What 3.2 Percent GDP Growth Says About Our Contradictory Economy

April 30, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The Commerce Department's announcement that the U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 3.2 percent during the first quarter has touched off a veritable mixed bag of reactions. "Stocks Slip as GDP, Sentiment Disappoint," CNBC glumly declared in an early-morning headline. Meanwhile, the Washington Post called the statistic "evidence that the economic recovery continues to plug along but that growth is not accelerating in a way that would bring down joblessness rapidly." The Wall Street Journal was far more upbeat: "The U.S. economy grew briskly in the first quarter, driven by businesses stocking up on goods for a strengthening consumer demand stoked by the lowest core inflation number in 51 years," it said. 

These divergent viewpoints raise a number of fundamental questions. Namely, are we all talking about the same economy? And if so, how can growth be brisk, disappointing, and mediocre all at once?

The good. One of the bigger stories coming out of the Commerce Department's report is the uptick in consumer spending, which grew at an annual rate of 3.6 percent in the first quarter. This compares favorably to the 1.6 percent increase during the last quarter of 2009 and represents the largest expansion since 2007. "The most encouraging news in the report was the strong growth of key types of private spending by consumers," Christina Romer, the chair of President Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in a blog post.

Since the economy has now grown for three consecutive quarters, analysts and politicians are also optimistic about the likelihood that a sustainable trend is settling in. "After the single biggest economic crisis in our lifetimes, we're heading in the right direction," Obama said on Friday, "We're moving forward. Our economy is stronger; that economic heartbeat is growing stronger."

Meanwhile, even a slowly expanding U.S. economy can provide support for the stock market. That's particularly true when coupled with recent news that China's GDP is expected to surge by 10 percent this year, offering key opportunities to the growing pool of U.S. companies that are looking abroad for profits. "Moderate growth in the United States coupled with 10 percent growth in China is great for the U.S. stock market," says Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business.

The bad. Still, moderate growth is "simply not enough to bring down unemployment," says Morici. As a result, the unemployment rate, which currently sits at 9.7 percent and appears unlikely to budge in any significant way until employer confidence rebounds, remains perhaps the biggest impediment to a full-out recovery. Obama acknowledged this on Friday, conceding that, "'You're hired' is the only economic news [Americans] are waiting to hear."

[See Why the Unemployment Rate Refuses to Budge.]

Also discouraging is the decreasing pace of growth. Notably, the first quarter's 3.2 percent growth rate is down from 5.6 percent for the last three months of 2009. "We're still far from running on all cylinders," says Diane Swonk, the chief economist at the Chicago-based firm Mesirow Financial. "As good as it is to get 3.2 percent growth, given the losses we've seen we should be seeing several multiples of that at this stage of the game."

A final cause for skepticism is the anemic housing sector, which took a beating during the first quarter. Overall, residential fixed investment, which is primarily a measure of construction projects, contracted at an annual rate of nearly 11 percent.

The mediocre. While economic expansion is usually cause for at least muted celebration among policymakers, GDP is a backward-looking indicator. With sovereign debt crises looming and financial reform—and the uncertainty it can inject into the market—on the horizon, the economy faces a number of immediate hurdles not captured in a single quarterly growth report. "It's reflective of where we've been, not of where we're going," says Swonk.

Another roadblock, says Swonk, is that the burgeoning consumer spending levels cannot be sustained without more robust job growth. "The consumer is struggling to do the best that it can, and the numbers look really good on the surface. But the reality is you can't expect this consumer to carry the expansion, nor should you," she says. "At the end of the day, I think we can take some solace in the fact that the recovery continues, but without jobs, [sustainability is] a problem."

Tags:
GDP,
global economy,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Just before leaving, Mubarak inflated Egypt civil servant wages +15%. Imagine Egypt civil servants would made 40% of GDP as Greece bureaucrats: then Egypt GDP would increase +6% just because Egyptian civil servants earning +15% more!

Every dictator knows the trick: borrow more on one side to pays the civil servants more on the other side, and it will make GDP rise, so the banks will think everything is OK, and will lend the money without problem!Jean

You see: GDP rise is not "THE" criterium to follow!

In december 2010, Europa borrowed 1 billion EUR just for paying 13th and 14th salaries to Europa bureaucrats earning already 9'000 EUR/month: you see that the European dictators of the unique thought also knows the tricks!

The problem is because the "production" of the civil servants is admitted to be equal to their "costs"! National accountability rules should be changed!

Jean-Francois Morf 1:34PM February 15, 2011

We will, as Americans, work our way out of economic dispair. The economy will slowly grow, Americans will reduce their debt and markets will stabilize. Without hard times, we would not recognize the benefits of good times, nor would we appreciate the fruits of our innovation, hardwork and labor. With out contraction, an expansion would not be nearly as inspiring -- feelings of hope and optimism take hold in expansionary times. When strong economic growth returns, hopefully it will be fueled by productivity increases and not credit card limit increases.

Americans have been through worse economic upheavels in the past and we have survived -- the Great Depression, massive government debt brought on by WWII, the rampant inflation of 1970's, and now this -- the Great Recession. Comparatively speaking, this economic crises is nothing compared to some of the travails Americans have endured in the past 100 years. I suspect, as a nation, we will come out just fine, but as an individual I'm not so sure. In the short run, am I doomed to be underemployed, underpaid and overworked? As for retirement, I don't worry about that because I'll probably die of exhaustion trying to pay my bills.

At least I have a job, and I worry about those who can't find work, but I take comfort in knowing our nation will probably be alright in the long run. In all sincerity, can our nation really be alright in the long run with so many people unemployed, for such a long time? When good times return, I'm saving more and speding less. I not borrowing to buy and I resolve to not return to my old ways of serial refinancing my primary residence. Oh who am I kidding? When credit loosens up again, I'm doing what every red blooded American is going to do -- I'm going to start shopping again. And so the cycle goes ........

Rob Riebeth of CA 1:42AM June 17, 2010

Unemployment, always the lagging indicator, is likely to remain static due to that great wooshing sound, Ross Perot warned us about!!! Economists have failed to figure in America's loss of Manufacturing preeminence, to China, India, etc. Our fall as super engine of the world's goods, will continue unabated until we retool to the 21st Century Economy ( i.e. Green Technology, High Speed Rails etc.) Also our tax structure is such that only 47% of Americans pay Income tax -- The other 53% pay absolutely nothing--- Being either too Rich (and so offshore and use loopholes) or too poor to pay. The only equitable solution I can see would be for the US to replace Income tax with a National Sales Tax (Exempting food and Medicine) -- This would allow us to enact a defacto Import tax without breaking our many trade aggreements -- Which would make up, at least a part of our loss of manufacturing. A National Sales tax would bring in much more revenue than Income tax -- and would be acceptable ,if it replaced Income tax-- Income tax is Inequitable , and doesn't produce enough Revenue!! I think its time to think outside the Box!! Would the Public accept an 8% National Sales Tax if Income tax were abolished ? --- I think it would be above a 90% approval in favor of a Sales tax!!!

Brian Walsh of ID 10:53PM May 08, 2010

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Is Your Portfolio Ready for a Double-Dip?

With the looming threat of a double-dip recession, investors should position their portfolios to protect themselves from another downturn.

advertisement