Shadows Over Green Shoots

May 5, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Stocks are rallying, the economy looks like it's (possibly) bottoming, and Ben Bernanke says growth could resume this year. So what's not to like? One word: Credit.

In a lengthy post, ContraryInvestor.com (re-posted in full at Zero Hedge) outlines why a sustained recovery in the credit market remains the province of wishful thinking. Without the Federal Reserve's help, sickly markets for mortgage- and asset-backed securities and even commercial paper might still be threatening to swamp the entire financial system just as they did during the worst of the crisis late last year. Scarily, stocks might simply be ignoring that fact. From the post:

The equity market has certainly caught the attention of the investment community as of late. Time to take a much needed and very important detour in this discussion. Right to the point, let’s review the character of the credit market. Certainly a general sense of optimism has risen as the equity market has levitated as of late. And that sense of optimism engenders the thinking that the economy and general financial market conditions MUST be getting better because rising equities are simply foreshadowing such an outcome. In other words, history has taught us that equities lead and so if equities are rising, the implication is better days lie ahead. But in the current cycle, we all know that credit market issues have been the locus of distress and the exact cause for a dramatic loss of wealth in financial assets really globally. So although it’s certainly fun to watch the equity markets romp higher, it’s the credit markets that deserve a really big piece of our attention. Better days lie ahead as a generic comment when both the equity and credit markets are healing in simultaneous fashion.

This should give bullish investors real pause. We've slowly been creeping back into picking stocks, touting fundamentals, eyeing breakout sectors, and all the rest of the usual analysis that gets done when the threat of systemic market disruption is absent. It isn't, and we should take care not to pretend otherwise.

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Wall Street investors need to pay attention to US treasuries instead of jumping into stocks. Why? Because the government can only raise money three ways: 1. Tax it out of the people 2. Borrow it by selling Treasuries with the promise of paying interest on them or 3. print it. Our glorious members of Congress (which, by the way, is the only govt body that can spend money or raise taxes...the president can only either sign the bill into law or veto it)...anyway, since September of last year Congress has now spent 4.4 Trillion dollars and obligated us for another 7 trillion in future years. This year, in order to get the money to spend, the govt must sell 1.75 Trillion in treasuries by the end of the fiscal year which ends on 30 September. This is almost as much money as the surplus that the Chinese have in their bank. The question is: who is going to buy all these treasuries? It is clear that the Chinese and the Japanese aren't going to buy much more. They, along with South Korea and 10 other asian nations just agreed last week to establish a regional reserve of $120 Billion. In addition, China has made currency swaps with other nations. It is clear that they are setting up a regional reserve currency. This is straight up decoupling from the dollar. The reserve agreement hammered out last week also includes the selling of asian bonds. So, back to the question: Who will buy US treasuries? Europe? Africa? South America? Australia? Certainly not China and Japan...they have so much on their plate with setting up their regional reserve currency. Perhaps Martians or some other Extra-terrestials will buy them?

The answer is: our own central bank (aka the Fed). They will print the money and buy the IOUs (treasuries) from the US Treasury Department. In short, our government is going to have to print trillions. If the dollar does not collapse, it will will be the first time in the history of economics that multiplying the money supply by four, five or six times doesn't result in inflation.

(Can you say Argentina, boys and girls? How about Weimar Republic? Zimbabwe? Iceland?)

Financing the massive federal spending will prove impossible without either gargantuine interest rates or massive devaluing of the dollar. So investors should be concerned. If you buy a stock that doubles in its dollar value, you haven't made any profit if the value of the dollar declines to 20% of its value since the time when you made the investment. So having twice as many dollars hasn't gained you anything. Such investors will lose twice. First, their return on investment will be paid to them in less-valuable dollars. Second, in nominal terms, you will have made twice as many dollars...hence you will have to pay a capital gains tax on it. So investors lose more wealth. Investors in dollar denomianted assets will lose several fold.

In my opinion, the only green shoots showing up in the economy are weeds that will soon choke the life out of the US economy.

R. P. Reitz of FL 10:17PM May 09, 2009

the Fed has it so banks can borrow for essentially nothing, and you've got a credit problem? No you have a bank regulatory problem. Let's try this rule. Lend at reasonable rates---or get off the pot. These jerks are spoiled loaning to your credit card at 10-40% instead of functioning as servants of the public trust. Time for a re-definition. Lets get Barney Frank and Chris Dodd together and do a bill.

Muser of NM 8:43PM May 05, 2009

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement