Markets Cheer Fannie, Freddie Takeover

Will the euphoria last?

September 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print

The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout: Get a little excited—but just a little.

The most dramatic move by regulators so far to end the credit crisis sent stocks up Monday, but the cheering cooled as questions emerged over just how much the plan to shore up the government-sponsored lenders will really help.

The government's decision to place Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship (see background here and here) bolsters hopes that this latest intervention will provide the necessary spark to finally revive lenders and investors who have shunned all manner of risk-taking and new investment for the better part of the past year. The rescue comes after Friday's surprise jump in new foreclosures mixed with last week's market slump that had some investors worried that stocks could push back toward yearly lows set in July. This deal ended such talk, at least for today.

"On the margin, it's positive for one of the biggest issues in the U.S. economy," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group. "There's a positive reaction any time uncertainty is cleared up. Most people feel good about it. It was the least evil of all paths."

Led by a rally in financial stocks, the Dow jumped 250 points this morning before settling back, while Fannie and Freddie shares lost more than 80 percent of their already decimated values. By noon, however, the market's wider gains were pared as those same financial firms, including Washington Mutual (WM), which soared 20 percent on news of the departure of CEO Kerry Killinger, reversed.

The market's response underscores just how much depends on getting the credit crisis under control and just how unconvinced some investors remain about real progress in improving markets or the economy.

What remains to be seen is if this latest and by far largest bailout can accomplish what increased Federal Reserve lending, interest rate cuts, and the May bailout of Bear Stearns ultimately failed to do: keep mortgage rates from spiking and restore calm to lenders still unwilling to turn cash taps back on.

At first glance, analysts are optimistic that the move can finally crack dammed-up investment by bringing down mortgage rates and improve the availability of credit. Treasury bond prices fell Monday as investors left such safe-haven assets, following the announcement that the Treasury would buy mortgage securities in the open market. The housing market still faces rising foreclosures, falling prices, and a large inventory of unsold homes, but right now market investors are simply looking for any sign that the worst is over in housing. With a plan for the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) in place, housing is one step closer to hitting bottom.

Merrill Lynch agrees Treasury is "bringing out the 'bazooka' " with this bailout but questions its lasting effects on markets:

This is yet another example that policy officials remain in reactive mode just as they were that weekend in mid-March when the Fed orchestrated the BSC takeover; and again in mid-July when the government made the guaranty of GSE mortgages more explicit.

In both instances, the equity markets appeared to be falling off the table to only then enjoy a brief short-covering rally, led by the financials. Considering that the first weekend intervention in mid-March resulted in a powerful two-month bear market rally, and the second weekend intervention in mid-July only provided about two weeks of recovery, one has to wonder whether this third weekend intervention is going to have much staying power at all.

Goldman Sachs calls it a "very positive step" but keeps an eye toward what it could cost taxpayers:

Tags:
Fannie Mae,
Treasury Department,
Freddie Mac,
government intervention,
Henry Paulson,
stock market,
Wall Street,
housing

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'm very conservative in what I think the Government should be involved with. The Three exceptions I have are 1. Military, protecting us and our rights, 2. Education, investing in our future, 3. Home Ownership, The American Dream. Everything else Anyone else can do a better job than Government.

Ben Townsend of CO 1:24AM September 09, 2008

What's the happiness all about?

The US government just added 12 trillion dollars in financial obligations to it's books.

Just precisely, how, is this good for anybody in the stock market? Why should the market be rallying over this?

This is being billed all over the place as a Good Thing(TM), what it is, is severely inflationary and since housing prices aren't going to come down, and buyers aren't going to be entering the market, it's going to lock up the housing market entirely.

The more of this garbage I see, and the more I see US Pravda heralding it as a great thing, and the more the markets act entirely illogically, the less I trust our system to be a free one, because it isn't.

This has done absolutely nothing for the economy. Nothing at all. It won't create jobs, it won't decrease consumer debt, it won't free up lending, it won't make banks solvent, it won't do anything at all that is positive.

All this has done is make the Chinese happy, which we now have to do, otherwise, they're going to take their trillion dollars of T-Bills, and dump them on an currency exchange.

Richard Wicks of CA 7:54PM September 08, 2008

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Is Your Portfolio Ready for a Double-Dip?

With the looming threat of a double-dip recession, investors should position their portfolios to protect themselves from another downturn.

advertisement