Do We Need the Debt Ceiling?

Some experts say it’s unnecessary and has morphed into a political tool

July 19, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (47)

"I'm not opposed to the idea of having a debt ceiling," says Adolfo Laurenti, deputy chief economist at Chicago-based financial services firm Mesirow Financial. "In general, one problem that most countries have around the world is that the spending power of the government is, for the most part, unchecked and that really allows some governments to spend exorbitant amounts of money and get themselves in trouble."

While the United States might benefit from having some benchmark for debt issuance, the current incarnation of the debt ceiling rule is less than ideal. "The debt ceiling is not a very smart rule because it's in nominal terms," Laurenti says. "Because the size of the economy keeps growing so spending is growing, we've had to go through this painful exercise of raising the debt ceiling with a certain frequency."

A system based on debt as a percent of GDP would be better, Laurenti says, and should include the flexibility to issue more debt during recessions or other financial emergencies. "Ideally you would want to have something on a constitutional level," he says, emphasizing the need for a long-term rather than short-term solution for the debt problem. "When you make the rules out of a normal Congressional procedure, then in two years you might have a new majority that will change everything."

[See European Debt Crisis: Could Italy Be Next?]

Eventually, Congress must raise the debt ceiling—not doing so would be economic suicide, experts say, with far-reaching impacts not only at home but abroad as well. Until August 2, the Treasury can continue "shuffling paper" to meet the country's financial obligations, but past that date, the details start to become foggy. The Treasury will have to prioritize payments, which could mean suspending Social Security payments or even delaying interest payments to bondholders, an event that would likely send global markets reeling.

That's the worst-case scenario. Most experts say an agreement will be made ahead of the August deadline, but the bottom line is that squabbling over the debt ceiling is distracting Congress from dealing with the fundamental issues at the core of the country's debt problem. Until those are resolved, structural problems with spending, revenue, and debt will continue cropping up and over time could degrade America's reputation among investors as a fiscally responsible country.

"At the end of the day, what matters is our fiscal house and how we are managing it," Aggarwal says. "We've had such drama going on and the negative side is it creates so much uncertainty in the marketplace, and the financial markets hate uncertainty. The underlying issues have to be addressed. We really need to think about getting our deficit down."

Twitter: @mmhandley

Tags:
debt,
Congress,
President,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (47)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The U.S. Senate, in an unusual procedure, cleared the way Thursday for the U.S. to lift its borrowing authority by $500 billion to $15.19 trillion, enough to keep the support federal government borrowing through late January or early February.

The action came under an unusual legislative procedure spelled out under the August agreement to raise the U.S. debt ceiling and avoid a U.S. credit default. In a 52-45 vote, the Senate blocked an attempt by Republicans to slow down the process that will result in the $500 billion debt-ceiling increase.

harbourfx.com

Forex Trading of CT 4:00PM September 10, 2011

Refinancing means taking out a new mortgage with a lower interest rate to pay off your existing mortgage, search online for "123 Refinance" I got 2.831% rate on refinance! you should know your rate before you find a company. Learn the secrets and tips about refinance

rickphillips77 of CA 6:34AM July 20, 2011

Ethics: the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation. 1

It is not ethically wrong for me to take out a mortgage that I plan to repay either by my own earnings or by reselling the house that I have taken care of to back up that mortgage.

It is ethically wrong for me to take out a mortgage for a house that I live in and never plan to repay instead expecting my children and grand children to continue to pay on it in perpetuity (and that they never get to live in).

The debt we are building now benefits us now. The interest on that debt will be a burden on many generations to come. Incurring debt for an other person without their consent is unethical.

1. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary., Eleventh ed. (Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003).

Laski of OR 7:15PM July 19, 2011

Most Connected Company

Find out how America’s best companies are succeeding by tapping big data, mobile solutions, social media, and crowdsourcing to adapt and compete in an increasingly connected world.

See the companies »

advertisement

Slide Shows

Best-Sellers to Help Your 2013 Finances

Seeking advice? Check out these acclaimed financial books.

10 Warning Signs of Identity Theft

About 10 million Americans fall victim each year.

Items You Should Buy Online

Skip the store to save money and time.

Latest Video

advertisement