The Future of the U.S. Economy: 2050

February 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Think back to 1967. The job you have today may not even have existed. The Internet, and all the jobs that have come with it, were decades away. The Detroit automakers were dominant. Quality of life was different, too: The median household income was an inflation-adjusted $40,261, compared with $50,303 in 2008. There were also a hundred million fewer of us; 1967 was the year the U.S. population hit 200 million. We passed the 300 million mark in 2006, and by 2050, there will very likely be more than 400 million Americans. The lifestyle of the average American may change just as much from 2010 to 2050 as it did from 1967 to 2006. The economy will especially undergo change.

[See 21 Things We're Learning to Live Without.]

Joel Kotkin, distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University, has spent a lot of time thinking about exactly what those changes might look like in 2050. He previously wrote a book about the history of American cities, but in his new book, The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, he looks ahead to how recent economic and demographic trends may play out over the next few decades. Here are a few of the book's most striking predictions.

[See 10 Tips for Picking the Right Retirement Spot.]

1. The death of the suburbs is highly exaggerated. In the 20th century, the suburbs became the primary place for Americans to live. But the recent housing market crash, high gas prices, and concerns about environmental sustainability have caused many to wonder how long suburbs will be able to grow. Kotkin writes that the suburbs will not only continue to grow; they will become even more like cities. "The suburbs of the future will in many ways be more diverse than the cities," Kotkin told U.S. News. While the suburbs of the 1950s were predominantly white, suburbs today have an increasing number of ethnic minorities and recent immigrants. A major reason suburbs are changing is that they are providing more jobs than ever. Historically, people living in bedroom communities outside of a city have commuted downtown to work. Suburbs are also becoming more appealing because they are developing their own cultural amenities. "Many have rebuilt town centers and revived Main Streets," says Kotkin.

This growth will be made possible—and desirable, Kotkin argues—because suburbs will become what he calls "greenurbia." Kotkin predicts that while cars will continue to be the dominant mode of transportation, fuel-economy improvements, more energy-efficient homes, and telecommuting will allow suburbs to coexist with a clean environment.

2. The rise of "luxury cities." Cities, however, are not on the way out. Kotkin points to New York and San Francisco as models for some cities in the future: expensive places that are playgrounds for younger and often single residents. This is one trend that Kotkin finds worrisome. "New York has got to be able to hold on to enough middle-class people, ages 30 to 45," he says. The "luxury city" also creates problems for residents' upward mobility. Kotkin's chief concern is that even as more ethnic minorities join the middle class, the ability for people in the middle class to enjoy the same lifestyle as the upper class in their cloistered cities will be limited. "Class, not race, is going to be the great American issue," says Kotkin.

3. Jobs get more virtual. Jobs are perhaps the biggest concern of Americans today. Kotkin looks to new businesses that began during the recession to point the way to the future of jobs. "There has been a huge surge in the number of independent proprietorships," says Kotkin. Thanks to the Internet, the average entrepreneur does not need a large corporation in an office building to run a business and can instead find people to help run the business online. "Some of these jobs are going to places like China and India, but they are also going to places like North Dakota," says Kotkin.

That's not to say that physical locations for businesses will be unnecessary or that rural towns in the heartland can be just as innovative as large metropolitan areas. "You'll still have centers. Wall Street will still be a center of finance, for example. Their market shares will reduce over time, however," says Kotkin.

Tags:
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (49)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

BHPMOTO-

Whatever the free (i.e. not Obama central planning) market dictates. That is the point, Obama-brand solar panels or battery-explosive "dirty coal electric cars" won't cut it, but, say, quantum-computing technology, private venture-capitalist financed civilian passenger/space aviation, market-based innovation in energy production/efficient consumption (i.e., natural gas transportation/clean coal), nano-technology, etc...you name it. Neither the kleptocrats in Beijing nor the Obama Administration's Keynsian Orwellians will ultimately decide US/China's economic future. So, socialism/central planning=no prosperity, for sure. This is not to say there is no government role, just that government cannot create any "new" economy.

chris m of IL 10:56PM December 16, 2011

What everybody seems to have left out is; where is this innovation for the new economy going to be coming from? our big problem at the moment is access to education; and the U.S. is not providing at the moment. we are leaving it up to socialist contries who provide free education to their best students to lead the world. Do we also need to become socialist? Or do we chip in for our brightst so that we can retire in peace.

work hard, pay your taxes, support your local community, and then we can retire to a life of leisure and helping our community.

bhpmoto of WA 3:43AM December 08, 2011

Sina,

Become global? Like, China? Laughable. Repression of ethnic and religious minorities hardly renders you cosmopolitan or "global". Yes,you have KFC, but do you have "America Town" in Shanghai like US has "China town" in NYC, Chicago, San Francisco?

Neither are you (mainland China) a true Tiger economy, and Hong Kong evolved via Westernization.

China has always claimed to be the "Middle Kingdom". Kingdom of Copy, you say???? More likely Mainland China has stolen or bribed much of what it has acquired technology-wise, primarily through industrial espionage, but also via Hong Kong. What has truly originated in mainland China in the last 1,000 years? Really??? America's (temporary) malaise is hardly China's ascent to primacy. Your confusion stems from erroneous zero-sum thinking and it is you who fails to see the big picture. If US becomes third world (never happen), then so China would, even more than western China already is.

Unfortunately, toeing the Communist Party line and state-run media does not render you an objective arbiter of facts.

China is to be commended for lifting much of its population out of poverty and only reformers (Deng Xiaoping) accomplished what Mao couldn't, but mainland China is hardly the capital of the tech sector or model of efficient industry-it is a paper Tiger but not Asian Tiger. In fact, US manufacturing workers are much, much more productive and technically competent-100,000 unskilled peasants cannot match its US workforce counterpart, except in a race towards the bottom in relative wages.

To suggest a country with stifling corruption, lack of real innovation, jack-booted authoritarianism, a housing bubble of its own ready to collapse, massive rural poverty and repressed ethnic/religious/political minorities, arbitrary enforcement of law and government control of media, internet and the kangaroo-court judiciary, is FIRST WORLD while the US is becoming THIRD WORLD, is to truly toe the Beijing Party Line.

China aspires to great-nation status, but acts like a third-world dictatorship with respect to its people (and Tibet, etc...) Deflating the value of its currency and mega-violations of free trade agreements, also known as CHEATING, is not befitting great-nation status.

Yes, America has huge problems, but third world? Stop toeing the Party line, please.

Chris M Elgin of IL 8:30PM November 26, 2011

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Is Your Portfolio Ready for a Double-Dip?

With the looming threat of a double-dip recession, investors should position their portfolios to protect themselves from another downturn.

advertisement