Investors don't appear to like the move. Macy's shares were off nearly 5 percent in late trade. (It also might have something to do with Macy's slashing its quarterly dividend to 5 cents a share from around 13.25 cents.)

Meanwhile, the WSJ is reporting Morgan Stanley is planning a 3-4 percent reduction in headcount, or 1,500 to 1,800 jobs. The cuts, which could come this month, are on top of some 7,000 layoffs at Morgan during 2008. It's no surprise banks are still cutting back. Finance has been by far the hardest-hit sector in this downturn. Job losses during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 topped 120,000. The WSJ also says big investment banks like Goldman Sachs are considering more cuts as well.

So who's hiring? The federal government. From the Associated Press:

Since 2001, civilian employment in the executive branch, excluding postal employees, has edged upward from 1.7 million to about 2 million, largely because of new homeland security jobs.

More federal job openings are on the horizon.

A report released in January by Christina Romer, head of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and Jared Bernstein, an economic policy adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, predicted that more than 90 percent of the 3 million to 4 million jobs that Obama proposes to save or create would be in the private sector.

But the report also estimated that 244,000 government jobs — some at the federal level, but more at the state and local level — would be created or saved.

That was based on a $600 billion stimulus package; the one being debated in Congress is more than $800 billion.

(Looking for one of those jobs? Check FedJobs.com.) Or you could go work at Lehman Brothers!

That's right: The WSJ says working for Lehman is "one of the hottest jobs on Wall Street."  I-bankers are scrambling to get hired at the failed investment bank to help wind down "a broad patchwork of assets" including a "thicket of about 500,000 derivative contracts with 4,000 trading partners worth some $24 billion." Plus, they'll get to work alongside former Lehman CEO Richard Fuld who's still haunting the halls of his old bank. Sounds like a tough gig to me. A job's a job, I suppose, but who wants to spend the next couple of years reliving what went wrong?

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That is a very ignorant statement to make. So according to his suggestions maybe we should invade other countries like Mexico and Iran and Venezuela and as many as we can and send all the laid off workers to the new "War jobs program". Is it George Bush who wrote that comment? cause he also stated he used to have conversations with god.

josh of TX 10:18AM February 03, 2009

That's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard, I guess the writer suggest that we prolong the war just to save jobs. I guess that logic would also support the idea that the war will also cause death to some of those soldiers, therefore reducing the unemployment burden. Is this person not following the news? A majority of these soldiers may in fact at some point be deployed to support the war in Afghanistan, thus perhaps pleasing the writer who says, "War is a jobs program"

Monty Hall of FL 7:56AM February 03, 2009

You haven't seen anything, wait until the new Obama unemplyment plan goes into affect. What do I mean by that? Well there is 145,000 soldiers in Iraq and all those folks are coming home at the same time and the majority of those folks are Army Reserve and National Guard and not acitve duty. What do you think the impact to unemployment is going to be? A lot of those folks have done 2 and 3 tours and most likely gave up jobs or losted them. Law or no law! Let's see the little impact to that decision! If I was Obama I might want to rethink that decision. Cheers have a quick way of turning into Boo's, especially when you don't have a job and you have a family to feed. War is a jobs program no matter how you want to look at it. With 145,000 service members coming home who doesn't thing that's going to hurt. If you don't than who cares about these companies laying off.

Joker of DC 4:56AM February 03, 2009

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement