Your Guide to the Goldman Sachs Lawsuit

April 20, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

During the downturn, Goldman was hardly the only firm that allowed investors to employ these naked credit default swaps. In fact, naked shorts are viewed by many as one of the prime reasons why the housing collapse was so painful. "The naked CDS … wreaked havoc on the market," says Greenberger.

That's because when these shorts are part of synthetic deals, investors are not constrained by physical supplies. Kopff uses the example of home insurance. In that industry, people can only buy as many insurance policies as there are actual houses.

"Once everyone's insured, you've hit the maximum. There's no more insurance that can be written," he says. "While that number can be exceedingly high, it is finite. When you allow naked positions, you allow what doesn't exist in the hazard insurance industry … Now you have someone saying, 'Listen, you've got a house over there, and I'm going to bet that lightning hits it.' And then somebody else comes in and says, 'Well, I'm going to bet that lightning doesn't hit it.' And you can have as many bets as you want."

This, in turn, compounded the losses that investors experienced when the housing market went under. "Essentially, [investors] found people who would give them insurance on the question of whether subprime mortgages would be paid," says Greenberger. "So every time a subprime mortgage collapsed, it wasn't just the real loss of the mortgage, but it was the loss of all the betting that was done on whether the mortgage would survive or not survive."

As the Goldman case continues to attract attention, the debate about swaps is likely to intensify. Importantly, this will happen right as Congress considers a sweeping financial overhaul package, one which many would like to see take a harder position on swaps and other similar deals.

Still, swaps do have ardent defenders who argue that when used correctly, they can actually reduce the riskiness of investors' portfolios. But as the Goldman case illustrates, these defenders are pitted against an American public that is clamoring for tighter regulations. Says Greenberger, "I think there's been a widespread desire to see some accountability for this horrific crisis."

Tags:
lawsuits,
Goldman Sachs

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Check this out -

www.baitandswitchtv.com

Click on games and throw some cr*p at the bankers.

rebeccah wilde of CA 1:08PM May 17, 2010

Paulson's picks had no effect on the outcome. He might have thought that they would; but the subprime collapse was so comprehensive that the ones he thought were especially bad were no worse than the rest. The picking issue is just a distraction.

walstir 7:40PM May 04, 2010

"Everyone" in the industry knew that CDOs and credit default swaps were a nightmare. Charlie Munger wrote about them in "Poor Charlie's Almanack" over three years before the collapse. Bond salespeople called CDOs "toxic waste."

Yet, at the same time, hedge fund managers and other so-called sophisticated investors loved CDOs for their high returns, and were willing to take the risks. Painting Goldman as criminals is clever scapegoating, but not much more.

http://frostfinance.blogspot.com/2010/04/goldman-sachs-buy-or-sell.html

E Frost 1:53AM May 01, 2010

Most Connected Company

Find out how America’s best companies are succeeding by tapping big data, mobile solutions, social media, and crowdsourcing to adapt and compete in an increasingly connected world.

See the companies »

advertisement

Slide Shows

Best-Sellers to Help Your 2013 Finances

Seeking advice? Check out these acclaimed financial books.

10 Warning Signs of Identity Theft

About 10 million Americans fall victim each year.

Items You Should Buy Online

Skip the store to save money and time.

Latest Video

advertisement