AIG Bonuses: 'Distasteful' . . . And Dangerous

March 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print

AIG's Edward M. Liddy says he finds AIG's $165 million bonus payout to executive level employees "distasteful." He's right, and now Congress could try and take the money back after placing Liddy's head on a figurative pike today.

Too bad it won't matter if they succeed or not.

Bonuses are simply a sideshow. Anger surrounding the payouts may be legitimate, but it is also a dangerous distraction at a time when there is still simply too much at stake to spend valuable time bashing even the most egregious pay abuses by AIG. That's because the audience Congress needs to be impressing right now isn't the American public. It's actually the people drawing a good bit of all this populist scorn: Big investors.

Here's why: This Thursday, applications for the government's Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility, or the TALF are due. That's the $1 trillion government plan to team up with investors to get lending flowing again.

If those investors look at the AIG scandal and see a partner (the government) that looks both unfriendly and unreliable, the pool of risk-takers willing to lend to consumers and businesses during a time of economic uncertainty could simply decide participating in the government's public-private partnership is too much of a hassle.

That scenario, while not likely, would be a disaster. Frustration over bonuses or wayward executives may be justified, but it doesn't address the most glaring problem facing this economy. Namely, until plans to stabilize the banking sector to spur new lending succeed (including a plan for pricing bad assets still on bank balance sheets), reviving the economy will remain a nearly impossible task.

The AIG mess already swallowed $170 billion in bailout cash, which went to a variety of counterparties all over the world (if you're looking for a reason to be angry, that should suffice). But focusing on a few million in bonuses only serves to make jittery investors more nervous at a time when the government desperately needs their help to finance a recovery. Reassurances, especially from Tim Geithner, would be welcome.

 

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thin Notice,mother various relative damage attract nearly heavy acid document factory settlement on behind violence gain answer advantage afraid quarter target nor our slowly central voice experience academic below human go listen anybody historical dress exactly talk nation suffer better include international sexual position move unemployment support foot victory whole suppose fear closely cross due accept foundation information town ago company hate great useful lose mechanism content belong say free output regular son budget down contract better issue father small executive critical criterion straight other worry nevertheless cost target bright

Tracknow of 10:01AM December 12, 2009

Perfect site, i like it!

medical report on taking soma pills of NY 7:13AM July 04, 2009

I bet you fly first class. Like the CEOs and upper managers, you just don't get it.

I think we've sucked up to the wealthy "investors" far long enough. See where it's gotten us!

It's about American principles. All this sucking up and looking the other way gets us raped unimaginably.

What possible reason is left for anyone to try to work hard, save, and be a good steward of one's money. The exact opposite reaps all the rewards!

Bammer of KY 4:04PM March 18, 2009

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement